World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 45 3779 3481 1806 1633 136 12691

Cara C. Lewis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cara C. Lewis between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cara C. Lewis published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2021. 22 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2021. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 14 publications
1982 2025

166 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cara C. Lewis: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 1
2010 2
2011 3
2012 6
2013 2
2014 3
2015 9
2016 8
2017 9
2018 17
2019 12
2020 13
2021 24
2022 20
2023 11
2024 8
2025 14
Total 166
Download as CSV

Cara C. Lewis publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cara C. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 136 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 136
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Cara C. Lewis D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cara C. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260 45
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Cara C. Lewis is affiliated with Kaiser Permanente in the United States and has concentrated their research within the field of Health Professions, with particular emphasis on General Health Professions. Their work spans several subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Clinical Psychology, and Social Psychology.

Their research centers on topics related to Health Policy Implementation Science, Community Health and Development, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Evaluation and Performance Assessment, and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations.

Cara C. Lewis has contributed to academic literature through numerous publications in key venues such as Implementation Research and Practice, Implementation Science, Implementation Science Communications, Research Square, and Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

  • A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies, 2021, JAMA
  • A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health, 2020, Implementation Science
  • Promises and pitfalls in implementation science from the perspective of US-based researchers: learning from a pre-mortem, 2022, Implementation Science
  • Quantitative measures of health policy implementation determinants and outcomes: a systematic review, 2020, Implementation Science
  • Measuring implementation outcomes: An updated systematic review of measures' psychometric properties, 2020, Implementation Research and Practice

Throughout their career, they have collaborated frequently with researchers including Byron J. Powell, Bryan J. Weiner, Kayne D. Mettert, Aaron R. Lyon, and Caitlin N. Dorsey.

Best Publications

  • Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures

    Bryan J. Weiner;Cara C. Lewis;Cara C. Lewis;Cara C. Lewis;Cameo Stanick;Byron J. Powell

  • Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies.

    Byron J. Powell;Rinad S. Beidas;Cara C. Lewis;Gregory A. Aarons

  • Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda.

    Byron J. Powell;Maria E. Fernandez;Nathaniel J. Williams;Gregory A. Aarons

  • From Classification to Causality: Advancing Understanding of Mechanisms of Change in Implementation Science

    Cara C Lewis;Predrag Klasnja;Byron J Powell;Aaron R Lyon

  • Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review

    Cara C. Lewis;Meredith Boyd;Ajeng Puspitasari;Elena Navarro

  • Using Measurement-Based Care to Enhance Any Treatment.

    Kelli Scott;Cara C. Lewis

  • A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies: The AGReMA Statement.

    Hopin Lee;Hopin Lee;Aidan G. Cashin;Aidan G. Cashin;Sarah E. Lamb;Sarah E. Lamb;Sally Hopewell

  • Outcomes for implementation science: an enhanced systematic review of instruments using evidence-based rating criteria.

    Cara C. Lewis;Cara C. Lewis;Sarah Fischer;Bryan J. Weiner;Cameo Stanick

  • A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health

    Cara C. Lewis;Cara C. Lewis;Cara C. Lewis;Meredith R. Boyd;Callie Walsh-Bailey;Callie Walsh-Bailey;Aaron R. Lyon

  • Instrumentation issues in implementation science

    Ruben G Martinez;Cara C Lewis;Cara C Lewis;Bryan J Weiner

  • Monitoring Treatment Progress and Providing Feedback is Viewed Favorably but Rarely Used in Practice

    Amanda Jensen-Doss;Emily M. Becker Haimes;Ashley M. Smith;Aaron R. Lyon

  • Part II: A Qualitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers

    Elena Byhoff;Emilia H De Marchis;Danielle Hessler;Caroline M Fichtenberg

  • Promises and pitfalls in implementation science from the perspective of US-based researchers: learning from a pre-mortem

    Unknown

  • Proceedings from the 9th annual conference on the science of dissemination and implementation

    David Chambers;Lisa Simpson;Felicia Hill-Briggs;Gila Neta

  • The Society for Implementation Research Collaboration Instrument Review Project: A methodology to promote rigorous evaluation

    Cara C Lewis;Cara C Lewis;Cameo F Stanick;Ruben G Martinez;Ruben G Martinez;Bryan J Weiner

  • Quantitative measures of health policy implementation determinants and outcomes: a systematic review

    Peg Allen;Meagan Pilar;Callie Walsh-Bailey;Cole Hooley

  • Impact of Childhood Trauma on Treatment Outcome in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS)

    Cara C. Lewis;Anne D. Simons;Lananh J. Nguyen;Jessica L. Murakami

  • The mechanics of implementation strategies and measures: advancing the study of implementation mechanisms

    Unknown

  • Psychometric and Pragmatic Properties of Social Risk Screening Tools: A Systematic Review.

    Nora B. Henrikson;Nora B. Henrikson;Paula R. Blasi;Caitlin N. Dorsey;Kayne D. Mettert

  • Training and dissemination of cognitive behavior therapy for depression in adults: a preliminary examination of therapist competence and client outcomes

    Anne D. Simons;Christine A. Padesky;Jeremy Montemarano;Cara C. Lewis

  • Toward criteria for pragmatic measurement in implementation research and practice: a stakeholder-driven approach using concept mapping

    Byron J. Powell;Cameo F. Stanick;Heather M. Halko;Caitlin N. Dorsey

  • The Role of Early Symptom Trajectories and Pretreatment Variables in Predicting Treatment Response to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.

    Cara C. Lewis;Anne D. Simons;Hyoun K. Kim

  • Advancing implementation science through measure development and evaluation: a study protocol

    Cara C. Lewis;Cara C. Lewis;Bryan J. Weiner;Cameo Stanick;Sarah M. Fischer

  • A Method for Tracking Implementation Strategies: An Exemplar Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Community Behavioral Health Clinics

    Meredith R. Boyd;Byron J. Powell;David Endicott;Cara C. Lewis

Frequent Co-Authors

Byron J. Powell
Byron J. Powell Washington University in St. Louis
Bryan J. Weiner
Bryan J. Weiner University of Washington
Aaron R. Lyon
Aaron R. Lyon University of Washington
Rinad S. Beidas
Rinad S. Beidas University of Pennsylvania
Gregory A. Aarons
Gregory A. Aarons University of California, San Diego
Anne D. Simons
Anne D. Simons University of Notre Dame
Shannon Dorsey
Shannon Dorsey University of Washington
Katherine Anne Comtois
Katherine Anne Comtois University of Washington
David A. Chambers
David A. Chambers National Institutes of Health
Amanda Jensen-Doss
Amanda Jensen-Doss University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to many rewarding career options. If you’re considering an online path, there are flexible programs tailored to fit both your interests and busy schedule.

Many students look for cacrep accredited programs online to prepare for licensed counseling roles. These programs ensure comprehensive training that meets professional standards.

If you’re interested in supporting families and relationships, marriage and family therapy certification online can help you qualify for specialized careers in therapy. You’ll find degree options that emphasize flexibility, affordability, and high educational standards.

Psychology remains a popular choice, and there are a variety of online degrees for psychology that can be completed remotely. These programs can lead to careers in clinical settings, research, human resources, and more.

Those passionate about advocacy and social change may consider online msw programs. Earning a Master of Social Work online is a great way to enter or advance in social work, even with a non-traditional academic background.

Each of these online pathways offers unique career opportunities while providing the flexibility today's students need.

Best Scientists Citing Cara C. Lewis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles