World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
63
Citations
33767
World Ranking
1138
National Ranking
526

Enola K. Proctor publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enola K. Proctor sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 255 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Enola K. Proctor D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enola K. Proctor sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Enola K. Proctor is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on health professions, with significant contributions to general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, clinical psychology, social psychology, and economics and econometrics.

Their work covers key topics such as health policy implementation science, mental health and patient involvement, primary care and health outcomes, interprofessional education and collaboration, evaluation and performance assessment, health systems, economic evaluations and quality of life, and health and medical research impacts.

Proctor has published extensively in various academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include Implementation Science, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, BMJ Open, and Implementation Research and Practice.

Frequently collaborating co-authors are Alicia C. Bunger, Rebecca Lengnick-Hall, Cole Hooley, Byron J. Powell, and Ross C. Brownson.

Selected recent papers reflect the scope of their research:

  • Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review, 2023, Implementation Science
  • Strategy Configurations Directly Linked to Higher Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Starts, 2020, Medical Care
  • FAST: A Framework to Assess Speed of Translation of Health Innovations to Practice and Policy, 2022, Global Implementation Research and Applications
  • Six practical recommendations for improved implementation outcomes reporting, 2022, Implementation Science
  • Improvement Science and Implementation Science in Cancer Care: Identifying Areas of Synergy and Opportunities for Further Integration, 2020, Journal of General Internal Medicine

Best Publications

  • Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda

    Enola Proctor;Hiie Silmere;Ramesh Raghavan;Peter Hovmand

  • A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project.

    Byron James Powell;Thomas J. Waltz;Matthew J. Chinman;Laura J. Damschroder

  • Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting

    Enola K Proctor;Byron J Powell;J Curtis McMillen

  • Implementation Research in Mental Health Services: an Emerging Science with Conceptual, Methodological, and Training challenges

    Enola K. Proctor;John Landsverk;John Landsverk;Gregory Aarons;David Chambers

  • Dissemination and implementation research in health : translating science to practice

    Ross C. Brownson;Graham A. Colditz;Enola Knisley Proctor

  • A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health.

    Byron J. Powell;J. Curtis McMillen;Enola K. Proctor;Christopher R. Carpenter

  • Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study

    Thomas J. Waltz;Byron James Powell;Monica M. Matthieu;Monica M. Matthieu;Laura J. Damschroder

  • Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies.

    Byron J. Powell;Rinad S. Beidas;Cara C. Lewis;Gregory A. Aarons

  • Dissemination and Implementation Research in HealthTranslating Science to Practice

    Ross C. Brownson;Graham A. Colditz;Enola K. Proctor

  • Sustainability of evidence-based healthcare: research agenda, methodological advances, and infrastructure support

    Enola Proctor;Douglas Luke;Annaliese Calhoun;Curtis McMillen

  • Implementation research: new imperatives and opportunities in global health.

    Sally Theobald;Neal Brandes;Margaret Gyapong;Sameh El-Saharty

  • Imputing Missing Data: A Comparison of Methods for Social Work Researchers

    Jeanne A. Saunders;Nancy Morrow-Howell;Edward Spitznagel;Peter Dore

  • Race, Gender and Class: Guidelines for Practice With Individuals, Families and Groups

    Larry E. Davis;Enola Knisley Proctor

  • A Systematic Review of Strategies for Implementing Empirically Supported Mental Health Interventions

    Byron James Powell;Enola K. Proctor;Joseph E. Glass

  • Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review

    Unknown

  • Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice, second edition

    Ross C. Brownson;Graham A. Colditz;Enola K. Proctor

  • Cultural adaptation and implementation of evidence-based parent-training: A systematic review and critique of guiding evidence

    Ana A. Baumann;Byron J. Powell;Patricia L. Kohl;Rachel G. Tabak

  • Getting a clinical innovation into practice: An introduction to implementation strategies.

    Jo Ann E. Kirchner;Jo Ann E. Kirchner;Jeffrey L. Smith;Byron J. Powell;Thomas J. Waltz

  • Social Work Research and the Quest for Effective Practice

    Aaron Rosen;Enola K. Proctor;Marlys M. Staudt

  • Expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC): protocol for a mixed methods study

    Thomas J. Waltz;Thomas J. Waltz;Byron J. Powell;Matthew J. Chinman;Jeffrey L. Smith

  • Distinctions between treatment outcomes and their implications for treatment evaluation.

    Aaron Rosen;Enola K. Proctor

  • The Challenge of Racial Difference: Skills for Clinical Practice

    Enola K. Proctor;Larry E. Davis

  • Use of Concept Mapping to Characterize Relationships Among Implementation Strategies and Assess Their Feasibility and Importance

    Thomas J. Waltz;Byron J. Powell;Monica M. Matthieu;Laura J. Damschroder

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy Morrow-Howell
Nancy Morrow-Howell Washington University in St. Louis
Ross C. Brownson
Ross C. Brownson Washington University in St. Louis
Byron J. Powell
Byron J. Powell Washington University in St. Louis
Matthew Chinman
Matthew Chinman RAND Corporation
David A. Chambers
David A. Chambers National Institutes of Health
Graham A. Colditz
Graham A. Colditz Washington University in St. Louis
Gregory A. Aarons
Gregory A. Aarons University of California, San Diego
Charles Glisson
Charles Glisson University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Cara C. Lewis
Cara C. Lewis Kaiser Permanente
Rinad S. Beidas
Rinad S. Beidas University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education is making it easier than ever to pursue advanced degrees in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Many students are choosing flexible options to balance their studies with work or family commitments.

For those interested in clinical psychology, an online psyd program offers a path toward licensed practice and leadership roles in mental health settings. Individuals seeking careers in family counseling may explore mft programs, which focus on marriage and family therapy and can often be completed quickly online.

If you are looking for value along with quality, an online master degree in psychology may be a cost-effective option for unlocking new career opportunities in education, research, or counseling.

For professionals aiming to advance in educational leadership, the shortest online edd programs provide a streamlined way to earn a doctoral degree and move into high-level administrative roles in schools, universities, and organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Enola K. Proctor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles