World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6357 5913 3451 3131 229 10541

Nancy Morrow-Howell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nancy Morrow-Howell between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nancy Morrow-Howell published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2020. 15 of the 273 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2020. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 8 publications
1986 2025

273 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nancy Morrow-Howell: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 3
1988 2
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 4
1993 4
1994 4
1995 3
1996 2
1997 3
1998 5
1999 4
2000 4
2001 2
2002 2
2003 4
2004 8
2005 3
2006 12
2007 6
2008 13
2009 14
2010 12
2011 6
2012 12
2013 10
2014 6
2015 5
2016 6
2017 14
2018 12
2019 13
2020 21
2021 11
2022 14
2023 9
2024 7
2025 8
Total 273
Download as CSV

Nancy Morrow-Howell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy Morrow-Howell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 229 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 229
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nancy Morrow-Howell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy Morrow-Howell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nancy Morrow-Howell is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within social sciences and psychology, with a strong focus on aging and gerontology.

The main fields of study for Nancy Morrow-Howell include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Their work also extends into several subfields such as:

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Demography
  • Health
  • General Health Professions
  • Sociology and Political Science

The primary topics covered in their research involve:

  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Recent significant publications include:

  • Recovering from the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Focus on Older Adults, 2020, Journal of Aging & Social Policy
  • Emergency Department Care Transitions for Patients With Cognitive Impairment: A Scoping Review, 2022, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
  • Optimal Emergency Department Care Practices for Persons Living With Dementia: A Scoping Review, 2022, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
  • Detecting Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review, 2022, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
  • Emergency Department Communication in Persons Living With Dementia and Care Partners: A Scoping Review, 2022, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Nancy Morrow-Howell frequently collaborates with other researchers. Some of their frequent co-authors include:

  • Peter Sun
  • Natalie Galucia
  • Brian Carpenter
  • Ula Hwang
  • Beth Prusaczyk

Their research is commonly published in venues such as:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • Journal of Gerontological Social Work
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
  • Journal of Aging & Social Policy
  • Journal of Applied Gerontology

Best Publications

  • Effects of Volunteering on the Well-Being of Older Adults

    Nancy Morrow-Howell;Jim Hinterlong;Philip A. Rozario;Fengyan Tang

  • Handbook of theories of aging

    Vern L. Bengtson;Richard A. Jr. Settersten;Brian K. Kennedy;Nancy Morrow-Howell

  • Volunteering in Later Life: Research Frontiers

    Nancy Morrow-Howell

  • Recovering from the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Focus on Older Adults.

    Nancy Morrow-Howell;Natalie Galucia;Emma Swinford

  • Productive Aging: Concepts and Challenges

    Nancy Morrow-Howell;James Hinterlong;Michael W. Sherraden

  • Who Benefits From Volunteering? Variations in Perceived Benefits

    Nancy Morrow-Howell;Song-Iee Hong;Fengyan Tang

  • Imputing Missing Data: A Comparison of Methods for Social Work Researchers

    Jeanne A. Saunders;Nancy Morrow-Howell;Edward Spitznagel;Peter Dore

  • Role Enhancement or Role Strain: Assessing the Impact of Multiple Productive Roles on Older Caregiver Well-Being

    Philip A. Rozario;Nancy Morrow-Howell;James E. Hinterlong

  • Increasing Opportunities for the Productive Engagement of Older Adults: A Response to Population Aging

    Ernest Gonzales;Christina Matz-Costa;Nancy Morrow-Howell

  • Health outcomes of Experience Corps®: A high-commitment volunteer program.

    S.I. Hong;Nancy Morrow-Howell

  • Productive Engagement and Late Life Physical and Mental Health Findings from a Nationally Representative Panel Study

    James E. Hinterlong;Nancy Morrow-Howell;Philip A. Rozario

  • Elderly Volunteers: Reasons for Initiating and Terminating Service

    Nancy Morrow-Howell;Ada C Mui

  • Organizational Support and Volunteering Benefits for Older Adults

    Fengyan Tang;EunHee Choi;Nancy Morrow-Howell

  • The M Word: Multicollinearity in Multiple Regression.

    Nancy Morrow-Howell

  • Rationales for Practice Decisions: Variations in Knowledge Use by Decision Task and Social Work Service:

    Aaron Rosen;Enola E. Proctor;Nancy Morrow-Howell;Marlys Staudt

  • An Investigation of Activity Profiles of Older Adults

    Nancy Morrow-Howell;Michelle Putnam;Yung Soo Lee;Jennifer C. Greenfield

  • Adequacy of Home Care and Hospital Readmission for Elderly Congestive Heart Failure Patients

    Enola K. Proctor;Nancy Morrow-Howell;Hong Li;Peter Dore

  • Measuring treatment fidelity in a rehabilitation intervention study.

    Mary W. Hildebrand;Helen H. Host;Ellen F. Binder;Brian Carpenter

  • Changing Medical Students' Attitudes Toward Older Adults

    Ernest Gonzales;Nancy Morrow-Howell;Pat Gilbert

  • Why do older adult volunteers stop volunteering

    Fengyan Tang;Nancy Morrow-Howell;Eunhee Choi

Frequent Co-Authors

Enola K. Proctor
Enola K. Proctor Washington University in St. Louis
Michael Sherraden
Michael Sherraden Washington University in St. Louis
Melissa Jonson-Reid
Melissa Jonson-Reid Washington University in St. Louis
Edward L. Spitznagel
Edward L. Spitznagel Washington University in St. Louis
Kenneth E. Freedland
Kenneth E. Freedland Washington University in St. Louis
Sheung-Tak Cheng
Sheung-Tak Cheng Education University of Hong Kong
Emily A. Greenfield
Emily A. Greenfield Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Sanna J. Thompson
Sanna J. Thompson The University of Texas at Austin
John C. Morris
John C. Morris Washington University in St. Louis
Namkee G. Choi
Namkee G. Choi The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up numerous pathways for students interested in the field. One of the primary considerations is affordability, as degree costs can vary greatly by location and institution. Many students look for affordable psychology programs in New York City, which often offer flexible online options to fit different schedules and budgets.

In neighboring states, affordable psychology programs in New Jersey and affordable psychology degrees in New York present a wide range of accredited choices for learners seeking value without sacrificing educational quality. Ohio is also recognized for its affordable psychology programs in Ohio, making it another great option for prospective psychology students.

Graduates of these programs can pursue various career paths, from school counseling to mental health services, research, and even business roles. Online programs frequently offer concentrations in areas like clinical psychology, social psychology, or organizational psychology, helping students specialize for their intended careers. Careful program selection—especially focusing on affordability and accredited quality—can help set the foundation for a rewarding future in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Nancy Morrow-Howell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles