World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
32
Citations
5016
World Ranking
7289
National Ranking
3542

Emily A. Greenfield publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily A. Greenfield sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 130 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Emily A. Greenfield D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily A. Greenfield sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Formal Volunteering as a Protective Factor for Older Adults' Psychological Well-Being

    Emily A. Greenfield;Nadine F. Marks

  • Religious Social Identity as an Explanatory Factor for Associations between More Frequent Formal Religious Participation and Psychological Well-Being.

    Emily A. Greenfield;Nadine F. Marks

  • Using Ecological Frameworks to Advance a Field of Research, Practice, and Policy on Aging-in-Place Initiatives

    Emily A. Greenfield

  • Linked Lives: Adult Children's Problems and Their Parents' Psychological and Relational Well-Being.

    Emily A. Greenfield;Nadine F. Marks

  • Age-Friendly Community Initiatives: Conceptual Issues and Key Questions

    Emily A. Greenfield;Mia Oberlink;Andrew E. Scharlach;Margaret B. Neal

  • Do Formal Religious Participation and Spiritual Perceptions Have Independent Linkages with Diverse Dimensions of Psychological Well-Being?∗:

    Emily A. Greenfield;George E. Vaillant;Nadine F. Marks

  • Violence from parents in childhood and obesity in adulthood: Using food in response to stress as a mediator of risk

    Emily A. Greenfield;Nadine F. Marks

  • Childhood Abuse as a Risk Factor for Sleep Problems in Adulthood: Evidence from a U.S. National Study

    Emily A. Greenfield;Chioun Lee;Elliot L. Friedman;Kristen W. Springer

  • Identifying experiences of physical and psychological violence in childhood that jeopardize mental health in adulthood

    Emily A. Greenfield;Nadine F. Marks

  • Child abuse as a life-course social determinant of adult health

    Emily A. Greenfield

  • Witnessing domestic abuse in childhood as an independent risk factor for depressive symptoms in young adulthood

    Dianne Russell;Kristen W. Springer;Kristen W. Springer;Emily A. Greenfield

  • Identifying living arrangements that heighten risk for loneliness in later life: Evidence from the U.S. national social life, health, and aging project

    Emily Anne Greenfield;David Russell

  • A conceptual framework for examining the promise of the NORC program and Village models to promote aging in place

    Emily A. Greenfield;Andrew Scharlach;Amanda J. Lehning;Joan K. Davitt

  • Continuous Participation in Voluntary Groups as a Protective Factor for the Psychological Well-Being of Adults Who Develop Functional Limitations: Evidence From the National Survey of Families and Households

    Emily A. Greenfield;Nadine F. Marks

  • Childhood Socioeconomic Status and Later Life Cognition: Evidence From the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study:

    Emily A. Greenfield;Sara M. Moorman

  • A Tale of Two Community Initiatives for Promoting Aging in Place: Similarities and Differences in the National Implementation of NORC Programs and Villages

    Emily A. Greenfield;Andrew E. Scharlach;Amanda J. Lehning;Joan K. Davitt

  • Sense of Community as a Protective Factor against Long-Term Psychological Effects of Childhood Violence

    Emily A. Greenfield;Nadine F. Marks

  • Community Gerontology: A Framework for Research, Policy, and Practice on Communities and Aging

    Emily A Greenfield;Kathy Black;Tine Buffel;Jarmin Yeh

  • Profiles of physical and psychological violence in childhood as a risk factor for poorer adult health: evidence from the 1995-2005 National Survey of Midlife in the United States.

    Emily A. Greenfield;Nadine F. Marks

  • Support from Neighbors and Aging in Place: Can NORC Programs Make a Difference?

    Emily A. Greenfield

Frequent Co-Authors

Nadine F. Marks
Nadine F. Marks University of Wisconsin–Madison
Andrew E. Scharlach
Andrew E. Scharlach University of California, Berkeley
George E. Vaillant
George E. Vaillant Harvard University
Nancy Morrow-Howell
Nancy Morrow-Howell Washington University in St. Louis
Chandra A. Reynolds
Chandra A. Reynolds University of California, Riverside
Habib Chaudhury
Habib Chaudhury Simon Fraser University
Tine Buffel
Tine Buffel University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Emily A. Greenfield

Recently Published Articles