World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
157
Citations
92820
World Ranking
884
National Ranking
502

Russell E. Glasgow publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell E. Glasgow sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 617 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Russell E. Glasgow D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell E. Glasgow sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 157 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Russell E. Glasgow is affiliated with the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within health professions and medicine, featuring extensive publication activity in health-related clinical and implementation sciences.

The main fields of study associated with Glasgow's work include:

  • Health Professions
  • Medicine

The scientist's contributions extend into several subfields, most notably:

  • General Health Professions
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Epidemiology

Key topics addressed in Glasgow's research span diverse aspects of health systems, policy, and outcomes, including:

  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Community Health and Development
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Public Health Policies and Education

Russell E. Glasgow has contributed to a variety of peer-reviewed papers. Some recent notable publications include:

  • "An Extension of RE-AIM to Enhance Sustainability: Addressing Dynamic Context and Promoting Health Equity Over Time" (2020), Frontiers in Public Health
  • "Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and resources" (2021), Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  • "Designing for Dissemination and Sustainability to Promote Equitable Impacts on Health" (2022), Annual Review of Public Health
  • "Revisiting concepts of evidence in implementation science" (2022), Implementation Science
  • "Implementation science issues in understanding, collecting, and using cost estimates: a multi-stakeholder perspective" (2021), Implementation Science

The research output of Glasgow is published frequently in key scientific venues committed to implementation and public health sciences. These include:

  • Implementation Science
  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  • Implementation Science Communications
  • UNC Libraries

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Glasgow's academic activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Borsika A. Rabin
  • Amy G. Huebschmann
  • Ross C. Brownson
  • Katy E. Trinkley
  • Daniel D. Matlock

Best Publications

  • Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

    R E Glasgow;T M Vogt;S M Boles

  • The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale.

    Deborah J. Toobert;Sarah E. Hampson;Russell E. Glasgow

  • Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition.

    Russell E. Glasgow;Edward Lichtenstein;Alfred C. Marcus

  • RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review

    Russell E. Glasgow;Samantha M. Harden;Bridget Gaglio;Borsika Rabin;Borsika Rabin

  • The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change

    David A Chambers;Russell E Glasgow;Kurt C Stange

  • How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.

    Russell E. Glasgow;Karen M. Emmons

  • Evaluating the Relevance, Generalization, and Applicability of Research Issues in External Validation and Translation Methodology

    Lawrence W. Green;Russell E. Glasgow

  • The Delivery of Public Health Interventions via the Internet: Actualizing Their Potential

    Gary G. Bennett;Russell E. Glasgow

  • Quality Improvement in Chronic Illness Care: A Collaborative Approach

    Edward H. Wagner;Edward H. Wagner;Russell E. Glasgow;Connie Davis;Amy E. Bonomi

  • Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC)

    Russell E. Glasgow;Edward H. Wagner;Judith Schaefer;Lisa D. Mahoney

  • The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time

    Bridget Gaglio;Jo Ann Shoup;Russell E. Glasgow

  • National Institutes of Health Approaches to Dissemination and Implementation Science: Current and Future Directions

    Russell E. Glasgow;Cynthia Vinson;David A. Chambers;Muin J. Khoury

  • A Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) for Integrating Research Findings into Practice

    Adrianne C. Feldstein;Russell E. Glasgow

  • Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

    Lawrence Fisher;Joseph T Mullan;Patricia A Areán;Russell E. Glasgow

  • The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management?

    Russell E. Glasgow;H.Garth McKay;John D. Piette;John D. Piette;Kim D. Reynolds

  • The Effectiveness of Disease and Case Management for People with Diabetes A Systematic Review

    Susan L Norris;Phyllis J Nichols;Carl J Caspersen;Russell E Glasgow

  • Quality of Life and Associated Characteristics in a Large National Sample of Adults With Diabetes

    Russell E Glasgow;Laurie Ruggiero;Elizabeth G Eakin;Janet Dryfoos

  • The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?

    Russell E. Glasgow;Lisa M. Klesges;David A. Dzewaltowski;Sheana S. Bull

  • A longitudinal study of affective and anxiety disorders, depressive affect and diabetes distress in adults with Type 2 diabetes

    L. Fisher;M. M. Skaff;J. T. Mullan;P. Arean

  • NationalInstitutesofHealthApproachestoDisseminationand ImplementationScience:CurrentandFutureDirections

    Russell E. Glasgow;Cynthia Vinson;David Chambers;Muin J. Khoury

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisa A. Strycker
Lisa A. Strycker Oregon Research Institute
Paul A. Estabrooks
Paul A. Estabrooks University of Nebraska Medical Center
Edward Lichtenstein
Edward Lichtenstein Oregon Research Institute
Manuel Barrera
Manuel Barrera Arizona State University
Sarah E. Hampson
Sarah E. Hampson Oregon Research Institute
Sheana Bull
Sheana Bull University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Lawrence Fisher
Lawrence Fisher University of California, San Francisco
Lisa M. Klesges
Lisa M. Klesges Washington University in St. Louis
David A. Dzewaltowski
David A. Dzewaltowski University of Nebraska Medical Center
Ross C. Brownson
Ross C. Brownson Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn't have to mean following a traditional path. Many students and professionals are choosing online degree programs to gain flexible, affordable qualifications that open new pathways in healthcare. From nursing to advanced practice roles, several affordable online options exist.

For those seeking to become advanced practice nurses, cheap online fnp programs offer a cost-effective way to qualify as a Family Nurse Practitioner. Alternatively, students looking for master’s level credentials can explore the cheapest online msn programs to broaden their career prospects and improve earning potential.

If you’re considering a leadership or academic role, obtaining a phd nursing education online can be an excellent long-term investment. Registered nurses (RNs) interested in advancing their qualifications can find accessible pathways through the cheapest online rn to bsn programs.

Whichever path you choose, these online programs are designed to help you balance work, study, and personal commitments while advancing your career in the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Russell E. Glasgow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles