World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
69
Citations
22148
World Ranking
2343
National Ranking
1364

Sarah E. Hampson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah E. Hampson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 202 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Sarah E. Hampson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah E. Hampson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sarah E. Hampson is affiliated with the Oregon Research Institute in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a focused expertise across several subfields, including Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, and Applied Psychology.

The scientist's main topics of work cover a range of areas within psychological science. These include Personality Traits and Psychology, Cognitive Abilities and Testing, Identity, Memory, and Therapy, Emotional Intelligence and Performance, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology.

Hampson's recent scholarly contributions include the following papers:

  • How our work influences who we are: Testing a theory of vocational and personality development over fifty years, 2020, Journal of Research in Personality
  • Personality Stability and Change over Time, 2020, The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • Personality Stability and Change over Time, 2020, The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • John M. (Jack) Digman, 2020, The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • John M. (Jack) Digman, 2020, The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

The majority of their publications have appeared in The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, with at least four documented works, while one paper was published in the Journal of Research in Personality.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Lewis R. Goldberg
  • Filip Lievens
  • Stephen A. Woods
  • Grant W. Edmonds
  • Jonathan M. Adler

Best Publications

  • The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale.

    Deborah J. Toobert;Sarah E. Hampson;Russell E. Glasgow

  • The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature.

    R Crow;H Gage;S Hampson;J Hart

  • Influence of supplementary vitamins, minerals and essential fatty acids on the antisocial behaviour of young adult prisoners. Randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

    C. Bernard Gesch;Sean M. Hammond;Sarah E. Hampson;Anita Eves

  • Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction.

    Douglas L Medin;William D Wattenmaker;Sarah E Hampson

  • Personal-model beliefs and social-environmental barriers related to diabetes self-management

    Russell E Glasgow;Sarah E Hampson;Lisa A Strycker;Laurie Ruggiero

  • Personality Processes: Mechanisms by Which Personality Traits “Get Outside the Skin”

    Sarah E. Hampson

  • Measuring the Big Five with single items using a bipolar response scale

    Stephen A. Woods;Sarah E. Hampson

  • A first large cohort study of personality trait stability over the 40 years between elementary school and midlife.

    Sarah E. Hampson;Lewis R. Goldberg

  • The role of expectancies in the placebo effect and their use in the delivery of health care: a systematic review.

    R. Crow;H. Gage;S. Hampson;J. Hart

  • Effects of educational and psychosocial interventions for adolescents with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.

    SE Hampson;TC Skinner;J Hart;L Storey

  • Personal models of diabetes and their relations to self-care activities.

    Sarah E. Hampson;Russell E. Glasgow;Deborah J. Toobert

  • The Perception of Emotion from Body Movement in Point-Light Displays of Interpersonal Dialogue

    Tanya J Clarke;Mark F Bradshaw;David T Field;Sarah E Hampson

  • Social Support and Personal Models of Diabetes as Predictors of Self-Care and Well-Being: A Longitudinal Study of Adolescents With Diabetes

    Skinner Tc;John M;Hampson Se

  • Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications.

    Sarah E. Hampson;Oliver P. John;Lewis R. Goldberg

  • The Construction of Personality: An Introduction

    Sarah E. Hampson

  • Mechanisms by Which Childhood Personality Traits Influence Adult Health Status: Educational Attainment and Healthy Behaviors

    Sarah E. Hampson;Lewis R. Goldberg;Thomas M. Vogt;Joan P. Dubanoski

  • Improving self-care among older patients with type II diabetes: the "Sixty Something..." Study.

    Russell E. Glasgow;Deborah J. Toobert;Sarah E. Hampson;Jane E. Brown

  • Forty years on: Teachers' assessments of children's personality traits predict self-reported health behaviors and outcomes at midlife.

    Sarah E. Hampson;Lewis R. Goldberg;Thomas M. Vogt;Joan P. Dubanoski

  • Personal models of diabetes among older adults: relationship to self-management and other variables.

    Sarah E. Hampson;Russell E. Glasgow;Lyn S. Foster

  • The basic level in personality-trait hierarchies: studies of trait use and accessibility in different contexts.

    Oliver P. John;Sarah E. Hampson;Lewis R. Goldberg

  • Psychological perspectives on the self: J. Suls and A. G. Greenwald (Eds): Vol. 2. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J. (1983). ix + 287 pages. £22.95.

    Sarah E. Hampson

Frequent Co-Authors

Judy A. Andrews
Judy A. Andrews Oregon Research Institute
Russell E. Glasgow
Russell E. Glasgow University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Lewis R. Goldberg
Lewis R. Goldberg Oregon Research Institute
Mark Cropley
Mark Cropley University of Surrey
Margarete E. Vollrath
Margarete E. Vollrath University of Oslo
Edward Lichtenstein
Edward Lichtenstein Oregon Research Institute
Herbert H. Severson
Herbert H. Severson Oregon Research Institute
Patrick L. Hill
Patrick L. Hill Washington University in St. Louis
Sara Arber
Sara Arber University of Surrey
Lisa A. Strycker
Lisa A. Strycker Oregon Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree in the USA opens up many diverse career opportunities, but it’s important to understand which roles are available at different educational levels. For example, many students wonder, is a master’s degree enough to become a clinical psychologist? Typically, clinical psychologists require a doctoral degree; a master’s may lead to other supportive or counseling roles but not full clinical licensure.

Psychology graduates can work in various specialties, including child development and cognitive science. For those interested in supporting younger populations, there are a range of entry level child psychology jobs that offer opportunities in schools, community centers, and private practice settings.

Salaries and growth prospects in psychology vary. For instance, the average salary for a child and adolescent psychologist can be quite competitive, reflecting the increasing demand for specialists in this area. In cognitive science, there are a variety of cognitive psychology job options in research, healthcare, and technology.

Choosing an online psychology program tailored to your desired pathway can help you gain the right qualifications for a fulfilling and meaningful career.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah E. Hampson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles