World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
18537
World Ranking
3086
National Ranking
1757

Edward Lichtenstein publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward Lichtenstein sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 155 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Edward Lichtenstein D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward Lichtenstein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1975 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Edward Lichtenstein is affiliated with the Oregon Research Institute in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a career connected to this institution, contributing to the area of psychological research.

In 1975, Edward Lichtenstein was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), indicating a formal acknowledgment by a major professional body within the field of psychology.

There are no listed recent papers, book publications, frequent co-authors, or publication venues associated with Edward Lichtenstein in the available data. Similarly, there is no specified information on main fields or subfields of study, or main topics of work directly linked to their research output.

Best Publications

  • Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition.

    Russell E. Glasgow;Edward Lichtenstein;Alfred C. Marcus

  • Understanding and preventing relapse.

    Kelly David Brownell;G. Alan Marlatt;Edward Lichtenstein;G. Terence Wilson

  • Self-efficacy and relapse in smoking cessation programs.

    Mark M. Condiotte;Edward Lichtenstein

  • Social support and smoking cessation and maintenance.

    Robin J. Mermelstein;Sheldon Cohen;Edward Lichtenstein;John S. Baer

  • Debunking myths about self-quitting: Evidence from 10 prospective studies of persons who attempt to quit smoking by themselves.

    Sheldon Cohen;Edward Lichtenstein;James O. Prochaska;Joseph S. Rossi

  • Perceived stress, quitting smoking, and smoking relapse.

    Sheldon Cohen;Edward Lichtenstein

  • Smoking cessation: what have we learned over the past decade?

    Edward Lichtenstein;Russell E. Glasgow

  • Transdermal Nicotine for Smoking Cessation: Six-Month Results From Two Multicenter Controlled Clinical Trials

    Arden Christen;Bradley Beiswanger;Melissa Mau;Cheryl Walker

  • Partner behaviors that support quitting smoking.

    Sheldon Cohen;Edward Lichtenstein

  • Self-efficacy and smoking reexamined: construct validity and clinical utility.

    John S. Baer;Craig S. Holt;Edward Lichtenstein

  • Telephone counseling for smoking cessation: rationales and meta-analytic review of evidence

    E. Lichtenstein;R.E. Glasgow;H.A. Lando;D.J. Ossip-Klein

  • Partner support and relapse in smoking-cessation programs.

    Robin Mermelstein;Edward Lichtenstein;Karen McIntyre

  • Nurse-Assisted Counseling for Smokers in Primary Care

    Jack F. Hollis;Edward Lichtenstein;Thomas M. Vogt;Victor J. Stevens

  • Smoking onset among teens: An empirical analysis of initial situations☆

    Larry S. Friedman;Edward Lichtenstein;Anthony Biglan

  • Classification and prediction of smoking relapse episodes: an exploration of individual differences.

    John S. Baer;Edward Lichtenstein

  • Work site-based cancer prevention : Primary results from the working well trial

    Glorian Sorensen;Beti Thompson;Karen Glanz;Ziding Feng

  • Self-efficacy and relapse in smoking cessation: a replication and extension.

    K. O. McIntyre;Edward Lichtenstein;Robin J. Mermelstein

  • Biochemical validation of smoking status: Pros, cons, and data from four low-intensity intervention trials

    Russell E. Glasgow;John P. Mullooly;Thomas M. Vogt;Victor J. Stevens

  • Comparison of Rapid Smoking, Warm, Smoky Air, and Attention Placebo in the Modification of Smoking Behavior.

    Edward Lichtenstein;Darrel E. Harris;Gary R. Birchler;James M. Wahl

  • The behavioral assessment of social competence in males

    Unknown

  • Are higher doses of nicotine replacement more effective for smoking cessation

    John R. Hughes;George R. Lesmes;Dorothy K. Hatsukami;Robyn L. Richmond

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert H. Severson
Herbert H. Severson Oregon Research Institute
Judy A. Andrews
Judy A. Andrews Oregon Research Institute
Russell E. Glasgow
Russell E. Glasgow University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Dennis V. Ary
Dennis V. Ary Oregon Research Institute
Brian G. Danaher
Brian G. Danaher University of Oregon
Anthony Biglan
Anthony Biglan Oregon Research Institute
Sarah E. Hampson
Sarah E. Hampson Oregon Research Institute
John R. Seeley
John R. Seeley University of Oregon
Sheldon Cohen
Sheldon Cohen Carnegie Mellon University
John S. Baer
John S. Baer University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and rewarding careers. Many students are drawn to accelerated counseling psychology online programs, which offer a faster route to professional counseling roles while maintaining flexibility for balancing other commitments.

Those aiming for leadership positions can benefit from the fastest online doctoral programs in behavioral health leadership. These programs prepare graduates to manage behavioral health organizations and influence public policy.

If your interest lies in Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), the demand for behavior analysts is growing. The fast online masters in aba program enables you to advance your expertise in this high-impact field quickly.

For those fascinated by the intersection of psychology and the legal system, forensic psychology careers are both challenging and diverse. Graduates often work in law enforcement, court systems, or rehabilitation.

Exploring these pathways can help you find the best fit for your career goals as you pursue psychology studies in the US.

Best Scientists Citing Edward Lichtenstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles