World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
14946
World Ranking
2984
National Ranking
1710

David W. Wetter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Wetter sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 274 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

David W. Wetter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Wetter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David W. Wetter is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States and has contributed extensively to multiple fields of study, including medicine, psychology, and health professions. Their research activity spans a broad range of topics within these domains, with a significant focus on behavioral health, digital health interventions, and health policy.

The primary areas of study in their work encompass:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Health Professions

Their research also delves into several subfields, including:

  • General Health Professions
  • Applied Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Clinical Psychology

Key topics frequently addressed in their publications include:

  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet

David W. Wetter has co-authored research with several frequent collaborators, reflecting interdisciplinary teamwork. Notable co-authors include:

  • Cho Y. Lam
  • Guilherme Del Fiol
  • Inbal Nahum-Shani
  • Chelsey R. Schlechter
  • Kensaku Kawamoto

Their work is published in diverse scientific venues, with multiple publications appearing in:

  • Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • JMIR Research Protocols
  • BMJ Open

Selected recent papers by David W. Wetter illustrate the scope and impact of their research:

  • Application of community - engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity, 2021, Preventive Medicine Reports
  • Evaluation of Revised US Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Guideline Among Women and Racial/Ethnic Minority Populations, 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • Establishing a multidisciplinary initiative for interoperable electronic health record innovations at an academic medical center, 2021, JAMIA Open
  • Comparing models of delivery for cancer genetics services among patients receiving primary care who meet criteria for genetic evaluation in two healthcare systems: BRIDGE randomized controlled trial, 2021, BMC Health Services Research
  • Understanding the Prevalence of Prediabetes and Diabetes in Patients With Cancer in Clinical Practice: A Real-World Cohort Study, 2021, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

This body of work reflects a multidisciplinary approach integrating clinical, behavioral, and technological perspectives to address health equity, screening guidelines, electronic health records, genetics services, and comorbidities in cancer care.

Best Publications

  • Smoking as a risk factor for sleep-disordered breathing.

    David W. Wetter;Terry B. Young;Thomas R. Bidwell;M. Safwan Badr

  • Gender differences in smoking cessation.

    David W. Wetter;Susan L. Kenford;Stevens S. Smith;Michael C. Fiore

  • THE AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE POLICY AND RESEARCH SMOKING CESSATION CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE

    Michael C. Fiore;David W. Wetter;William C. Bailey;Glen Bennett

  • The relation between cigarette smoking and sleep disturbance.

    D.W. Wetter;T.B. Young

  • Theory as Mediating Variables: Why Aren't Community Interventions Working as Desired?

    Tom Baranowski;Lillian S. Lin;David W. Wetter;Ken Resnicow

  • Development and validation of the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale.

    Samuel K. Welsch;Stevens S. Smith;David W. Wetter;Douglas E. Jorenby

  • Predicting relapse back to smoking: contrasting affective and physical models of dependence.

    Susan L. Kenford;Stevens S. Smith;David W. Wetter;Douglas E. Jorenby

  • Prevalence and predictors of transitions in smoking behavior among college students.

    David W. Wetter;Susan L. Kenford;Samuel K. Welsch;Stevens S. Smith

  • Smoking outcome expectancies: factor structure, predictive validity, and discriminant validity.

    David W. Wetter;Stevens S. Smith;Susan L. Kenford;Douglas E. Jorenby

  • Ask-Advise-Connect: A New Approach to Smoking Treatment Delivery in Health Care Settings

    Jennifer Irvin Vidrine;Sanjay Shete;Yumei Cao;Anthony Greisinger

  • Mechanisms linking socioeconomic status to smoking cessation: a structural equation modeling approach.

    Michael S. Businelle;Darla E. Kendzor;Lorraine R. Reitzel;Tracy J. Costello

  • The effects of depressed mood on smoking cessation: mediation by postcessation self-efficacy.

    Paul M. Cinciripini;David W. Wetter;Rachel T. Fouladi;Janice A. Blalock

  • The effect of tobacco outlet density and proximity on smoking cessation.

    Lorraine R. Reitzel;Ellen K. Cromley;Yisheng Li;Yumei Cao

  • Development of the Brief Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives

    Stevens S. Smith;Megan E. Piper;Daniel M. Bolt;Michael C. Fiore

  • Pardon my gaffe: Effects of sex, status, and consequence severity on accounts.

    Marti Hope Gonzales;Julie Haugen Pederson;Debra J. Manning;David W. Wetter

  • Associations between health literacy and established predictors of smoking cessation.

    Diana W. Stewart;Claire E. Adams;Miguel A. Cano;Virmarie Correa-Fernández

  • Two Studies of the Clinical Effectiveness of the Nicotine Patch With Different Counseling Treatments

    Michael C. Fiore;Susan L. Kenford;Douglas E. Jorenby;David W. Wetter

  • Transitions out of High School: Time of Increased Cancer Risk?☆☆☆

    Tom Baranowski;Karen Weber Cullen;Karen Basen-Engquist;David W. Wetter

  • Financial strain and smoking cessation among racially/ethnically diverse smokers

    Darla E. Kendzor;Michael S. Businelle;Tracy J. Costello;Yessenia Castro

  • Effects of Varenicline and Bupropion Sustained-Release Use Plus Intensive Smoking Cessation Counseling on Prolonged Abstinence From Smoking and on Depression, Negative Affect, and Other Symptoms of Nicotine Withdrawal

    Paul M. Cinciripini;Jason D. Robinson;Maher Karam-Hage;Jennifer A. Minnix

  • Affect, expectancies, urges, and smoking: Do they conform to models of drug motivation and relapse?

    Thomas H. Brandon;David W. Wetter;Timothy B. Baker

Frequent Co-Authors

Darla E. Kendzor
Darla E. Kendzor University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Andrew J. Waters
Andrew J. Waters Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Miguel Ángel Cano
Miguel Ángel Cano The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Ellen R. Gritz
Ellen R. Gritz The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Thomas H. Brandon
Thomas H. Brandon University of South Florida
Michael J. Zvolensky
Michael J. Zvolensky University of Houston
James P. McCullough
James P. McCullough Virginia Commonwealth University
Bonnie Spring
Bonnie Spring Northwestern University
Daniel M. Bolt
Daniel M. Bolt University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens a wide range of career pathways, especially for those interested in counseling. Online programs are increasingly popular due to their flexibility, allowing students to balance their studies with personal and professional commitments.

The path to becoming a counselor in the USA varies by state, but many accelerated and online options exist. For example, those interested in the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Hawaii will find streamlined routes tailored to reduce licensing timelines. Similarly, the fastest way to become a counselor in Idaho offers step-by-step guidance for a swift transition to practice.

Programs such as the Illinois accelerated counseling programs are designed for those seeking a more direct route to licensure. Likewise, the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Indiana outlines the most efficient steps to enter the field. Online degrees are a practical option for students aiming to kickstart careers in counseling, therapy, school psychology, and related roles.

Best Scientists Citing David W. Wetter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles