World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
F. Joseph McClernon

F. Joseph McClernon

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5449 5061 2977 2701 145 9694

F. Joseph McClernon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by F. Joseph McClernon between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. F. Joseph McClernon published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2025. 32 of the 201 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2025. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 19 publications
1995 2025

201 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
F. Joseph McClernon: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 1
2004 5
2005 4
2006 3
2007 10
2008 7
2009 8
2010 6
2011 7
2012 12
2013 12
2014 8
2015 6
2016 8
2017 7
2018 13
2019 15
2020 5
2021 7
2022 11
2023 8
2024 13
2025 19
Total 201
Download as CSV

F. Joseph McClernon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Joseph McClernon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 145 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 145
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

F. Joseph McClernon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Joseph McClernon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

F. Joseph McClernon is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work spans multiple subfields including Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Applied Psychology, and General Health Professions.

The main topics covered in their research include Smoking Behavior and Cessation, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study, Health and Medical Research Impacts, and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by McClernon are:

  • A methodological checklist for fMRI drug cue reactivity studies: development and expert consensus, 2022, Nature Protocols
  • Trends in cannabis and tobacco co-use in the United States, 2002-2021, 2024, Addictive Behaviors
  • Multiple Tobacco Product Use Conceptual Framework: A 2021 Update on Evidence, 2022, Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • Relationships between the Nicotine Metabolite Ratio and a Panel of Exposure and Effect Biomarkers: Findings from Two Studies of U.S. Commercial Cigarette Smokers, 2020, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Parameter Space and Potential for Biomarker Development in 25 Years of fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity, 2024, JAMA Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with McClernon include Dana Rubenstein, Jason A. Oliver, Lauren R. Pacek, Maggie M. Sweitzer, and Dana Mowls Carroll.

McClernon's work has been published in several key venues relevant to their research focus. These frequently include Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, UNC Libraries, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, and Addictive Behaviors.

Best Publications

  • Nicotinic effects on cognitive function : behavioral characterization, pharmacological specification, and anatomic localization

    Edward D. Levin;F. Joseph McClernon;Amir H. Rezvani

  • Association Between Smoking and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in a Population-Based Sample of Young Adults

    Scott H. Kollins;F. Joseph McClernon;Bernard F. Fuemmeler

  • Randomized Trial of Reduced-Nicotine Standards for Cigarettes.

    Eric C. Donny;Rachel L. Denlinger;Jennifer W. Tidey;Joseph S. Koopmeiners

  • 24-h smoking abstinence potentiates fMRI-BOLD activation to smoking cues in cerebral cortex and dorsal striatum

    F. Joseph McClernon;Rachel V. Kozink;Avery M. Lutz;Jed E. Rose

  • Abstinence-Induced Changes in Self-Report Craving Correlate with Event-Related fMRI Responses to Smoking Cues

    F Joseph McClernon;F Berry Hiott;Scott A Huettel;Jed E Rose

  • Cannabinoid exposure and altered DNA methylation in rat and human sperm.

    Susan K. Murphy;Nilda Itchon-Ramos;Zachary Visco;Zhiqing Huang

  • Adverse childhood events are associated with obesity and disordered eating: results from a U.S. population-based survey of young adults.

    Bernard F. Fuemmeler;Eric Dedert;F. Joseph McClernon;Jean C. Beckham

  • Proximal versus distal cues to smoke: The effects of environments on smokers' cue-reactivity.

    Cynthia A. Conklin;Nathalie Robin;Kenneth A. Perkins;Ronald P. Salkeld

  • Remitted major depression is characterized by reward network hyperactivation during reward anticipation and hypoactivation during reward outcomes

    Gabriel S. Dichter;Rachel V. Kozink;F. Joseph McClernon;F. Joseph McClernon;Moria J. Smoski

  • Neurocognitive correlates of the effects of yoga meditation practice on emotion and cognition: a pilot study

    Brett E. Froeliger;Eric L. Garland;Leslie A. Modlin;F. Joseph McClernon

  • The effects of a low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet and a low-fat diet on mood, hunger, and other self-reported symptoms.

    F. Joseph McClernon;William S. Yancy;William S. Yancy;Jacqueline A. Eberstein;Robert C. Atkins

  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms Predict Nicotine Dependence and Progression to Regular Smoking from Adolescence to Young Adulthood

    Bernard F. Fuemmeler;Scott H. Kollins;F. Joseph McClernon

  • Effects of quitting smoking on EEG activation and attention last for more than 31 days and are more severe with stress, dependence, DRD2 A1 allele, and depressive traits

    David G. Gilbert;F. Joseph McClernon;Norka E. Rabinovich;Chihiro Sugai

  • Effect of immediate vs gradual reduction in nicotine content of cigarettes on biomarkers of smoke exposure a randomized clinical trial

    Dorothy K. Hatsukami;Xianghua Luo;Joni A. Jensen;Mustafa Al'Absi

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the superior frontal gyrus modulates craving for cigarettes.

    Jed E. Rose;F. Joseph McClernon;F. Joseph McClernon;Brett Froeliger;Frédérique M. Behm

  • Yoga Meditation Practitioners Exhibit Greater Gray Matter Volume and Fewer Reported Cognitive Failures: Results of a Preliminary Voxel-Based Morphometric Analysis

    Brett Froeliger;Eric L. Garland;F. Joseph McClernon

  • Automatic affective responses to smoking cues.

    B. Keith Payne;F. Joseph McClernon;Ian G. Dobbins

  • Cognitive enhancers for the treatment of ADHD.

    L. Cinnamon Bidwell;F. Joseph McClernon;F. Joseph McClernon;Scott H. Kollins

  • Meditation-State Functional Connectivity (msFC): Strengthening of the Dorsal Attention Network and Beyond

    Brett Froeliger;Eric L. Garland;Rachel V. Kozink;Leslie A. Modlin

  • Transdermal nicotine attenuates depression symptoms in nonsmokers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    F. Joseph McClernon;F. Berry Hiott;Eric C. Westman;Jed E. Rose

  • Selectively reduced responses to smoking cues in amygdala following extinction-based smoking cessation: results of a preliminary functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    F. Joseph McClernon;F. Berry Hiott;Jim Liu;Alfred N. Salley

  • Mood disturbance fails to resolve across 31 days of cigarette abstinence in women

    David G. Gilbert;F. Joseph McClernon;Norka E. Rabinovich;Louisette C. Plath

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott H. Kollins
Scott H. Kollins Duke University
Jean C. Beckham
Jean C. Beckham Duke University
Jed E. Rose
Jed E. Rose Duke University
Eric C. Donny
Eric C. Donny Wake Forest University
Dorothy K. Hatsukami
Dorothy K. Hatsukami University of Minnesota
David G. Gilbert
David G. Gilbert Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Jennifer W. Tidey
Jennifer W. Tidey Brown University
Michelle F. Dennis
Michelle F. Dennis Duke University
Mustafa al'Absi
Mustafa al'Absi University of Minnesota
Neal L. Benowitz
Neal L. Benowitz University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a range of career pathways, from counseling and mental health services to research and human resources. Online study options offer flexibility—ideal for working professionals or those balancing other commitments—while still providing the rigorous training needed for success in this diverse field.

When considering programs, look for accredited schools that offer robust online resources and strong student support. Regional offerings can be insightful—see the top psychology programs in Phoenix, the top psychology programs in Raleigh, and the top psychology programs in Reno to compare opportunities in different cities. Additionally, explore the best psychology degree rankings in South Dakota for insight into program quality and outcomes.

Graduates of accredited online psychology programs can pursue roles as therapists, case managers, research assistants, or continue on to advanced graduate study. Understanding local program options and career trends will help you make informed decisions about your path in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing F. Joseph McClernon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles