World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 31 11041 10334 5757 5257 103 8956

James P. McCullough publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James P. McCullough between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James P. McCullough published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2014. 22 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2014. 1972: 5 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 3 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 10 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 13 publications
1972 2025

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James P. McCullough: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 5
1973 1
1974 1
1975 3
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 2
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 3
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 0
1990 2
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 4
1995 1
1996 2
1997 1
1998 3
1999 2
2000 5
2001 1
2002 4
2003 7
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 1
2008 2
2009 0
2010 3
2011 2
2012 8
2013 2
2014 26
2015 0
2016 3
2017 2
2018 0
2019 1
2020 2
2021 1
2022 1
2023 10
2024 9
2025 13
Total 146
Download as CSV

James P. McCullough publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James P. McCullough sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 103
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James P. McCullough D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James P. McCullough sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398 31
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James P. McCullough is affiliated with Virginia Commonwealth University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a total of 98 publications contributing to this area.

Their work focuses on several subfields within medicine, including:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Nephrology
  • Epidemiology

Main topics of James P. McCullough's research include:

  • Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Renal function and acid-base balance
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation

James P. McCullough has contributed to several recent papers in notable journals. These include:

  • Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit: incidence, patient characteristics, timing, trajectory, treatment, and associated outcomes. A multicenter, observational study (2023, Intensive Care Medicine)
  • Fibrinogen Early In Severe Trauma studY (FEISTY): results from an Australian multicentre randomised controlled pilot trial (2021, Critical Care and Resuscitation)
  • Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-based child maltreatment profiles to predict efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus non-specific psychotherapy in adults with early-onset chronic depression: cluster analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial (2024, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • Fludrocortisone dose-response relationship in septic shock: a randomised phase II trial (2024, Intensive Care Medicine)
  • PREdiction and Diagnosis using Imaging and Clinical biomarkers Trial in Traumatic Brain Injury (PREDICT-TBI) study protocol: an observational, prospective, multicentre cohort study for the prediction of outcome in moderate-to-severe TBI (2023, BMJ Open)

The scientist has published frequently in these venues:

  • Critical Care and Resuscitation
  • Emergency Medicine Australasia
  • Research Square
  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Journal of Critical Care

Collaborations have involved recurrent co-authors such as:

  • Kyle White
  • Kevin B. Laupland
  • Alexis Tabah
  • Kiran Shekar
  • Mahesh Ramanan

Best Publications

  • A comparison of nefazodone, the cognitive behavioral-analysis system of psychotherapy, and their combination for the treatment of chronic depression.

    Martin B. Keller;James P. McCullough;Daniel N. Klein;Bruce Arnow

  • Differential responses to psychotherapy versus pharmacotherapy in patients with chronic forms of major depression and childhood trauma

    Charles B. Nemeroff;Christine M. Heim;Michael E. Thase;Daniel N. Klein

  • Gender differences in treatment response to sertraline versus imipramine in chronic depression.

    Susan G. Kornstein;Alan F. Schatzberg;Michael E. Thase;Kimberly A. Yonkers

  • Gender differences in chronic major and double depression.

    S.G Kornstein;A.F Schatzberg;M.E Thase;K.A Yonkers

  • Therapeutic alliance in depression treatment: controlling for prior change and patient characteristics.

    Daniel N. Klein;Joseph E. Schwartz;Neil J. Santiago;Dina Vivian

  • Results of the DSM-IV mood disorders field trial

    Martin B. Keller;Daniel N. Klein;Robert M.A. Hirschfeld;James H. Kocsis

  • Age of onset in chronic major depression: relation to demographic and clinical variables, family history, and treatment response

    Daniel N Klein;Alan F Schatzberg;James P McCullough;Frank Dowling

  • Maintenance Phase Efficacy of Sertraline for Chronic Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    M B Keller;J H Kocsis;M E Thase;A J Gelenberg

  • The Treatment of Chronic Depression, Part 2: A Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Sertraline and Imipramine

    Martin B. Keller;Alan J. Gelenberg;Robert M.A. Hirschfeld;A. John Rush

  • Treatment for chronic depression using Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP).

    James P. McCullough

  • Cognitive-Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy as a Maintenance Treatment for Chronic Depression.

    Daniel N. Klein;Neil J. Santiago;Dina Vivian;Janice A. Blalock

  • Comparison of DSM-III-R chronic major depression and major depression superimposed on dysthymia (double depression): validity of the distinction.

    James P. McCullough;Daniel N. Klein;Martin B. Keller;Charles E. Holzer

  • Group comparisons of DSM-IV subtypes of chronic depression: validity of the distinctions, part 2.

    James P. McCullough;Daniel N. Klein;Frances E. Borian;Robert H. Howland

  • Therapist Variables That Predict Symptom Change in Psychotherapy With Chronically Depressed Outpatients.

    Carina Vocisano;Daniel N. Klein;Bruce Arnow;Caridad Rivera

  • Cognitive-Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy: An Interactional Treatment Approach for Dysthymic Disorder

    James P. McCullough

  • Psychotherapy for Dysthymia: A Naturalistic Study of Ten Patients

    James P. McCullough

  • Effects of an intensive depression-focused intervention for smoking cessation in pregnancy.

    Paul M Cinciripini;Janice Blalock;Jennifer Anne Minnix;Jason D Robinson

  • Chronic depression and comorbid personality disorders: response to sertraline versus imipramine.

    James M. Russell;Susan G. Kornstein;M. Tracie Shea;James P. McCullough

  • Early- versus late-onset dysthymic disorder: comparison in out-patients with superimposed major depressive episodes

    Daniel N Klein;Alan F Schatzberg;James P McCullough;Martin B Keller

  • Patient's therapeutic skill acquisition and response to psychotherapy, alone or in combination with medication.

    Rachel Manber;B. Arnow;C. Blasey;D. Vivian

  • Human Change Processes: The Scientific Foundation of Psychotherapy

    James P. McCullough

Frequent Co-Authors

Elisabeth Schramm
Elisabeth Schramm University of Freiburg
Martin B. Keller
Martin B. Keller Brown University
Michael E. Thase
Michael E. Thase University of Pennsylvania
Daniel N. Klein
Daniel N. Klein Stony Brook University
John C. Markowitz
John C. Markowitz Columbia University
Barbara O. Rothbaum
Barbara O. Rothbaum Emory University
Alan F. Schatzberg
Alan F. Schatzberg Stanford University
Rachel Manber
Rachel Manber Stanford University
Bruce A. Arnow
Bruce A. Arnow Stanford University
A. John Rush
A. John Rush Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning an online psychology degree in the USA offers outstanding flexibility, making it ideal for students balancing work or family commitments. However, affordability is a key consideration when choosing a program. Several states offer notable options for budget-conscious learners. For example, the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in Colorado provides quality education at a lower cost, making it accessible to more students.

Florida is another state known for affordable online learning, with the Florida cheapest online psychology bachelor's degree program. Similarly, students seeking value will find competitive tuition rates in the Georgia cheapest online psychology bachelor's degree offerings. Minnesota also ranks high for student value, thanks to its affordable online psychology bachelor's programs in Minnesota.

Graduates can pursue various career pathways, from human resources and counseling to social services or research. Many online degrees also prepare students for advanced study at the master’s or doctoral level—a requirement for specialized roles like clinical psychology. Exploring affordable programs helps minimize debt and expands your options after graduation.

Best Scientists Citing James P. McCullough

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles