World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5797
World Ranking
9805
National Ranking
29

Liane Kaufmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liane Kaufmann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Liane Kaufmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liane Kaufmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Liane Kaufmann is affiliated with the Health Science University in Japan and has a research portfolio focused primarily within the social sciences and psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields, including education, statistics and probability, developmental and educational psychology, clinical psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research addresses key topics such as cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, mathematics education and teaching techniques, reading and literacy development, educational and psychological assessments, youth substance use and school attendance, early childhood education and development, and broader education methods and practices.

Notable recent publications by Liane Kaufmann include:

  • Self-efficacy matters: Influence of students' perceived self-efficacy on statistics anxiety, 2022, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • Developmental Dyscalculia in Adults, 2020, Lernen und Lernstörungen
  • Pain and Associated Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Patients Suffering from Dementia: Challenges at Different Levels and Proposal of a Conceptual Framework, 2021, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Frequent coauthors in Kaufmann's research include Michael von Aster, Martin Schöfl, Irene Corvacho del Toro, Elisabeth M. Weiss, and Elise Klein. Collaboration with these scholars appears across various publications, contributing to a diverse research network.

Kaufmann's work is frequently published in the journal Lernen und Lernstörungen, with a total of 20 publications, and also appears in Brain Sciences, Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, and the American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®.

Best Publications

  • Math Anxiety and Math Ability in Early Primary School Years

    Helga Krinzinger;Liane Kaufmann;Klaus Willmes

  • Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: an event-related fMRI study

    Liane Kaufmann;Florian Koppelstaetter;Margarete Delazer;Christian M. Siedentopf

  • Learning by strategies and learning by drill--evidence from an fMRI study.

    Margarete Delazer;Anja Ischebeck;Frank Domahs;Laura Zamarian

  • Meta-analyses of developmental fMRI studies investigating typical and atypical trajectories of number processing and calculation.

    Liane Kaufmann;Guilherme Wood;Orly Rubinsten;Avishai Henik

  • Dyscalculia from a developmental and differential perspective

    Liane Kaufmann;Michèle M. Mazzocco;Ann Dowker;Michael von Aster;Michael von Aster;Michael von Aster

  • Early place-value understanding as a precursor for later arithmetic performance--a longitudinal study on numerical development.

    K. Moeller;S. Pixner;J. Zuber;L. Kaufmann;L. Kaufmann

  • The diagnosis and management of dyscalculia.

    Liane Kaufmann;Michael von Aster

  • Children's early mental number line: logarithmic or decomposed linear?

    Korbinian Moeller;Silvia Pixner;Liane Kaufmann;Hans Christoph Nuerk

  • A developmental fMRI study of nonsymbolic numerical and spatial processing.

    Liane Kaufmann;Stephan E. Vogel;Guilherme Wood;Christian Kremser

  • On the development of the mental number line: more, less, or never holistic with increasing age?

    Hans-Christoph Nuerk;Liane Kaufmann;Sabine Zoppoth;Klaus Willmes

  • Neural correlates of the number-size interference task in children.

    Liane Kaufmann;Florian Koppelstaetter;Christian Siedentopf;Ilka Haala

  • Evaluation of a Numeracy Intervention Program Focusing on Basic Numerical Knowledge and Conceptual Knowledge A Pilot Study

    Liane Kaufmann;Pia Handl;Brigitte Thöny

  • Partial 7q11.23 deletions further implicate GTF2I and GTF2IRD1 as the main genes responsible for the Williams-Beuren syndrome neurocognitive profile

    A Antonell;M Del Campo;L F Magano;L Kaufmann

  • Developmental dyscalculia: Compensatory mechanisms in left intraparietal regions in response to nonsymbolic magnitudes

    Liane Kaufmann;Stephan E Vogel;Stephan E Vogel;Marc Starke;Christian Kremser

  • Interventions for improving numerical abilities: Present and future

    Roi Cohen Kadosh;Ann Dowker;Angela Heine;Liane Kaufmann

  • Dyscalculia: neuroscience and education.

    Liane Kaufmann

  • Basic number processing deficits in developmental dyscalculia: Evidence from eye tracking

    K Moeller;S Neuburger;Liane Kaufmann;Liane Kaufmann;K Landerl

  • More Evidence for the Role of the Central Executive in Retrieving Arithmetic Facts – A Case Study of Severe Developmental Dyscalculia

    Liane Kaufmann

  • Numerical and non-numerical ordinality processing in children with and without developmental dyscalculia: Evidence from fMRI

    Liane Kaufmann;S Vogel;M Starke;M Starke;C Kremser

  • Deficient arithmetic fact retrieval--storage or access problem? A case study.

    Liane Kaufmann;Aliette Lochy;Aliette Lochy;Arthur Drexler;Carlo Semenza

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Hans-Christoph Nuerk University of Tübingen
Korbinian Moeller
Korbinian Moeller University of Tübingen
Margarete Delazer
Margarete Delazer Innsbruck Medical University
Klaus Willmes
Klaus Willmes RWTH Aachen University
Guilherme Wood
Guilherme Wood University of Graz
Anja Ischebeck
Anja Ischebeck University of Graz
Gerd Schulte-Körne
Gerd Schulte-Körne Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Elisabeth M. Weiss
Elisabeth M. Weiss University of Innsbruck
Carlo Semenza
Carlo Semenza University of Padua
Ilona Papousek
Ilona Papousek University of Graz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for mental health professionals grows, many students are considering online pathways to launch or advance their psychology careers. Online counseling degrees offer flexibility and accessibility, making it easier for busy individuals to pursue higher education while balancing work or family commitments.

If you’re located in California, exploring the easiest online counseling degrees in Los Angeles can be a convenient option. Similarly, those in Pennsylvania can benefit from insights provided in the easiest online counseling master's degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania.

For a broader national perspective, the easiest counseling online master's programs in USA showcase top online degrees tailored for aspiring counselors across the country. You might also explore the easiest online counseling programs in the United States to identify options that match your academic background and career aspirations.

Whether your goal is to work in school counseling, clinical settings, or private practice, researching accredited and reputable online programs is essential. These pathways can open doors to rewarding careers in mental health and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Liane Kaufmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles