World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Guilherme Wood

Guilherme Wood

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
7197
World Ranking
7010
National Ranking
34

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
7346
World Ranking
7186
National Ranking
44

Guilherme Wood publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guilherme Wood sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 133 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Guilherme Wood D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guilherme Wood sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guilherme Wood is affiliated with the University of Graz in Austria and specializes in neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and related subfields. Their research encompasses a range of topics within neural and behavioral psychology, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, as well as functional brain connectivity studies.

The scientist's recent publications reflect a broad engagement with the field, including studies published in prominent journals. Notable papers include:

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, Brain
  • Game-based learning environments affect frontal brain activity, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • How Much Do Strategy Reports Tell About the Outcomes of Neurofeedback Training? A Study on the Voluntary Up-Regulation of the Sensorimotor Rhythm, 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • To Add or Not to Add Game Elements? Exploring the Effects of Different Cognitive Task Designs Using Eye Tracking, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
  • Self-efficacy matters: Influence of students' perceived self-efficacy on statistics anxiety, 2022, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Guilherme Wood frequently publishes in several scientific venues, with the highest number of contributions appearing in:

  • PLoS ONE
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Lernen und Lernstörungen
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Collaborative work plays a significant role in their research. Frequent co-authors include Silvia Erika Kober, Jan Willem Koten, Lisa Maria Berger, Manuel Ninaus, and Christa Neuper, indicating active involvement in interdisciplinary and multi-author studies.

Their primary areas of study are within neuroscience and encompass the following subfields:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Clinical Psychology

Research topics covered by Guilherme Wood extend into specific domains such as:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Best Publications

  • On the cognitive link between space and number: a meta-analysis of the SNARC effect

    Guilherme Wood;Klaus Willmes;Hans-Christoph Nuerk;Martin H. Fischer

  • The universal SNARC effect: the association between number magnitude and space is amodal.

    Hans-Christoph Nuerk;Guilherme Wood;Klaus Willmes

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist)

    Tomas Ros;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Vadim Zotev;Kymberly D Young

  • Meta-analyses of developmental fMRI studies investigating typical and atypical trajectories of number processing and calculation.

    Liane Kaufmann;Guilherme Wood;Orly Rubinsten;Avishai Henik

  • Learning to modulate one's own brain activity: the effect of spontaneous mental strategies

    Silvia Erika Kober;Matthias Witte;Manuel Ninaus;Christa Neuper

  • Naming speed in dyslexia and dyscalculia

    Edith Willburger;Barbara Fussenegger;Kristina Moll;Guilherme Wood

  • A developmental fMRI study of nonsymbolic numerical and spatial processing.

    Liane Kaufmann;Stephan E. Vogel;Guilherme Wood;Christian Kremser

  • Control beliefs can predict the ability to up-regulate sensorimotor rhythm during neurofeedback training

    Matthias Witte;Silvia Erika Kober;Manuel Ninaus;Christa Neuper

  • Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: a failure to replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993).

    Guilherme Wood;Hans Christoph Nuerk;Klaus Willmes

  • Shutting down sensorimotor interference unblocks the networks for stimulus processing: An SMR neurofeedback training study

    Silvia Erika Kober;Matthias Witte;Matthias Stangl;Aleksander Väljamäe

  • Developmental dyscalculia: Compensatory mechanisms in left intraparietal regions in response to nonsymbolic magnitudes

    Liane Kaufmann;Stephan E Vogel;Stephan E Vogel;Marc Starke;Christian Kremser

  • Neural substrates of cognitive control under the belief of getting neurofeedback training

    Manuel Ninaus;Silvia Erika Kober;Matthias Witte;Karl Koschutnig

  • Specific effects of EEG based neurofeedback training on memory functions in post-stroke victims

    Silvia Erika Kober;Daniela Schweiger;Matthias Witte;Johanna Louise Reichert

  • Near-infrared spectroscopy based neurofeedback training increases specific motor imagery related cortical activation compared to sham feedback

    S.E. Kober;G. Wood;J. Kurzmann;E.V.C. Friedrich;E.V.C. Friedrich

  • Genetic Contribution to Variation in Cognitive Function: An fMRI Study in Twins

    Jan Willem Koten;Jan Willem Koten;Guilherme Wood;Peter Hagoort;Rainer Goebel;Rainer Goebel

  • A Hand Full of Numbers: A Role for Offloading in Arithmetics Learning?

    Annelise Júlio Costa;Júlia Beatriz Lopes Silva;Pedro Pinheiro Chagas;Helga Krinzinger

  • Considering structural connectivity in the triple code model of numerical cognition: differential connectivity for magnitude processing and arithmetic facts

    Elise Klein;Julia Suchan;Korbinian Moeller;Hans-Otto Karnath

  • Game elements improve performance in a working memory training task

    Manuel Ninaus;Gonçalo Duarte Garcia Pereira;René Stefitz;Rui Prada

  • Virtual reality in neurologic rehabilitation of spatial disorientation.

    Silvia Erika Kober;Guilherme Wood;Daniela Hofer;Walter Kreuzig

  • Transcoding abilities in typical and atypical mathematics achievers: the role of working memory and procedural and lexical competencies.

    Ricardo Moura;Guilherme Wood;Pedro Pinheiro-Chagas;Jan Lonnemann;Jan Lonnemann

Frequent Co-Authors

Christa Neuper
Christa Neuper University of Graz
Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Hans-Christoph Nuerk University of Tübingen
Klaus Willmes
Klaus Willmes RWTH Aachen University
Korbinian Moeller
Korbinian Moeller University of Tübingen
Karl Koschutnig
Karl Koschutnig University of Graz
Liane Kaufmann
Liane Kaufmann Health Science University
Stephan Vogel
Stephan Vogel University of Graz
Anja Ischebeck
Anja Ischebeck University of Graz
Christian Enzinger
Christian Enzinger Medical University of Graz
John Gruzelier
John Gruzelier Goldsmiths University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Neuroscience in the USA opens the door to various promising careers, many of which rank among the most lucrative college majors. Positions in neuroscience, data science, healthcare, and biotech are in high demand—and these fields are known for competitive salaries and strong job growth.

For those seeking flexibility, many accredited universities now offer online neuroscience degrees. Students who need financial support can find online colleges that take financial aid, making a quality education more accessible and affordable.

In addition to degrees, professionals can enhance their credentials through online certifications that pay well. Popular options include certifications in data analysis, research methods, and medical technology, all of which pair well with neuroscience backgrounds.

If you prefer a more streamlined path, consider the easiest online bachelor's degree options that still align with your interests. These choices allow you to build a foundation in science while balancing education with life’s demands.

Best Scientists Citing Guilherme Wood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles