World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marc J. M. Bonten

Marc J. M. Bonten

Award Badge
Microbiology
Netherlands
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 120 143 129 8 8 702 55006
Medicine 131 2379 2216 91 90 825 70646

Marc J. M. Bonten publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marc J. M. Bonten between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marc J. M. Bonten published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 26.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 67 publications in 2021. 65 of the 941 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 67. Peak 67 publications in 2021. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 45 publications 2012: 44 publications 2013: 43 publications 2014: 44 publications 2015: 56 publications 2016: 60 publications 2017: 58 publications 2018: 39 publications 2019: 41 publications 2020: 55 publications 2021: 67 publications 2022: 46 publications 2023: 39 publications 2024: 39 publications 2025: 26 publications
1990 2025

941 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marc J. M. Bonten: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 5
1994 6
1995 6
1996 7
1997 8
1998 7
1999 7
2000 7
2001 14
2002 6
2003 17
2004 13
2005 15
2006 20
2007 21
2008 17
2009 32
2010 28
2011 45
2012 44
2013 43
2014 44
2015 56
2016 60
2017 58
2018 39
2019 41
2020 55
2021 67
2022 46
2023 39
2024 39
2025 26
Total 941
Download as CSV

Marc J. M. Bonten publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc J. M. Bonten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 679+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 702 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99 702
Download as CSV

Marc J. M. Bonten D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc J. M. Bonten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 120 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11 120
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Microbiology in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Microbiology in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Marc J. M. Bonten is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and focuses primarily on medical research. Their work encompasses a significant volume of publications, reflecting a broad engagement with various aspects of medicine, especially in infectious diseases and epidemiology.

The scientist's main field of study is Medicine, with notable emphasis on several subfields including Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Medicine, Immunology, and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Their research topics cover a diverse range of critical areas:

  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Antibiotic Use and Resistance

Marc J. M. Bonten has contributed to frequently published venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Microbiology and Infection
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Their recent research works include several high-impact papers, such as:

  • "Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal" (2020, BMJ)
  • "Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19" (2021, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research" (2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases)
  • "Therapeutic Anticoagulation with Heparin in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19" (2021, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "Prevalence and Outcomes of Infection Among Patients in Intensive Care Units in 2017" (2020, JAMA)

The scientist frequently collaborates with several colleagues, including:

  • Cornelis H. van Werkhoven
  • Olaf L. Cremer
  • Tom van der Poll
  • Lennie Derde
  • Herman Goossens

Best Publications

  • Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal

    Laure Wynants;Laure Wynants;Ben Van Calster;Ben Van Calster;Gary S Collins;Gary S Collins;Richard D Riley

  • Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19.

    Morris J Brown;William Alazawi;Stavroula Kanoni

  • A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research

    John C. Marshall;Srinivas Murthy;Janet Diaz;Neil Adhikari

  • Polysaccharide Conjugate Vaccine against Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Adults

    Marc J.M. Bonten;Susanne M. Huijts;Marieke Bolkenbaas;Chris Webber

  • Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised prevention studies

    Wilhelmina G. Melsen;Maroeska M. Rovers;Maroeska M. Rovers;Rolf H.H. Groenwold;Dennis C.J.J. Bergmans

  • Prevalence and Outcomes of Infection Among Patients in Intensive Care Units in 2017.

    Jean Louis Vincent;Yasser Sakr;Mervyn Singer;Ignacio Martin-Loeches

  • Dutch patients, retail chicken meat and poultry share the same ESBL genes, plasmids and strains.

    M. A. Leverstein-van Hall;C. M. Dierikx;J. Cohen Stuart;G. M. Voets

  • Effect of Hydrocortisone on Mortality and Organ Support in Patients With Severe COVID-19: The REMAP-CAP COVID-19 Corticosteroid Domain Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Derek C. Angus;Lennie Derde;Farah Al-Beidh

  • Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study.

    Mirjam E Kretzschmar;Ganna Rozhnova;Ganna Rozhnova;Martin C J Bootsma;Martin C J Bootsma;Michiel van Boven

  • The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the predictive values of results from meta‐analyses

    W.G. Melsen;M.C.J. Bootsma;M.C.J. Bootsma;M.M. Rovers;M.J.M. Bonten

  • Global Spread of Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium from Distinct Nosocomial Genetic Complex

    Rob J L Willems;Janetta Top;Marga van Santen;D Ashley Robinson

  • Oral Decontamination with Chlorhexidine Reduces the Incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia

    Mirelle Koeman;Andre J. A. M. van der Ven;Eelko Hak;Hans C. A. Joore

  • Global Spread of Vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faeciumfrom Distinct Nosocomial Genetic Complex

    Rob J.L. Willems;Janetta Top;Marga van Santen;D. Ashley Robinson

  • Broad defects in the energy metabolism of leukocytes underlie immunoparalysis in sepsis

    Shih Chin Cheng;Brendon P. Scicluna;Rob J W Arts;Mark S. Gresnigt

  • Classification of patients with sepsis according to blood genomic endotype: a prospective cohort study

    Brendon P Scicluna;Lonneke A van Vught;Aeilko H Zwinderman;Maryse A Wiewel

  • The role of "colonization pressure" in the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: an important infection control variable.

    Marc J. M. Bonten;Sarah Slaughter;Anton W. Ambergen;Mary K. Hayden

  • Incidence, Risk Factors, and Attributable Mortality of Secondary Infections in the Intensive Care Unit After Admission for Sepsis

    Lonneke A van Vught;Peter M C Klein Klouwenberg;Cristian Spitoni;Brendon P Scicluna

  • Epidemiology of colonisation of patients and environment with vancomycin-resistant enterococci

    Marc J M Bonten;Mary K Hayden;Catherine Nathan;Jean van Voorhis

  • Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: why are they here, and where do they come from?

    Marc J M Bonten;Rob Willems;Robert A Weinstein

  • Vancomycin-resistant enterococci in intensive-care hospital settings: Transmission dynamics, persistence, and the impact of infection control programs

    Daren J. Austin;Marc J. M. Bonten;Robert A. Weinstein;Sarah Slaughter

  • Reduction in Acquisition of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus after Enforcement of Routine Environmental Cleaning Measures

    Mary K. Hayden;Marc J. M. Bonten;Donald W. Blom;Elizabeth A. Lyle

  • Feasibility and effects of the semirecumbent position to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia: a randomized study.

    Christianne A. van Nieuwenhoven;Christine Vandenbroucke-Grauls;Frank H. van Tiel;Hans C. A. Joore

Frequent Co-Authors

Rob J. L. Willems
Rob J. L. Willems Utrecht University
Jan Kluytmans
Jan Kluytmans Utrecht University
Tom van der Poll
Tom van der Poll University of Amsterdam
Marcus J. Schultz
Marcus J. Schultz University of Amsterdam
Ad C. Fluit
Ad C. Fluit Utrecht University
Willem van Schaik
Willem van Schaik University of Birmingham
Janetta Top
Janetta Top Utrecht University
Robert A. Weinstein
Robert A. Weinstein Rush University Medical Center
Herman Goossens
Herman Goossens University of Antwerp
Christian Brun-Buisson
Christian Brun-Buisson Institut Pasteur

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to various healthcare and scientific careers. Many students explore online healthcare degrees to complement their microbiology background, offering convenience and flexibility while gaining vital medical knowledge.

For those interested in public health, pursuing an online public health masters programs easy to get into can provide a practical pathway. These programs focus on disease prevention and health promotion, which aligns well with microbiology’s core principles.

Microbiology graduates might also consider specialized roles such as becoming a child life specialist, a career centered on supporting children through medical challenges. This path highlights the importance of combining scientific knowledge with empathetic care.

Additionally, those facing unique challenges can explore degrees for felons to resume their educational journey. These options promote inclusivity and offer many opportunities for advancement in science and healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Marc J. M. Bonten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles