World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
11059
World Ranking
16092
National Ranking
1273

Willem van Schaik publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Willem van Schaik sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 129 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Willem van Schaik D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Willem van Schaik sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Willem van Schaik is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on Medicine. They have produced 115 publications within Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology and 53 within Medicine.

The scientist's subfields of study include Molecular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Infectious Diseases, and Epidemiology. Their main research topics cover a variety of areas related to microbial and antibiotic resistance, such as Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria, Gut Microbiota and Health, Bacterial Biofilms and Quorum Sensing, Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus, Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy, Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, and Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing.

Willem van Schaik has frequently published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Microbial Genomics, Nature Communications, Microbiology Spectrum, and the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. These reflect the scientist's concentration on microbiology and antimicrobial resistance fields.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in the human gut microbiome, 2020, Current Opinion in Microbiology
  • Effects of early-life antibiotics on the developing infant gut microbiome and resistome: a randomized trial, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Plasmids Shaped the Recent Emergence of the Major Nosocomial Pathogen Enterococcus faecium, 2020, mBio
  • A Pilot Integrative Analysis of Colonic Gene Expression, Gut Microbiota, and Immune Infiltration in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis-Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Association of Disease With Bile Acid Pathways, 2020, Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
  • Antibiotic resistance in the commensal human gut microbiota, 2022, Current Opinion in Microbiology

Collaborations constitute a significant part of van Schaik's work, with frequent coauthors including Robert A. Moran, Alan McNally, Xiaoting Hua, Yunsong Yu, and Ross S. McInnes. These collaborative efforts span dozens of joint publications, underscoring a networked approach to addressing challenging questions in microbial genomics and antimicrobial resistance.

Best Publications

  • Emergence of Epidemic Multidrug-Resistant Enterococcus faecium from Animal and Commensal Strains

    François Lebreton;François Lebreton;Willem van Schaik;Willem van Schaik;Willem van Schaik;Abigail Manson McGuire Manson McGuire;Paul Godfrey

  • Whole-Genome Sequencing of Bacterial Pathogens: the Future of Nosocomial Outbreak Analysis

    Scott Quainoo;Jordy P. M. Coolen;Sacha A. F. T. van Hijum;Martijn A. Huynen

  • Global Emergence and Dissemination of Enterococci as Nosocomial Pathogens : Attack of the Clones?

    Ana M. Guzman Prieto;Willem van Schaik;Malbert R. C. Rogers;Teresa M. Coque

  • Dissemination of Cephalosporin Resistance Genes between Escherichia coli Strains from Farm Animals and Humans by Specific Plasmid Lineages

    Mark de Been;Val F. Lanza;María de Toro;Jelle Scharringa

  • The human gut resistome

    Willem van Schaik

  • Core Genome Multilocus Sequence Typing Scheme for High-Resolution Typing of Enterococcus faecium

    Mark de Been;Mette Pinholt;Mette Pinholt;Janetta Top;Stefan Bletz

  • Genomic transition of enterococci from gut commensals to leading causes of multidrug-resistant hospital infection in the antibiotic era.

    Michael S. Gilmore;Francois Herve Lebreton;Willem van Schaik;Willem van Schaik

  • Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in the human gut microbiome.

    Ross S McInnes;Gregory E McCallum;Lisa E Lamberte;Willem van Schaik

  • Pyrosequencing-based comparative genome analysis of the nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecium and identification of a large transferable pathogenicity island

    Willem van Schaik;Janetta Top;David R Riley;Jos Boekhorst

  • The role of sigmaB in the stress response of Gram-positive bacteria -- targets for food preservation and safety.

    Willem van Schaik;Tjakko Abee

  • On the (im)possibility of reconstructing plasmids from whole-genome short-read sequencing data.

    Sergio Arredondo-Alonso;Rob J. Willems;Willem van Schaik;Willem van Schaik;Anita C. Schürch

  • Restricted Gene Flow among Hospital Subpopulations of Enterococcus faecium

    Rob J L Willems;Janetta Top;Willem van Schaik;Helen Leavis

  • Antibiotic resistant enterococci-tales of a drug resistance gene trafficker.

    Guido Werner;Teresa M. Coque;Charles M.A.P. Franz;Elisabeth Grohmann

  • Transition of Enterococcus faecium from commensal organism to nosocomial pathogen.

    Rob Jl Willems;Willem van Schaik

  • Prediction of the intestinal resistome by a three-dimensional structure-based method.

    Etienne Ruppé;Etienne Ruppé;Amine Ghozlane;Amine Ghozlane;Julien Tap;Nicolas Pons

  • Identification of proteins involved in the heat stress response of Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579

    Paula M. Periago;Willem van Schaik;Tjakko Abee;Jeroen A. Wouters

  • Acid-adapted Listeria monocytogenes displays enhanced tolerance against the lantibiotics nisin and lacticin 3147.

    Willem van Schaik;Cormac G. M. Gahan;Colin Hill

  • LPxTG surface proteins of enterococci

    Antoni P.A. Hendrickx;Rob J.L. Willems;Marc J.M. Bonten;Willem van Schaik

  • In-depth resistome analysis by targeted metagenomics

    Val F. Lanza;Fernando Baquero;José Luís Martínez;Ricardo Ramos-Ruíz

  • Complement resistance mechanisms of Klebsiella pneumoniae

    Dennis J. Doorduijn;Suzan H.M. Rooijakkers;Willem van Schaik;Bart W. Bardoel

Frequent Co-Authors

Rob J. L. Willems
Rob J. L. Willems Utrecht University
Marc J. M. Bonten
Marc J. M. Bonten Utrecht University
Tjakko Abee
Tjakko Abee Wageningen University & Research
Teresa M. Coque
Teresa M. Coque Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria
Janetta Top
Janetta Top Utrecht University
Willem M. de Vos
Willem M. de Vos Wageningen University & Research
Michael S. Gilmore
Michael S. Gilmore Harvard Medical School
Fernando Baquero
Fernando Baquero Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria
Jukka Corander
Jukka Corander University of Oslo
Antoine Andremont
Antoine Andremont Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Willem van Schaik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles