World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
14761
World Ranking
16963
National Ranking
1

Duong Socheat publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Duong Socheat sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 97 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Duong Socheat D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Duong Socheat sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Duong Socheat is affiliated with the Ministry of Health in Cambodia and has contributed to research primarily within the fields of medicine and immunology and microbiology. Their scholarly work spans subfields including epidemiology, public health, environmental and occupational health, microbiology, and parasitology.

Their main research topics focus on malaria research and control, hepatitis B virus studies, herpesvirus infections and treatments, microbial infections and disease research, as well as vector-borne infectious diseases.

Duong Socheat has published multiple papers through UNC Libraries. Notable recent publications include:

  • Molecular Surveillance for Multidrug-Resistant Plasmodium falciparum, Cambodia (2020), UNC Libraries
  • Differing Patterns of Selection and Geospatial Genetic Diversity within Two Leading Plasmodium vivax Candidate Vaccine Antigens (2020), UNC Libraries
  • Plasmodium falciparum Gametocyte Carriage Is Associated with Subsequent Plasmodium vivax Relapse after Treatment (2020), UNC Libraries

Collaboration is a component of Duong Socheat's research, with frequent co-authors including Naman K. Shah, Alisa P. Alker, Rithy Sem, Agustina Ika Susanti, and Sinuon Muth.

Best Publications

  • Artemisinin Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria

    Arjen M. Dondorp;François Nosten;Poravuth Yi;Debashish Das

  • Evidence of Artemisinin-Resistant Malaria in Western Cambodia

    Harald Noedl;Youry Se;Kurt Schaecher;Bryan L Smith

  • Artemisinin resistance: current status and scenarios for containment

    Arjen M. Dondorp;Arjen M. Dondorp;Shunmay Yeung;Shunmay Yeung;Lisa White;Lisa White;Chea Nguon

  • Analysis of Plasmodium falciparum diversity in natural infections by deep sequencing

    Magnus Manske;Magnus Manske;Olivo Miotto;Olivo Miotto;Susana Campino;Susana Campino;Sarah Auburn;Sarah Auburn;Sarah Auburn

  • Artemisinin-resistant malaria in Asia.

    Harald Noedl;Duong Socheat;Wichai Satimai

  • Genetic loci associated with delayed clearance of Plasmodium falciparum following artemisinin treatment in Southeast Asia

    Shannon Takala-Harrison;Taane G Clark;Christopher G Jacob;Michael P Cummings

  • Erratum: Artemisinin resistance: current status and scenarios for containment

    A M Dondorp;S Yeung;L White;C Nguon

  • Failure of artesunate-mefloquine combination therapy for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in southern Cambodia.

    William O Rogers;Rithy Sem;Thong Tero;Pheaktra Chim

  • Plasmodium falciparum genome-wide scans for positive selection, recombination hot spots and resistance to antimalarial drugs

    Jianbing Mu;Rachel A. Myers;Rachel A. Myers;Hongying Jiang;Shengfa Liu;Shengfa Liu

  • Artemisinin Resistance in Cambodia: A Clinical Trial Designed to Address an Emerging Problem in Southeast Asia

    Harald Noedl;Youry Se;Sabaithip Sriwichai;Kurt Schaecher

  • Efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in northwest Cambodia.

    Mey Bouth Denis;Reiko Tsuyuoka;Pharath Lim;Niklas Lindegardh;Niklas Lindegardh

  • High Heritability of Malaria Parasite Clearance Rate Indicates a Genetic Basis for Artemisinin Resistance in Western Cambodia

    Tim J. C. Anderson;Shalini Nair;Standwell Nkhoma;Jeff T. Williams

  • Surveillance of the efficacy of artesunate and mefloquine combination for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Cambodia.

    Mey Bouth Denis;Reiko Tsuyuoka;Yi Poravuth;Top Sophoan Narann

  • Intrahost modeling of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum

    Sompob Saralamba;Wirichada Pan-Ngum;Richard J. Maude;Sue J. Lee

  • Sub-microscopic malaria cases and mixed malaria infection in a remote area of high malaria endemicity in Rattanakiri province, Cambodia: implication for malaria elimination

    Nicolas Steenkeste;William O Rogers;Lucy Okell;Isabelle Jeanne

  • Counterfeit and substandard antimalarial drugs in Cambodia.

    C.T. Lon;R. Tsuyuoka;S. Phanouvong;N. Nivanna

  • Exploring the Contribution of Candidate Genes to Artemisinin Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum

    Mallika Imwong;Arjen M. Dondorp;Arjen M. Dondorp;Francois Nosten;Francois Nosten;Poravuth Yi

  • Mitochondrial pseudogenes in the nuclear genome of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes: implications for past and future population genetic studies

    Thaung Hlaing;Willoughby Tun-Lin;Pradya Somboon;Duong Socheat

  • Rapid and effective malaria control in Cambodia through mass administration of artemisinin-piperaquine

    Jianping Song;Duong Socheat;Bo Tan;Prak Dara

  • Cost-effectiveness of annual targeted larviciding campaigns in Cambodia against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti.

    Jose A. Suaya;Donald S. Shepard;Moh-Seng Chang;Mariana Caram

Frequent Co-Authors

Arjen M. Dondorp
Arjen M. Dondorp Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
Nicholas J. White
Nicholas J. White Mahidol University
François Nosten
François Nosten MORU Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
Nicholas P. J. Day
Nicholas P. J. Day University of Oxford
Mallika Imwong
Mallika Imwong Mahidol University
Jong-Yil Chai
Jong-Yil Chai Seoul National University
Tai-Soon Yong
Tai-Soon Yong Yonsei University
Keeseon S. Eom
Keeseon S. Eom Chungbuk National University
Kesinee Chotivanich
Kesinee Chotivanich Mahidol University
Dominic P. Kwiatkowski
Dominic P. Kwiatkowski University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, especially in the healthcare and life sciences sectors. An increasingly popular route combines science backgrounds with technology-driven roles, such as medical coding and health information management.

Earning a credential like certified coding specialist (ccs) can be a strong next step. This certification is valued by employers, distinguishes you from other candidates, and can impact your earning potential. Curious about compensation? Explore what is medical coding salary to understand pay ranges and factors influencing income for medical coding professionals.

Before diving into this field, it’s wise to weigh the is medical coding a good job discussion, which covers job satisfaction, work-life balance, and potential challenges. If you’re considering an online degree, many reputable health information management schools online make it convenient to earn a recognized qualification from anywhere in the world.

Combining a science background with coding or health information skills can lead to stable, well-paying, and impactful healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Duong Socheat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles