World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
6355
World Ranking
7725
National Ranking
68

Bernhard Wett publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Wett sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 190 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Bernhard Wett D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Wett sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernhard Wett is a researcher affiliated with the University of Innsbruck in Austria. Their work primarily focuses on environmental science, with a considerable emphasis on pollution, water science and technology, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

Wett's research encompasses key areas related to wastewater treatment and nitrogen removal. Their expertise extends into membrane separation technologies and constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Additional topics include ammonia synthesis and nitrogen reduction, water treatment and disinfection, carbon dioxide capture technologies, and medical imaging and pathology studies.

The scientist has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • Operational and structural A-stage improvements for high-rate carbon removal (2020, Water Environment Research)
  • Primary sludge fermentate as carbon source for mainstream partial denitrification-anammox (PdNA) (2020, Water Environment Research)
  • Biological and physical selectors for mobile biofilms, aerobic granules, and densified-biological flocs in continuously flowing wastewater treatment processes: A state-of-the-art review (2023, Water Research)
  • Microbial response on the first full-scale DEMON® biomass transfer for mainstream deammonification (2022, Water Research)
  • Biological process architecture in continuous-flow activated sludge by gravimetry: Controlling densified biomass form and function in a hybrid granule-floc process at Dijon WRRF, France (2021, Water Environment Research)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Wett include Sudhir Murthy, Charles Bott, Haydée De Clippeleir, Ahmed Al-Omari, and Peter Aichinger.

Wett has published extensively in venues such as Water Environment Research and Water Research, with additional contributions in Chemosphere, the Journal of Water Process Engineering, and the SSRN Electronic Journal.

Their publishing record also includes book chapters with the Water Environment Federation, featuring titles like Full-Scale Demonstration of Continuous AvN Control: What Did We Learn for BNR Optimization? (2020) and Carbon & Energy Management in High-Rate Contact-Stabilization through Dynamic Oxygen Uptake Rate Control (2020).

Best Publications

  • Control of aeration, aerobic SRT and COD input for mainstream nitritation/denitritation.

    Pusker Regmi;Mark W. Miller;Becky Holgate;Ryder Bunce

  • Development and implementation of a robust deammonification process.

    B. Wett

  • The role of inorganic carbon limitation in biological nitrogen removal of extremely ammonia concentrated wastewater.

    Bernhard Wett;Wolfgang Rauch

  • High-rate activated sludge system for carbon management – Evaluation of crucial process mechanisms and design parameters

    Jose Jimenez;Mark Miller;Charles Bott;Sudhir Murthy

  • Going for mainstream deammonification from bench to full scale for maximized resource efficiency.

    B. Wett;A. Omari;S. M. Podmirseg;M. Han

  • Solved upscaling problems for implementing deammonification of rejection water.

    B. Wett

  • Environmental sustainability of an energy self-sufficient sewage treatment plant: improvements through DEMON and co-digestion.

    Thomas Schaubroeck;Haydée De Clippeleir;Haydée De Clippeleir;Norbert Weissenbacher;Jo Dewulf

  • Modelling nitrite in wastewater treatment systems: a discussion of different modelling concepts.

    Gürkan Sin;David Kaelin;Marlies J. Kampschreur;Imre Takács

  • Bioflocculation management through high-rate contact-stabilization: A promising technology to recover organic carbon from low-strength wastewater

    Arifur Rahman;Francis A. Meerburg;Shravani Ravadagundhi;Bernhard Wett

  • Expanding DEMON Sidestream Deammonification Technology Towards Mainstream Application.

    B Wett;S M Podmirseg;M Gómez-Brandón;M Hell

  • Synergistic co-digestion of solid-organic-waste and municipal-sewage-sludge: 1 plus 1 equals more than 2 in terms of biogas production and solids reduction

    Peter Aichinger;Tanush Wadhawan;Martin Kuprian;Matthew Higgins

  • Uncoupling the solids retention times of flocs and granules in mainstream deammonification: A screen as effective out-selection tool for nitrite oxidizing bacteria

    Mofei Han;Siegfried Vlaeminck;Siegfried Vlaeminck;A Al-Omari;B Wett

  • Identification of anammox bacteria in a full-scale deammonification plant making use of anaerobic ammonia oxidation

    Gerd Innerebner;Heribert Insam;Ingrid H. Franke-Whittle;Bernhard Wett

  • Syntrophy of aerobic and anaerobic ammonia oxidisers.

    B. Wett;M. Hell;G. Nyhuis;T. Puempel

  • Impact of carbon source and COD/N on the concurrent operation of partial denitrification and anammox.

    Tri Le;Tri Le;Bo Peng;Bo Peng;Chunyang Su;Arash Massoudieh

  • Adaptation of Methanogenic Communities to the Cofermentation of Cattle Excreta and Olive Mill Wastes at 37°C and 55°C

    Marta Goberna;Marta Goberna;Maria Gadermaier;Carlos García;Bernhard Wett

  • Population dynamics at digester overload conditions

    Michael A. Schoen;Daniel Sperl;Maria Gadermaier;Marta Goberna

  • Mesophilic and thermophilic co-fermentation of cattle excreta and olive mill wastes in pilot anaerobic digesters.

    M. Goberna;M.A. Schoen;D. Sperl;B. Wett

  • Systematic comparison of mechanical and thermal sludge disintegration technologies.

    B. Wett;P. Phothilangka;A. Eladawy

  • Impact of carbon to nitrogen ratio and aeration regime on mainstream deammonification

    M. Han;H. De Clippeleir;A. Al-Omari;B. Wett

Frequent Co-Authors

Sudhir Murthy
Sudhir Murthy Columbia University
Siegfried E. Vlaeminck
Siegfried E. Vlaeminck University of Antwerp
Mark W. Miller
Mark W. Miller Boston University
Kartik Chandran
Kartik Chandran Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Heribert Insam
Heribert Insam University of Innsbruck
Marta Goberna
Marta Goberna Spanish National Research Council
Pascal Boeckx
Pascal Boeckx Ghent University
Ingmar Nopens
Ingmar Nopens Ghent University
Jo Dewulf
Jo Dewulf Ghent University
Wolfgang Rauch
Wolfgang Rauch University of Innsbruck

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens a variety of career pathways, many of which can be enhanced through complementary online degrees. For educators looking to specialize, exploring online eds to edd programs offers advanced leadership and research skills essential for academic and administrative roles.

For those interested in the social dimensions of environmental issues, pursuing a dsw programs online can provide valuable expertise in social work, helping to address community challenges related to sustainability and resource management.

If you're seeking a broad foundation, some students consider cheapest online general studies degree programs, which offer flexibility and interdisciplinary perspectives beneficial for various environmental careers.

Additionally, those starting their academic journey might explore some of the easiest bachelors degree options available online, gaining practical knowledge quickly while balancing other commitments. Combining these educational routes can better prepare students for the evolving demands of the environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Bernhard Wett

Trending Scientists