World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
6807
World Ranking
10628
National Ranking
186

Denis Gillet publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denis Gillet sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 358 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Denis Gillet D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denis Gillet sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Denis Gillet is affiliated with the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple fields, with a strong focus on computer science, social sciences, and engineering. The primary areas of study include applications of computer science, astronomy and astrophysics, information systems, education, and artificial intelligence.

Their work covers a range of key topics such as online learning and analytics, stellar, planetary, and galactic studies, astro and planetary science, experimental learning in engineering, innovative teaching and learning methods, AI in service interactions, and software engineering research.

Denis Gillet has contributed to various publications and research articles, some of the recent papers include:

  • Understanding teacher design practices for digital inquiry-based science learning: the case of Go-Lab (2021), published in Educational Technology Research and Development
  • Social practices in teacher knowledge creation and innovation adoption: a large-scale study in an online instructional design community for inquiry learning (2020), published in International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
  • Gamifying knowledge sharing in humanitarian organisations: a design science journey (2020), published in European Journal of Information Systems
  • Instruction, Student Engagement, and Learning Outcomes: A Case Study Using Anonymous Social Media in a Face-to-Face Classroom (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
  • Promoting Computational Thinking Skills in Non-Computer-Science Students: Gamifying Computational Notebooks to Increase Student Engagement (2022), published in IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies

Frequent publication venues where Denis Gillet has presented their research include:

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
  • 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)
  • Douleur et Analgésie
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

The scientist has collaborated extensively with various co-authors. Notable frequent collaborators are:

  • Juan Carlos Farah
  • María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana
  • Sandy Ingram
  • Adrian Holzer
  • Basile Spaenlehauer

Best Publications

  • Perceiving Learning at a Glance: A Systematic Literature Review of Learning Dashboard Research

    Beat A. Schwendimann;Maria Jesus Rodriguez-Triana;Andrii Vozniuk;Luis P. Prieto

  • Innovations in STEM education: the Go-Lab federation of online labs

    Ton de Jong;Sofoklis A. Sotiriou;Denis Gillet

  • Collaborative web-based experimentation in flexible engineering education

    D. Gillet;Anh Vu Nguyen Ngoc;Y. Rekik

  • Information technology enhanced learning in distance and conventional education

    H.A. Latchman;Ch. Salzmann;D. Gillet;H. Bouzekri

  • The DESI Experiment Part II: Instrument Design

    Amir Aghamousa;Francisco Prada;Ginevra Favole;Klaus Honscheid

  • Hands-On Laboratory Experiments in Flexible and Distance Learning

    D. Gillet;H.A. Latchman;Ch. Salzmann;O.D. Crisalle

  • Monitoring, Awareness and Reflection in Blended Technology Enhanced Learning: a Systematic Review

    María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana;Luis P. Prieto;Andrii Vozniuk;Mina Shirvani Boroujeni

  • A recommender system for job seeking and recruiting website

    Yao Lu;Sandy El Helou;Denis Gillet

  • The Cockpit: An Effective Metaphor for Web-based Experimentation in Engineering Education*

    D. Gillet;F. Geoffroy;K. Zeramdini;A. V. Nguyen Ngoc

  • Model predictive coordination of autonomous vehicles crossing intersections

    Laleh Makarem;Denis Gillet

  • Turning Web 2.0 Social Software into Versatile Collaborative Learning Solutions

    D. Gillet;S. El Helou;Chiu Man Yu;C. Salzmann

  • A social media platform in higher education

    Evgeny Bogdanov;Freddy Limpens;Na Li;Sandy El Helou

  • Personalised learning spaces and federated online labs for STEM Education at School

    D. Gillet;T. de Jong;S. Sotirou;C. Salzmann

  • Towards an Online Lab Portal for Inquiry-Based STEM Learning at School

    Sten Govaerts;Yiwei Cao;Andrii Vozniuk;Adrian Holzer

  • The Smart Device specification for remote labs

    Christophe Salzmann;Sten Govaerts;Wissam Halimi;Denis Gillet

  • Fluent coordination of autonomous vehicles at intersections

    Laleh Makarem;Denis Gillet

  • Laboratory as a Service (LaaS): a Novel Paradigm for Developing and Implementing Modular Remote Laboratories

    Mohamed Tawfik;Christophe Salzmann;Denis Gillet;David Lowe

  • Understanding teacher design practices for digital inquiry–based science learning: the case of Go-Lab

    Ton de Jong;Denis Gillet;María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana;Tasos Hovardas

  • Reciprocal collision avoidance for quadrotors using on-board visual detection

    Steven Roelofsen;Denis Gillet;Alcherio Martinoli

  • Personal learning environments in a global higher engineering education Web 2.0 realm

    Denis Gillet;Effie L-C. Law;Arunangsu Chatterjee

  • Advanced control strategy of a solar domestic hot water system with a segmented auxiliary heater

    T. Prud’homme;D. Gillet

  • Understanding learning at a glance: an overview of learning dashboard studies

    Beat A. Schwendimann;María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana;Andrii Vozniuk;Luis P. Prieto

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Paul Kneib
Jean-Paul Kneib École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Hannes Bleuler
Hannes Bleuler École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Dominique Bonvin
Dominique Bonvin École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Ton de Jong
Ton de Jong University of Twente
Sebastián Dormido
Sebastián Dormido National University of Distance Education
Ralf Launhardt
Ralf Launhardt Max Planck Society
Francesco Pepe
Francesco Pepe University of Geneva
Alcherio Martinoli
Alcherio Martinoli École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Richard W. Pogge
Richard W. Pogge The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring your education in Computer Science offers various online pathways tailored to your goals and circumstances. For those seeking a flexible, foundational start, online associates degrees are a popular choice. They are ideal for building essential skills and can serve as a stepping stone to a bachelor’s program.

Cost is often a major concern. Fortunately, many students can lower expenses by enrolling in one of the cheapest online colleges. Affordable options make higher education more accessible, regardless of budget constraints.

Admission requirements also matter. If your academic record isn’t perfect, consider applying to online schools that accept low gpa. These institutions provide inclusive opportunities, allowing you to pursue your ambitions without being held back by past grades.

Beyond Computer Science, interdisciplinary careers are possible. For example, with a strong technical background, you may be interested in learning what can you do with an environmental science major. This opens doors to diverse roles where computing and environmental expertise intersect.

Best Scientists Citing Denis Gillet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles