World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
10785
World Ranking
8215
National Ranking
402

Hendrik Drachsler publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hendrik Drachsler sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 255 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hendrik Drachsler D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hendrik Drachsler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hendrik Drachsler is affiliated with the German Institute for International Educational Research in Germany. Their research spans multiple main fields of study, including Computer Science, Social Sciences, and Psychology, with notable contributions particularly in Computer Science applications and Education.

Their scholarly work covers diverse subfields such as Computer Science Applications, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Sociology and Political Science. These areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach to educational research with a strong foundation in technology-enhanced learning.

Key research topics addressed by Hendrik Drachsler include Online Learning and Analytics, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, E-Learning and Knowledge Management, Online and Blended Learning, Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning, Student Assessment and Feedback, and Advanced Text Analysis Techniques.

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on the intersection of learning technologies and educational analytics. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Are We There Yet? - A Systematic Literature Review on Chatbots in Education" (2021) published in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
  • "Learning analytics in European higher education-Trends and barriers" (2020) published in Computers & Education
  • "From students with love: An empirical study on learner goals, self-regulated learning and sense-making of learning analytics in higher education" (2020) published in The Internet and Higher Education
  • "Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback?" (2024) published in International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
  • "Literature Review on Co-Located Collaboration Modeling Using Multimodal Learning Analytics-Can We Go the Whole Nine Yards?" (2021) published in IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies

Their collaborative network includes frequent coauthors such as Daniele Di Mitri, Maren Scheffel, Ioana Jivet, Joshua Weidlich, and Ján Schneider, indicating sustained partnerships in their research endeavors.

Hendrik Drachsler's work has been published extensively in several venues, with notable recurring publications in:

  • Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
  • Journal of Learning Analytics
  • The Internet and Higher Education
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

In addition to journal articles, the scientist has contributed to book publications, including a book titled "Learning Analytics Cookbook" published by Springer International Publishing in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Translating Learning into Numbers: A Generic Framework for Learning Analytics

    Wolfgang Greller;Hendrik Drachsler

  • Context-Aware Recommender Systems for Learning: A Survey and Future Challenges

    K. Verbert;N. Manouselis;X. Ochoa;M. Wolpers

  • Recommender Systems in Technology Enhanced Learning

    Nikos Manouselis;Hendrik Drachsler;Riina Vuorikari;Hans G. K. Hummel

  • Privacy and analytics: it's a DELICATE issue a checklist for trusted learning analytics

    Hendrik Drachsler;Wolfgang Greller

  • Are We There Yet? - A Systematic Literature Review on Chatbots in Education

    Sebastian Wollny;Jan Schneider;Daniele Di Mitri;Joshua Weidlich

  • Knowledge Worker Roles and Actions— Results of Two Empirical Studies

    Wolfgang Reinhardt;Benedikt Schmidt;Peter Sloep;Hendrik Drachsler

  • Personal recommender systems for learners in lifelong learning networks: the requirements, techniques and model

    Hendrik Drachsler;Hans G. K. Hummel;Rob Koper

  • Panorama of Recommender Systems to Support Learning

    Hendrik Drachsler;Katrien Verbert;Katrien Verbert;Olga C. Santos;Nikos Manouselis

  • License to evaluate: preparing learning analytics dashboards for educational practice

    Ioana Jivet;Maren Scheffel;Marcus Specht;Hendrik Drachsler

  • Time will tell

    Bernardo Tabuenca;Marco Kalz;Hendrik Drachsler;Marcus Specht

  • Recommender Systems for Learning

    Nikos Manouselis;Hendrik Drachsler;Katrien Verbert;Erik Duval

  • Dataset-Driven Research to Support Learning and Knowledge Analytics

    Katrien Verbert;Nikos Manouselis;Hendrik Drachsler;Erik Duval

  • Quality Indicators for Learning Analytics.

    Maren Scheffel;Hendrik Drachsler;Slavi Stoyanov;Marcus Specht

  • Dataset-driven research for improving recommender systems for learning

    Katrien Verbert;Hendrik Drachsler;Nikos Manouselis;Martin Wolpers

  • From signals to knowledge: A conceptual model for multimodal learning analytics

    Daniele Di Mitri;Jan Schneider;Marcus Specht;Hendrik Drachsler

  • Awareness Is Not Enough: Pitfalls of Learning Analytics Dashboards in the Educational Practice

    Ioana Jivet;Maren Scheffel;Hendrik Drachsler;Hendrik Drachsler;Marcus Specht

  • The pulse of learning analytics understandings and expectations from the stakeholders

    Hendrik Drachsler;Wolfgang Greller

  • Learning analytics in European higher education: Trends and barriers

    Yi-Shan Tsai;Diego Rates;Pedro Manuel Moreno-Marcos;Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino

  • Identifying the Goal, User model and Conditions of Recommender Systems for Formal and Informal Learning

    Hendrik Drachsler;Hans G. K. Hummel;Rob Koper

  • The MOOC and learning analytics innovation cycle MOLAC: a reflective summary of ongoing research and its challenges

    H. Drachsler;M. Kalz

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcus Specht
Marcus Specht Delft University of Technology
Peter Sloep
Peter Sloep The Open University
Rob Koper
Rob Koper Open University in the Netherlands
Dragan Gasevic
Dragan Gasevic Monash University
Mathieu d'Aquin
Mathieu d'Aquin University of Lorraine
Jan vom Brocke
Jan vom Brocke University of Münster
José Janssen
José Janssen Open University in the Netherlands
Erik Duval
Erik Duval KU Leuven
Paul A. Kirschner
Paul A. Kirschner Open University in the Netherlands

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a variety of valuable online degree options and career paths. For those seeking quick entry into the tech workforce, short certificate programs that pay well offer practical skills in high-demand areas—with some programs completed in just months.

If you’re interested in advancing your career further, consider the quickest cheapest masters degree options available online. These programs are designed for speed and affordability, allowing you to improve your credentials without years of study or significant debt.

As you plan your education, it’s also important to focus on fields that offer the strongest return on investment. The most valuable masters degrees in tech and related sectors can unlock higher salaries and advanced roles.

Those starting from scratch or looking for a flexible, cost-effective approach might find associate degree online programs an ideal entry point. These 2-year degrees provide a solid foundation and pave the way for bachelor’s study or immediate employment in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Hendrik Drachsler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles