D-Index & Metrics Best Publications
Social Sciences and Humanities
Netherlands
2023

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 58 Citations 16,540 274 World Ranking 987 National Ranking 34

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

2023 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Mathematics education
  • Educational technology

Ton de Jong mainly investigates Computer-Assisted Instruction, Mathematics education, Discovery learning, Educational technology and Learning environment. The Mathematics education study combines topics in areas such as Motion and Popularity. Ton de Jong works mostly in the field of Discovery learning, limiting it down to concerns involving Artificial intelligence and, occasionally, Machine learning, Learning theory and Educational psychology.

His Educational technology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Collaborative learning and Multimedia. His Learning environment research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Domain and Human–computer interaction. He combines subjects such as Instructional simulation, Instructional design and Algorithmic learning theory with his study of Human–computer interaction.

His most cited work include:

  • Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains (1117 citations)
  • Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought (495 citations)
  • Types and qualities of knowledge (461 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Mathematics education, Human–computer interaction, Learning environment, Educational technology and Artificial intelligence. His research integrates issues of Pedagogy and Knowledge management in his study of Mathematics education. The study incorporates disciplines such as Instructional simulation, Discovery learning and Instructional design in addition to Human–computer interaction.

The various areas that Ton de Jong examines in his Educational technology study include Experiential learning, Collaborative learning, Multimedia and Synchronous learning. The study incorporates disciplines such as Domain, Machine learning and Natural language processing in addition to Artificial intelligence. His research in Domain intersects with topics in Representation and Domain knowledge.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Mathematics education (32.13%)
  • Human–computer interaction (16.97%)
  • Learning environment (16.25%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Mathematics education (32.13%)
  • Educational technology (16.25%)
  • Learning environment (16.25%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Ton de Jong spends much of his time researching Mathematics education, Educational technology, Learning environment, Teaching method and Proportional reasoning. His studies deal with areas such as Control and Multimedia as well as Mathematics education. His work is dedicated to discovering how Educational technology, Science education are connected with System dynamics, Concept map, Artificial intelligence, Software deployment and Engineering management and other disciplines.

His work investigates the relationship between Learning environment and topics such as Active learning that intersect with problems in Sequence learning, Cognitive psychology, Experiential learning, Early adolescents and Attitude change. His work carried out in the field of Proportional reasoning brings together such families of science as Vocational education and Cognition. His research in Collaborative learning focuses on subjects like Cooperative learning, which are connected to Computer-Assisted Instruction, Computer-mediated communication, Social influence and Formative assessment.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle (329 citations)
  • Identifying Potential Types of Guidance for Supporting Student Inquiry When Using Virtual and Remote Labs in Science: A Literature Review (64 citations)
  • How competition and heterogeneous collaboration interact in prevocational game-based mathematics education (40 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Mathematics education
  • Educational technology

His primary areas of study are Mathematics education, Teaching method, Proportional reasoning, Control and Educational technology. His Mathematics education study incorporates themes from Field, Work and Knowledge acquisition. His Teaching method research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Argument, Instructional design and Digital storytelling.

His research investigates the connection between Proportional reasoning and topics such as Cognition that intersect with problems in Expectancy theory, Surprise, Logical reasoning and Experiential learning. The Educational technology study combines topics in areas such as Affordance, Science education and Skill development. He has researched Collaborative learning in several fields, including Cooperative learning, Peer assessment, Computer-mediated communication and Computer-Assisted Instruction.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains

Ton de Jong;Wouter R. van Joolingen.
Review of Educational Research (1998)

2218 Citations

Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought

Ton de Jong.
Instructional Science (2010)

1067 Citations

Types and qualities of knowledge

Ton de Jong;Monica G.M. Ferguson-Hessler.
Educational Psychologist (1996)

1016 Citations

Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle

Margus Pedaste;Mario Mäeots;Leo A. Siiman;Ton de Jong.
Educational Research Review (2015)

1006 Citations

Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education

Ton de Jong;Marcia C. Linn;Zacharias C. Zacharia.
Science (2013)

713 Citations

Computer simulations. Technological advances in inquiry learning.

Ton de Jong.
Science (2006)

526 Citations

Co-Lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning

Wouter R. van Joolingen;Ton de Jong;Ard W. Lazonder;Elwin R. Savelsbergh.
Computers in Human Behavior (2005)

411 Citations

Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: learning processes and instructional support

Melanie Njoo;Ton de Jong.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching (1993)

320 Citations

Supporting students' learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment

Jan van der Meij;Ton de Jong.
Learning and Instruction (2006)

319 Citations

Cognitive structures of good and poor novice problem solvers in physics

Ton de Jong;Monica G.M. Ferguson-Hessler.
Journal of Educational Psychology (1986)

294 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Ton de Jong

Frank Fischer

Frank Fischer

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Publications: 37

Paul A. Kirschner

Paul A. Kirschner

Open University in the Netherlands

Publications: 28

Denis Gillet

Denis Gillet

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

Publications: 23

Heinz Mandl

Heinz Mandl

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Publications: 22

Vincent Aleven

Vincent Aleven

Carnegie Mellon University

Publications: 21

Eileen Scanlon

Eileen Scanlon

The Open University

Publications: 20

Alexander Renkl

Alexander Renkl

University of Freiburg

Publications: 19

Gwo-Jen Hwang

Gwo-Jen Hwang

National Taiwan University of Science and Technology

Publications: 19

Katharina Scheiter

Katharina Scheiter

University of Potsdam

Publications: 17

Jan L. Plass

Jan L. Plass

New York University

Publications: 16

Marcel V. J. Veenman

Marcel V. J. Veenman

Leiden University

Publications: 16

Demetrios G. Sampson

Demetrios G. Sampson

University of Piraeus

Publications: 15

Yannis Dimitriadis

Yannis Dimitriadis

University of Valladolid

Publications: 15

Marcia C. Linn

Marcia C. Linn

University of California, Berkeley

Publications: 15

Mike Sharples

Mike Sharples

The Open University

Publications: 15

Gautam Biswas

Gautam Biswas

University of Pennsylvania

Publications: 15

Trending Scientists

Steven M. Bellovin

Steven M. Bellovin

Columbia University

Hani Hagras

Hani Hagras

University of Essex

Carl Vondrick

Carl Vondrick

Columbia University

Chin-Laung Lei

Chin-Laung Lei

National Taiwan University

Michael I. Verkhovsky

Michael I. Verkhovsky

University of Helsinki

Grzegorz Bartosz

Grzegorz Bartosz

InterAmerican University of Puerto Rico

Stephen Hill

Stephen Hill

Florida State University

Koichi Takeya

Koichi Takeya

University of Tokyo

Seimei Shiratori

Seimei Shiratori

Keio University

Nektarios Tavernarakis

Nektarios Tavernarakis

Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas

Patrick J. Sinko

Patrick J. Sinko

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Thierry Fontaine

Thierry Fontaine

Institut Pasteur

Shigeo Mori

Shigeo Mori

University of Tokyo

Nicholas Dale

Nicholas Dale

University of Warwick

Annette Sterr

Annette Sterr

University of Surrey

Paula Brough

Paula Brough

Griffith University

Something went wrong. Please try again later.