World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 61 1323 1174 615 537 210 21019

K. Rivet Amico publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by K. Rivet Amico between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. K. Rivet Amico published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2018. 39 of the 283 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2018. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 20 publications
2002 2025

283 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
K. Rivet Amico: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 3
2005 2
2006 5
2007 1
2008 6
2009 5
2010 4
2011 9
2012 11
2013 18
2014 15
2015 8
2016 16
2017 16
2018 25
2019 24
2020 18
2021 21
2022 15
2023 20
2024 19
2025 20
Total 283
Download as CSV

K. Rivet Amico publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Rivet Amico sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 210 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 210
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

K. Rivet Amico D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Rivet Amico sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86 61
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

K. Rivet Amico is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with a significant emphasis on infectious diseases and epidemiology. Their scholarly work addresses several interconnected topics related to HIV/AIDS including prevention, drug use, sexual risk, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, and drug development and treatment within the context of HIV/AIDS.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Epidemiology
  • General Health Professions
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Emergency Medicine

Amico's research covers several central topics as well:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Sex work and related issues
  • HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • HIV Research and Treatment

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Friday Saidi
  • Twambilile Phanga
  • Wilbroad Mutale
  • Michael G. Hudgens
  • Keith J. Horvath

Amico publishes regularly in journals including:

  • AIDS and Behavior
  • UNC Libraries
  • JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • PLoS ONE

Recent academic papers authored or co-authored by K. Rivet Amico are:

  • Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate HIV antiretroviral therapy regimens started in pregnancy (IMPAACT 2010/VESTED): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial (2021), published in The Lancet
  • Integrating HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis With Community-Based Syringe Services for Women Who Inject Drugs: Results From the Project SHE Demonstration Study (2020), published in JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
  • Validation of the HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Stigma Scale: Performance of Likert and Semantic Differential Scale Versions (2020), published in AIDS and Behavior
  • Tenofovir Diphosphate Concentrations in Dried Blood Spots From Pregnant and Postpartum Adolescent and Young Women Receiving Daily Observed Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Sub-Saharan Africa (2020), published in Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Missed Prevention Opportunities: Why Young, Black MSM with Recent HIV Diagnosis did not Access HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Services (2020), published in AIDS and Behavior

Best Publications

  • Preexposure Chemoprophylaxis for HIV Prevention in Men Who Have Sex with Men

    Robert M. Grant;Javier R. Lama;Peter L. Anderson;Vanessa McMahan

  • Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual practices, and HIV incidence in men and transgender women who have sex with men: a cohort study

    Robert M. Grant;Robert M. Grant;Robert M. Grant;Peter L. Anderson;Vanessa McMahan;Albert Liu

  • An information-motivation-behavioral skills model of adherence to antiretroviral therapy

    Jeffrey D. Fisher;William A. Fisher;K. Rivet Amico;Jennifer J. Harman

  • HIV Stigma Mechanisms and Well-Being Among PLWH: A Test of the HIV Stigma Framework

    Valerie A. Earnshaw;Laramie R. Smith;Stephenie R. Chaudoir;Stephenie R. Chaudoir;K. Rivet Amico

  • Preexposure Prophylaxis for HIV Infection Integrated With Municipal- and Community-Based Sexual Health Services

    Albert Y. Liu;Stephanie E. Cohen;Eric Vittinghoff;Peter L. Anderson

  • Guidelines for improving entry into and retention in care and antiretroviral adherence for persons with HIV: evidence-based recommendations from an International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care panel.

    Melanie A. Thompson;Michael J. Mugavero;K. Rivet Amico;Victoria A. Cargill

  • Efficacy of Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence Interventions: A Research Synthesis of Trials, 1996 to 2004

    K. Rivet Amico;Jennifer J. Harman;Blair T. Johnson

  • Defining success with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: a prevention-effective adherence paradigm.

    Jessica E. Haberer;David R. Bangsberg;Jared M. Baeten;Kathryn Curran

  • No Evidence of sexual risk compensation in the iPrEx trial of daily oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis

    Julia L. Marcus;David V. Glidden;Kenneth H. Mayer;Albert Y. Liu

  • Early retention in HIV care and viral load suppression: implications for a test and treat approach to HIV prevention.

    Michael J. Mugavero;K. Rivet Amico;Andrew O. Westfall;Heidi M. Crane

  • A proposal for quality standards for measuring medication adherence in research.

    Ann Bartley Williams;K. Rivet Amico;Carol Bova;Julie A. Womack

  • Strategies for Promoting Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy: A Review of the Literature

    Jane M. Simoni;K. Rivet Amico;Cynthia R. Pearson;Robert Malow

  • Visual analog scale of ART adherence: association with 3-day self-report and adherence barriers.

    K Rivet Amico;William A Fisher;Deborah H Cornman;Paul A Shuper

  • Adherence to antiretroviral therapy: an empirical test of the information-motivation-behavioral skills model.

    Fabrizio Starace;Alessandra Massa;K. Rivet Amico;Jeffrey D. Fisher

  • The Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model of Antiretroviral Adherence and Its Applications

    Jeffrey D. Fisher;K. Rivet Amico;William A. Fisher;Jennifer J. Harman

  • Antiretroviral Adherence Interventions: Translating Research Findings to the Real World Clinic

    Jane M. Simoni;K. Rivet Amico;Laramie Smith;Kimberly Nelson

  • Improving antiretroviral therapy adherence in resource-limited settings at scale: a discussion of interventions and recommendations

    Jessica E. Haberer;Lora Sabin;K. Rivet Amico;Catherine Orrell

  • A situated-Information Motivation Behavioral Skills Model of Care Initiation and Maintenance (sIMB-CIM): An IMB Model Based Approach to Understanding and Intervening in Engagement in Care for Chronic Medical Conditions

    K. Rivet Amico

  • Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an online peer-to-peer social support ART adherence intervention.

    Keith J. Horvath;J. Michael Oakes;B. R. Simon Rosser;Gene Danilenko

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of a Mobile Health Intervention to Promote Retention and Adherence to Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Young People at Risk for Human Immunodeficiency Virus: The EPIC Study.

    Albert Y Liu;Eric Vittinghoff;Patricia von Felten;K Rivet Amico

  • Adherence Support Approaches in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials: Experiences, Insights and Future Directions from Four Multisite Prevention Trials

    K. Rivet Amico;Leila E. Mansoor;Amy Corneli;Kristine Torjesen

  • The Information–Motivation–Behavioral Skills Model of ART Adherence in a Deep South HIV+ Clinic Sample

    K. Rivet Amico;William Barta;Deborah J. Konkle-Parker;Jeffrey D. Fisher

  • Clinician-initiated HIV risk reduction intervention for HIV-positive persons: Formative Research, Acceptability, and Fidelity of the Options Project.

    Jeffrey D Fisher;Deborah H Cornman;Chandra Y Osborn;K Rivet Amico

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert M. Grant
Robert M. Grant University of California, San Francisco
Jeffrey D. Fisher
Jeffrey D. Fisher University of Connecticut
Kenneth H. Mayer
Kenneth H. Mayer Harvard Medical School
Peter L. Anderson
Peter L. Anderson University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Sten H. Vermund
Sten H. Vermund Yale University
James P. Hughes
James P. Hughes University of Washington
Jane M. Simoni
Jane M. Simoni University of Washington
William A. Fisher
William A. Fisher University of Western Ontario
Jeffrey A. Cully
Jeffrey A. Cully Baylor College of Medicine
Susan Buchbinder
Susan Buchbinder University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up versatile, rewarding pathways, especially with the growth of flexible online degree options. For those interested in social services, a masters in social work online is a popular choice, leading to impactful roles in community agencies, healthcare, and beyond.

If your passion lies in the study of human behavior, an accelerated psychology degree online enables you to fast-track your education, preparing for diverse roles or advanced study. For students seeking licensure as counselors, many choose cacrep-accredited programs to meet industry standards for clinical practice.

Interested in family dynamics and therapy? marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by leading organizations set you on a track for licensed practice, supporting couples and families in need.

These online degrees make education more accessible and support a variety of fulfilling careers in the helping professions.

Best Scientists Citing K. Rivet Amico

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles