World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10391 9753 5348 4939 607 37002

Jared M. Baeten publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jared M. Baeten between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jared M. Baeten published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 25.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 69 publications in 2021. 43 of the 670 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 69. Peak 69 publications in 2021. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 36 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 42 publications 2017: 45 publications 2018: 33 publications 2019: 61 publications 2020: 60 publications 2021: 69 publications 2022: 52 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 15 publications
2000 2025

670 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jared M. Baeten: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 4
2002 7
2003 2
2004 9
2005 4
2006 12
2007 8
2008 7
2009 15
2010 11
2011 24
2012 27
2013 36
2014 29
2015 26
2016 42
2017 45
2018 33
2019 61
2020 60
2021 69
2022 52
2023 42
2024 28
2025 15
Total 670
Download as CSV

Jared M. Baeten publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jared M. Baeten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 607 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 607
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jared M. Baeten D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jared M. Baeten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jared M. Baeten is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine with a specialization in infectious diseases, epidemiology, general health professions, virology, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's work covers several main topics including:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • HIV Research and Treatment
  • HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Reproductive tract infections research

Jared M. Baeten has contributed to notable recent papers such as:

  • Twice-Yearly Lenacapavir or Daily F/TAF for HIV Prevention in Cisgender Women (2024), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • Capsid Inhibition with Lenacapavir in Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 Infection (2022), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • Efficacy of Single-Dose Human Papillomavirus Vaccination among Young African Women (2022), published in NEJM Evidence
  • PrEP uptake, persistence, adherence, and effect of retrospective drug level feedback on PrEP adherence among young women in southern Africa: Results from HPTN 082, a randomized controlled trial (2021), published in PLoS Medicine
  • Community-based antiretroviral therapy versus standard clinic-based services for HIV in South Africa and Uganda (DO ART): a randomised trial (2020), published in The Lancet Global Health

Frequent co-authors involved in collaborative research with Jared M. Baeten include:

  • Connie Celum
  • Nelly Mugo
  • Elizabeth A. Bukusi
  • Thesla Palanee-Phillips
  • Renee Heffron

The scientist often publishes in journals such as:

  • Journal of the International AIDS Society
  • The Lancet HIV
  • JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
  • AIDS and Behavior
  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases

Best Publications

  • Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women.

    Jared M. Baeten;Deborah Donnell;Deborah Donnell;Patrick Ndase;Nelly R. Mugo;Nelly R. Mugo

  • Heterosexual HIV-1 transmission after initiation of antiretroviral therapy: a prospective cohort analysis.

    Deborah Donnell;Deborah Donnell;Jared M. Baeten;James Njogu Kiarie;James Njogu Kiarie;Katherine K. Thomas

  • Pregnancy complications and outcomes among overweight and obese nulliparous women.

    Jared M. Baeten;Elizabeth A. Bukusi;Mats Lambe

  • Infection with Trichomonas vaginalis Increases the Risk of HIV-1 Acquisition

    R. Scott McClelland;Laura Sangaré;Wisal M. Hassan;Ludo Lavreys;Ludo Lavreys

  • Acyclovir and transmission of HIV-1 from persons infected with HIV-1 and HSV-2.

    C. Celum;A. Wald;A. Wald;J.R. Lingappa;A.S. Magaret;A.S. Magaret

  • Use of a Vaginal Ring Containing Dapivirine for HIV-1 Prevention in Women

    Jared M. Baeten;Thesla Palanee-Phillips;Elizabeth R. Brown;Elizabeth R. Brown;Katie Schwartz

  • Use of hormonal contraceptives and risk of HIV-1 transmission: a prospective cohort study

    Renee Heffron;Deborah Donnell;Helen Rees;Connie Celum

  • Bacterial vaginosis associated with increased risk of female-to-male HIV-1 transmission: a prospective cohort analysis among African couples.

    Craig R. Cohen;Jairam R. Lingappa;Jared M. Baeten;Musa O. Ngayo

  • HIV Protective Efficacy and Correlates of Tenofovir Blood Concentrations in a Clinical Trial of PrEP for HIV Prevention

    Deborah Donnell;Jared M. Baeten;Namandjé N. Bumpus;Justin Brantley

  • Determinants of Per-Coital-Act HIV-1 Infectivity Among African HIV-1–Serodiscordant Couples

    James P. Hughes;Jared M. Baeten;Jairam R. Lingappa;Amalia S. Magaret

  • Combination HIV prevention: significance, challenges, and opportunities.

    Ann E. Kurth;Ann E. Kurth;Connie Celum;Jared M. Baeten;Sten H. Vermund

  • Genital HIV-1 RNA Predicts Risk of Heterosexual HIV-1 Transmission

    Jared M. Baeten;Erin Kahle;Jairam R. Lingappa;Robert W. Coombs

  • HIV-1 subtype D infection is associated with faster disease progression than subtype A in spite of similar plasma HIV-1 Loads

    Jared M Baeten;Bhavna Chohan;Ludo Lavreys;Ludo Lavreys;Vrasha Chohan

  • Hormonal contraception and risk of sexually transmitted disease acquisition: Results from a prospective study

    Jared M. Baeten;Patrick M. Nyange;Barbra A. Richardson;Ludo Lavreys

  • Intravaginal Practices, Bacterial Vaginosis, and HIV Infection in Women: Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

    Nicola Low;Matthew F. Chersich;Matthew F. Chersich;Kurt Schmidlin;Matthias Egger

  • Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of HIV Acquisition: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

    Charles S. Morrison;Pai Lien Chen;Cynthia Kwok;Jared M. Baeten

  • HIV incidence among women using intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, a copper intrauterine device, or a levonorgestrel implant for contraception: a randomised, multicentre, open-label trial

    Khatija Ahmed;Jared M Baeten;Mags Beksinska;Linda-Gail Bekker

  • Increased risk of HIV-1 transmission in pregnancy: a prospective study among African HIV-1-serodiscordant couples.

    Nelly R. Mugo;Renee Heffron;Deborah Donnell;Anna Wald

  • Defining success with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: a prevention-effective adherence paradigm.

    Jessica E. Haberer;David R. Bangsberg;Jared M. Baeten;Kathryn Curran

  • What's love got to do with it? Explaining adherence to oral antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-serodiscordant couples.

    Norma C. Ware;Monique A. Wyatt;Jessica E. Haberer;Jared M. Baeten

Frequent Co-Authors

Connie Celum
Connie Celum University of Washington
Elizabeth A. Bukusi
Elizabeth A. Bukusi University of Washington
Deborah Donnell
Deborah Donnell Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Ludo Lavreys
Ludo Lavreys Johnson & Johnson (Netherlands)
Barbra A. Richardson
Barbra A. Richardson University of Washington
Anna Wald
Anna Wald University of Washington
Grace John-Stewart
Grace John-Stewart University of Washington
Kishorchandra Mandaliya
Kishorchandra Mandaliya University of Washington
R. Scott McClelland
R. Scott McClelland University of Washington
Jessica E. Haberer
Jessica E. Haberer Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related degrees and professional opportunities, especially with the growth of reputable online programs. For those interested in preventive care and wellness, an online bachelor's degree in nutrition can be a valuable first step, paving the way for careers in health coaching or dietetics.

Leadership roles in healthcare are also in high demand. Programs like cahme-accredited online mha programs offer flexible pathways to healthcare administration, a crucial field for those interested in the business side of medicine.

For registered nurses aiming to advance, an rn to bsn online without clinicals offers a fast track to higher qualifications—without the need for additional in-person clinical hours.

Experienced nurses can further specialize by enrolling in one of the shortest dnp programs, earning a Doctor of Nursing Practice to assume advanced clinical or leadership roles. These diverse online options create flexible paths, making it easier to align your career goals with the evolving needs of the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Jared M. Baeten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles