World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 110 5511 5178 151 146 750 50126

Jeffrey Lipman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeffrey Lipman between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeffrey Lipman published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 17.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 60 publications in 2016. 40 of the 805 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 60. Peak 60 publications in 2016. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 18 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 8 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 34 publications 2010: 40 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 38 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 44 publications 2015: 52 publications 2016: 60 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 42 publications 2020: 45 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 16 publications
1981 2025

805 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeffrey Lipman: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 3
1983 0
1984 3
1985 1
1986 1
1987 4
1988 2
1989 1
1990 3
1991 7
1992 4
1993 9
1994 18
1995 6
1996 11
1997 11
1998 4
1999 13
2000 5
2001 7
2002 6
2003 1
2004 8
2005 12
2006 9
2007 19
2008 13
2009 34
2010 40
2011 35
2012 38
2013 31
2014 44
2015 52
2016 60
2017 33
2018 36
2019 42
2020 45
2021 41
2022 27
2023 25
2024 24
2025 16
Total 805
Download as CSV

Jeffrey Lipman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey Lipman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 741–760 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 750 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230 750
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeffrey Lipman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey Lipman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429 110
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeffrey Lipman is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia and has a primary research focus in the field of Medicine, with 328 publications. Their subfields of study include Pharmacology, Epidemiology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Molecular Medicine, and Surgery.

Their research topics cover several areas related to infection and antimicrobial therapy, including:

  • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Nosocomial Infections in ICU

Jeffrey Lipman's recent papers include the following:

  • "On-Site Therapeutic Drug Monitoring," 2020, published in Trends in Biotechnology
  • "Epidemiology and outcomes of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in intensive care unit patients: the EUROBACT-2 international cohort study," 2023, Intensive Care Medicine
  • "Initial antimicrobial management of sepsis," 2021, Critical Care
  • "Antimicrobial-associated harm in critical care: a narrative review," 2020, Intensive Care Medicine
  • "Pulmonary infections complicating ARDS," 2020, Intensive Care Medicine

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Jeffrey Lipman are:

  • Jason A. Roberts
  • Steven C. Wallis
  • Jan J. De Waele
  • Menino Osbert Cotta
  • Suzanne L. Parker

The most common publication venues where Jeffrey Lipman's research appears include:

  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
  • Antibiotics
  • International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
  • Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine

Best Publications

  • International Study of the Prevalence and Outcomes of Infection in Intensive Care Units

    Jean Louis Vincent;Jordi Rello;John Marshall;Eliezer Silva

  • Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care

    John A. Myburgh;Simon Finfer;Rinaldo Bellomo;Laurent Billot

  • Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: The Intensive Care Over Nations (ICON) audit

    Jean Louis Vincent;John C Marshall;Silvio Antonio Ñamendys-Silva;Bruno François

  • DALI: Defining Antibiotic Levels in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Are Current β-Lactam Antibiotic Doses Sufficient for Critically Ill Patients?

    Jason A. Roberts;Sanjoy K. Paul;Murat Akova;Matteo Bassetti

  • Individualised antibiotic dosing for patients who are critically ill: challenges and potential solutions

    Jason A Roberts;Jason A Roberts;Mohd H Abdul-Aziz;Jeffrey Lipman;Jeffrey Lipman;Johan W Mouton

  • Pharmacokinetic issues for antibiotics in the critically ill patient.

    Jason A. Roberts;Jeffrey Lipman

  • Adult-population incidence of severe sepsis in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units

    Simon Finfer;Rinaldo Bellomo;Jeffrey Lipman;Craig French

  • The effect of pathophysiology on pharmacokinetics in the critically ill patient — Concepts appraised by the example of antimicrobial agents☆

    Stijn I. Blot;Stijn I. Blot;Federico Pea;Jeffrey Lipman;Jeffrey Lipman

  • Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill

    Andrew A. Udy;Andrew A. Udy;Jason A. Roberts;Jason A. Roberts;Robert J. Boots;Robert J. Boots;David L. Paterson;David L. Paterson

  • The Effects of Hypoalbuminaemia on Optimizing Antibacterial Dosing in Critically Ill Patients

    Marta Ulldemolins;Jason A. Roberts;Jason A. Roberts;Jordi Rello;Jordi Rello;David L. Paterson;David L. Paterson

  • Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis and without renal dysfunction: intermittent bolus versus continuous administration? Monte Carlo dosing simulations and subcutaneous tissue distribution

    Jason A. Roberts;Carl M. J. Kirkpatrick;Michael S. Roberts;Thomas A. Robertson

  • Characteristics and determinants of outcome of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in intensive care units: the EUROBACT International Cohort Study

    Alexis Tabah;Despoina Koulenti;Kevin Laupland;Benoit Misset

  • Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics in severe sepsis: a multicenter double-blind, randomized controlled trial

    Joel M. Dulhunty;Jason A. Roberts;Joshua S. Davis;Steven A. R. Webb

  • Antibiotic resistance : What's dosing got to do with it?

    Jason A. Roberts;Peter Kruger;David L. Paterson;David L. Paterson;Jeffrey Lipman;Jeffrey Lipman

  • A comparison of epinephrine and norepinephrine in critically ill patients

    John A. Myburgh;Alisa Higgins;Alina Jovanovska;Jeffrey Lipman

  • Therapeutic drug monitoring of β-lactams in critically ill patients: proof of concept

    Jason A. Roberts;Jason A. Roberts;Marta Ulldemolins;Marta Ulldemolins;Michael S. Roberts;Michael S. Roberts;Brett McWhinney

  • Sepsis in intensive care unit patients: worldwide data from the intensive care over nations audit

    Yasser Sakr;Ulrich Jaschinski;Xavier Wittebole;Tamas Szakmany

  • Continuous versus intermittent β-lactam infusion in severe sepsis: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials

    Jason A. Roberts;Mohd Hafiz Abdul-Aziz;Joshua S. Davis;Joel M. Dulhunty

  • Antibacterial dosing in intensive care: pharmacokinetics, degree of disease and pharmacodynamics of sepsis.

    Jason A Roberts;Jeffrey Lipman;Jeffrey Lipman

  • Subtherapeutic initial β-lactam concentrations in select critically ill patients: association between augmented renal clearance and low trough drug concentrations.

    Andrew A. Udy;Julie M. Varghese;Mahdi Altukroni;Scott Briscoe

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason A. Roberts
Jason A. Roberts University of Queensland
David L. Paterson
David L. Paterson University of Queensland
Michael S. Roberts
Michael S. Roberts University of Queensland
Jordi Rello
Jordi Rello Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Rinaldo Bellomo
Rinaldo Bellomo Monash University
George Dimopoulos
George Dimopoulos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Stijn Blot
Stijn Blot Ghent University
Jean Louis Vincent
Jean Louis Vincent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Fabio Silvio Taccone
Fabio Silvio Taccone Université Libre de Bruxelles
Andrew Rhodes
Andrew Rhodes St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in medicine doesn’t have to begin and end with medical school. There are a variety of affordable and accessible online pathways for students at all levels. For high school students considering early exposure to healthcare studies, the best online schools for high school students can provide foundational courses and valuable insights into the medical field.

For those interested in supporting healthcare systems or working behind the scenes, medical billing and coding classes online offer a flexible way to start a healthcare career without a lengthy commitment. These programs prepare students for roles that are in high demand nationwide.

Aspiring nurses can benefit from affordable nursing programs online that balance quality education with flexible scheduling, making it easier to pursue nursing credentials while managing other commitments. Nurses looking to advance can take the next step with the cheapest np school options, opening up leadership and specialized practice opportunities.

Whether you’re just starting out or aiming to advance in your healthcare career, these online programs offer diverse and budget-friendly options tailored to your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey Lipman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles