World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Federico Pea

Federico Pea

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 50 4419 4067 143 138 275 10938

Federico Pea publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Federico Pea between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Federico Pea published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2023. 55 of the 372 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2023. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 41 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 30 publications
1990 2025

372 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Federico Pea: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 6
1993 3
1994 2
1995 4
1996 2
1997 3
1998 1
1999 5
2000 7
2001 6
2002 2
2003 8
2004 5
2005 5
2006 8
2007 6
2008 7
2009 13
2010 4
2011 9
2012 9
2013 7
2014 14
2015 18
2016 11
2017 11
2018 17
2019 10
2020 18
2021 31
2022 23
2023 41
2024 25
2025 30
Total 372
Download as CSV

Federico Pea publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Federico Pea sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 275–284 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 275 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148 275
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Federico Pea D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Federico Pea sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129 50
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study

    Giovanni Guaraldi;Marianna Meschiari;Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri;Jovana Milic

  • Antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill adult patients: a Position Paper .

    Mohd H. Abdul-Aziz;Jan Willem C. Alffenaar;Jan Willem C. Alffenaar;Matteo Bassetti;Hendrik Bracht

  • The effect of pathophysiology on pharmacokinetics in the critically ill patient — Concepts appraised by the example of antimicrobial agents☆

    Stijn I. Blot;Stijn I. Blot;Federico Pea;Jeffrey Lipman;Jeffrey Lipman

  • Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability

    Federico Pea;Pierluigi Viale;Mario Furlanut

  • Therapeutic drug monitoring may improve safety outcomes of long-term treatment with linezolid in adult patients

    Federico Pea;Pierluigi Viale;Piergiorgio Cojutti;Barbara Del Pin

  • Challenges in the management of chronic wound infections.

    Marco Falcone;Barbara De Angelis;Federico Pea;Alessandro Scalise

  • Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Linezolid: a Retrospective Monocentric Analysis

    Unknown

  • Bench-to-bedside review: Appropriate antibiotic therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock – does the dose matter?

    Federico Pea;Pierluigi Viale

  • Continuous versus intermittent infusion of vancomycin for the treatment of Gram-positive infections: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Maria Adriana Cataldo;Evelina Tacconelli;Elisabetta Grilli;Federico Pea

  • An international, multicentre survey of β-lactam antibiotic therapeutic drug monitoring practice in intensive care units

    Gloria Wong;Alexander Brinkman;Russell J Benefield;Mieke Carlier;Mieke Carlier

  • Teicoplanin therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients: a retrospective study emphasizing the importance of a loading dose

    Federico Pea;Loris Brollo;Pierluigi Viale;Federica Pavan

  • Consensus document on controversial issues for the treatment of infections of the central nervous system: bacterial brain abscesses.

    Massimo Arlotti;Paolo Grossi;Federico Pea;Giustino Tomei

  • The Antimicrobial Therapy Puzzle: Could Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationships Be Helpful in Addressing the Issue of Appropriate Pneumonia Treatment in Critically Ill Patients?

    Louis D. Saravolatz;Federico Pea;Pierluigi Viale

  • Pharmacokinetic aspects of treating infections in the intensive care unit: focus on drug interactions.

    Unknown

  • Prospectively validated dosing nomograms for maximizing the pharmacodynamics of vancomycin administered by continuous infusion in critically ill patients.

    Federico Pea;Mario Furlanut;Camilla Negri;Federica Pavan

  • Ceftolozane/tazobactam: place in therapy.

    Daniele Roberto Giacobbe;Matteo Bassetti;Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa;Valerio Del Bono

  • Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: A review of the currently available treatment options

    S.M. Purrello;J. Garau;E. Giamarellos;T. Mazzei

  • High vancomycin dosage regimens required by intensive care unit patients cotreated with drugs to improve haemodynamics following cardiac surgical procedures

    Unknown

  • Dosing nomograms for attaining optimum concentrations of meropenem by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with severe gram-negative infections: a pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics-based approach.

    Federico Pea;Pierluigi Viale;Piergiorgio Cojutti;Mario Furlanut

  • Reappraisal of Linezolid Dosing in Renal Impairment To Improve Safety.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierluigi Viale
Pierluigi Viale University of Bologna
Matteo Bassetti
Matteo Bassetti University of Genoa
Elda Righi
Elda Righi University of Verona
Gian Maria Rossolini
Gian Maria Rossolini University of Florence
William W. Hope
William W. Hope University of Liverpool
Nicola Petrosillo
Nicola Petrosillo National Institutes of Health
Jason A. Roberts
Jason A. Roberts University of Queensland
Stefania Stefani
Stefania Stefani University of Catania
Michele Baccarani
Michele Baccarani University of Bologna
Matteo Rinaldi
Matteo Rinaldi Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Federico Pea

Recently Published Articles