World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7971 7439 377 370 138 6113
Neuroscience 42 7698 7103 647 614 147 6185

Thomas Dresler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Dresler between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Dresler published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2014. 22 of the 194 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2014. 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 11 publications
2009 2025

194 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Dresler: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 6
2010 7
2011 9
2012 9
2013 15
2014 20
2015 12
2016 8
2017 16
2018 12
2019 19
2020 6
2021 10
2022 14
2023 9
2024 11
2025 11
Total 194
Download as CSV

Thomas Dresler publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Dresler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 138–147 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 147 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456 147
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Dresler D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Dresler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 42
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas Dresler is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a total of 71 publications. Their research primarily focuses on psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, and pathology and forensic medicine. Secondary areas of investigation include developmental and educational psychology as well as experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main topics covered in Dresler's research include:

  • Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Dresler has published in a variety of academic journals, frequently contributing to:

  • Der Schmerz
  • MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin
  • Scientific Reports
  • The Journal of Headache and Pain
  • Der Nervenarzt

Regarding collaborative work, Dresler has coauthored numerous papers with several researchers, including:

  • Ruth Ruscheweyh
  • Charly Gaul
  • Tim Jürgens
  • Ann-Christine Ehlis
  • Stefanie Förderreuther

Some of the recent papers authored by Dresler with their publication years and venues are:

  • "Management of medication overuse (MO) and medication overuse headache (MOH) S1 guideline," 2022, Neurological Research and Practice
  • "Insights from a laboratory and naturalistic investigation on stress, rumination and frontal brain functioning in MDD: An fNIRS study," 2021, Neurobiology of Stress
  • "Functional lateralization of arithmetic processing in the intraparietal sulcus is associated with handedness," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Trait rumination and social anxiety separately influence stress-induced rumination and hemodynamic responses," 2022, Scientific Reports
  • "Headache impact and socioeconomic status: findings from a study of the German Migraine and Headache Society (DMKG)," 2023, The Journal of Headache and Pain

Best Publications

  • Emotion regulation model in binge eating disorder and obesity--a systematic review.

    Elisabeth J. Leehr;Kerstin Krohmer;Kathrin Schag;Thomas Dresler

  • Application of functional near-infrared spectroscopy in psychiatry.

    Ann-Christine Ehlis;Sabrina Schneider;Thomas Dresler;Andreas J. Fallgatter

  • Understanding the nature of psychiatric comorbidity in migraine: a systematic review focused on interactions and treatment implications.

    Thomas Dresler;Salvatore Caratozzolo;Kaat Guldolf;Jana-Isabel Huhn

  • Emotional Stroop task: effect of word arousal and subject anxiety on emotional interference.

    Thomas Dresler;Thomas Dresler;Katja Mériau;Hauke R. Heekeren;Elke van der Meer

  • Revise the revised? New dimensions of the neuroanatomical hypothesis of panic disorder

    Thomas Dresler;Thomas Dresler;Anne Guhn;Sara V. Tupak;Ann-Christine Ehlis

  • Integrating neurobiological markers of depression.

    Tim Hahn;Andre F. Marquand;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Thomas Dresler

  • Neural response to reward anticipation is modulated by Gray's impulsivity.

    Tim Hahn;Thomas Dresler;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Michael M. Plichta

  • Impairment in episodic and chronic cluster headache

    Tim P Jürgens;Tim P Jürgens;Charly Gaul;Andrea Lindwurm;Thomas Dresler

  • A review about functional illiteracy: Definition, cognitive, linguistic, and numerical aspects.

    Réka Vágvölgyi;Andra Coldea;Thomas Dresler;Josef Schrader;Josef Schrader

  • Association between reward‐related activation in the ventral striatum and trait reward sensitivity is moderated by dopamine transporter genotype

    Tim Hahn;Sebastian Heinzel;Thomas Dresler;Michael M. Plichta

  • Reconstructing functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals impaired by extra-cranial confounds: an easy-to-use filter method.

    Florian B. Haeussinger;Thomas Dresler;Sebastian Heinzel;Martin Schecklmann

  • Implicit emotion regulation in the presence of threat: neural and autonomic correlates.

    Sara V. Tupak;Sara V. Tupak;Thomas Dresler;Anne Guhn;Ann-Christine Ehlis

  • Applications of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) in Studying Cognitive Development: The Case of Mathematics and Language.

    Mojtaba Soltanlou;Maria A. Sitnikova;Hans-Christoph Nuerk;Hans-Christoph Nuerk;Thomas Dresler

  • Differential prefrontal and frontotemporal oxygenation patterns during phonemic and semantic verbal fluency.

    Sara V. Tupak;Meike Badewien;Thomas Dresler;Thomas Dresler;Tim Hahn;Tim Hahn

  • Prefrontal activation patterns of automatic and regulated approach-avoidance reactions - a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.

    Lena H. Ernst;Michael M. Plichta;Elisabeth Lutz;Anna K. Zesewitz

  • Medial prefrontal cortex stimulation modulates the processing of conditioned fear.

    Anne Guhn;Thomas Dresler;Marta Andreatta;Laura D. Müller

  • Entspannungsverfahren und verhaltenstherapeutische Interventionen zur Behandlung der Migräne : Leitlinie der Deutschen Migräne- und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft

    P. Kropp;B. Meyer;T. Dresler;G. Fritsche

  • Activation during the Trail Making Test measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy in healthy elderly subjects

    Katja Hagen;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Florian B. Haeussinger;Sebastian Heinzel;Sebastian Heinzel

  • Treatment of migraine attacks and prevention of migraine: Guidelines by the German Migraine and Headache Society and the German Society of Neurology:

    Hans-Christoph Diener;Dagny Holle-Lee;Steffen Nägel;Thomas Dresler

  • Reduced prefrontal oxygenation during object and spatial visual working memory in unpolar and bipolar depression.

    Martin Schecklmann;Martin Schecklmann;Thomas Dresler;Stefanie Beck;Johanna T. Jay

  • SCoRS—A Method Based on Stability for Feature Selection and Mapping in Neuroimaging

    Jane M. Rondina;Tim Hahn;Leticia de Oliveira;Andre F. Marquand

  • NIRS-based neurofeedback training in a virtual reality classroom for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Friederike Blume;Justin Hudak;Thomas Dresler;Ann-Christine Ehlis

  • A Review about Functional Illiteracy : Definition, Cognitive, Linguistic, and Numerical Aspects

    Réka Vágvölgyi;Andra Coldea;Thomas Dresler;Thomas Schrader

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas J. Fallgatter
Andreas J. Fallgatter University of Tübingen
Ann-Christine Ehlis
Ann-Christine Ehlis University of Tübingen
Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Hans-Christoph Nuerk University of Tübingen
Martin J. Herrmann
Martin J. Herrmann University of Würzburg
Michael M. Plichta
Michael M. Plichta Goethe University Frankfurt
Andreas Reif
Andreas Reif Goethe University Frankfurt
Jürgen Deckert
Jürgen Deckert University of Würzburg
Klaus-Peter Lesch
Klaus-Peter Lesch University of Würzburg
Martin Schecklmann
Martin Schecklmann University of Regensburg
Andreas Straube
Andreas Straube Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience graduates often explore a wide range of related fields for advanced study and career growth. Online degree programs in psychology and social sciences are especially popular for those aiming to complement their neuroscience background with applied mental health skills or clinical practice.

For students considering therapy careers, accredited mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) can be a fitting option, blending neuroscience knowledge with practical therapy approaches. Students interested in mental health can deepen their expertise with a graduate degree, but cost is often a concern. Learn how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology and compare tuition and aid options.

For those starting out, it’s possible to save on tuition by choosing the cheapest psychology degree online, which still offers a robust academic foundation. If social work is your calling, consider applying to the easiest online msw program to gain practical skills with less competitive entry requirements.

Each of these degrees can pave the way for diverse career pathways, from research to clinical roles, and are excellent complements to neuroscience studies.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Dresler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles