World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
6113
World Ranking
7971
National Ranking
377

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
6185
World Ranking
7698
National Ranking
647

Thomas Dresler publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Dresler sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 147 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Thomas Dresler D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Dresler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Dresler is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a total of 71 publications. Their research primarily focuses on psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, and pathology and forensic medicine. Secondary areas of investigation include developmental and educational psychology as well as experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main topics covered in Dresler's research include:

  • Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Dresler has published in a variety of academic journals, frequently contributing to:

  • Der Schmerz
  • MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin
  • Scientific Reports
  • The Journal of Headache and Pain
  • Der Nervenarzt

Regarding collaborative work, Dresler has coauthored numerous papers with several researchers, including:

  • Ruth Ruscheweyh
  • Charly Gaul
  • Tim Jürgens
  • Ann-Christine Ehlis
  • Stefanie Förderreuther

Some of the recent papers authored by Dresler with their publication years and venues are:

  • "Management of medication overuse (MO) and medication overuse headache (MOH) S1 guideline," 2022, Neurological Research and Practice
  • "Insights from a laboratory and naturalistic investigation on stress, rumination and frontal brain functioning in MDD: An fNIRS study," 2021, Neurobiology of Stress
  • "Functional lateralization of arithmetic processing in the intraparietal sulcus is associated with handedness," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Trait rumination and social anxiety separately influence stress-induced rumination and hemodynamic responses," 2022, Scientific Reports
  • "Headache impact and socioeconomic status: findings from a study of the German Migraine and Headache Society (DMKG)," 2023, The Journal of Headache and Pain

Best Publications

  • Emotion regulation model in binge eating disorder and obesity--a systematic review.

    Elisabeth J. Leehr;Kerstin Krohmer;Kathrin Schag;Thomas Dresler

  • Application of functional near-infrared spectroscopy in psychiatry.

    Ann-Christine Ehlis;Sabrina Schneider;Thomas Dresler;Andreas J. Fallgatter

  • Understanding the nature of psychiatric comorbidity in migraine: a systematic review focused on interactions and treatment implications.

    Thomas Dresler;Salvatore Caratozzolo;Kaat Guldolf;Jana-Isabel Huhn

  • Emotional Stroop task: effect of word arousal and subject anxiety on emotional interference.

    Thomas Dresler;Thomas Dresler;Katja Mériau;Hauke R. Heekeren;Elke van der Meer

  • Revise the revised? New dimensions of the neuroanatomical hypothesis of panic disorder

    Thomas Dresler;Thomas Dresler;Anne Guhn;Sara V. Tupak;Ann-Christine Ehlis

  • Integrating neurobiological markers of depression.

    Tim Hahn;Andre F. Marquand;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Thomas Dresler

  • Neural response to reward anticipation is modulated by Gray's impulsivity.

    Tim Hahn;Thomas Dresler;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Michael M. Plichta

  • Impairment in episodic and chronic cluster headache

    Tim P Jürgens;Tim P Jürgens;Charly Gaul;Andrea Lindwurm;Thomas Dresler

  • A review about functional illiteracy: Definition, cognitive, linguistic, and numerical aspects.

    Réka Vágvölgyi;Andra Coldea;Thomas Dresler;Josef Schrader;Josef Schrader

  • Association between reward‐related activation in the ventral striatum and trait reward sensitivity is moderated by dopamine transporter genotype

    Tim Hahn;Sebastian Heinzel;Thomas Dresler;Michael M. Plichta

  • Reconstructing functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals impaired by extra-cranial confounds: an easy-to-use filter method.

    Florian B. Haeussinger;Thomas Dresler;Sebastian Heinzel;Martin Schecklmann

  • Implicit emotion regulation in the presence of threat: neural and autonomic correlates.

    Sara V. Tupak;Sara V. Tupak;Thomas Dresler;Anne Guhn;Ann-Christine Ehlis

  • Applications of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) in Studying Cognitive Development: The Case of Mathematics and Language.

    Mojtaba Soltanlou;Maria A. Sitnikova;Hans-Christoph Nuerk;Hans-Christoph Nuerk;Thomas Dresler

  • Differential prefrontal and frontotemporal oxygenation patterns during phonemic and semantic verbal fluency.

    Sara V. Tupak;Meike Badewien;Thomas Dresler;Thomas Dresler;Tim Hahn;Tim Hahn

  • Prefrontal activation patterns of automatic and regulated approach-avoidance reactions - a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.

    Lena H. Ernst;Michael M. Plichta;Elisabeth Lutz;Anna K. Zesewitz

  • Medial prefrontal cortex stimulation modulates the processing of conditioned fear.

    Anne Guhn;Thomas Dresler;Marta Andreatta;Laura D. Müller

  • Entspannungsverfahren und verhaltenstherapeutische Interventionen zur Behandlung der Migräne : Leitlinie der Deutschen Migräne- und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft

    P. Kropp;B. Meyer;T. Dresler;G. Fritsche

  • Activation during the Trail Making Test measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy in healthy elderly subjects

    Katja Hagen;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Florian B. Haeussinger;Sebastian Heinzel;Sebastian Heinzel

  • Treatment of migraine attacks and prevention of migraine: Guidelines by the German Migraine and Headache Society and the German Society of Neurology:

    Hans-Christoph Diener;Dagny Holle-Lee;Steffen Nägel;Thomas Dresler

  • Reduced prefrontal oxygenation during object and spatial visual working memory in unpolar and bipolar depression.

    Martin Schecklmann;Martin Schecklmann;Thomas Dresler;Stefanie Beck;Johanna T. Jay

  • SCoRS—A Method Based on Stability for Feature Selection and Mapping in Neuroimaging

    Jane M. Rondina;Tim Hahn;Leticia de Oliveira;Andre F. Marquand

  • NIRS-based neurofeedback training in a virtual reality classroom for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Friederike Blume;Justin Hudak;Thomas Dresler;Ann-Christine Ehlis

  • A Review about Functional Illiteracy : Definition, Cognitive, Linguistic, and Numerical Aspects

    Réka Vágvölgyi;Andra Coldea;Thomas Dresler;Thomas Schrader

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas J. Fallgatter
Andreas J. Fallgatter University of Tübingen
Ann-Christine Ehlis
Ann-Christine Ehlis University of Tübingen
Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Hans-Christoph Nuerk University of Tübingen
Martin J. Herrmann
Martin J. Herrmann University of Würzburg
Michael M. Plichta
Michael M. Plichta Goethe University Frankfurt
Andreas Reif
Andreas Reif Goethe University Frankfurt
Jürgen Deckert
Jürgen Deckert University of Würzburg
Klaus-Peter Lesch
Klaus-Peter Lesch University of Würzburg
Martin Schecklmann
Martin Schecklmann University of Regensburg
Andreas Straube
Andreas Straube Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience graduates often explore a wide range of related fields for advanced study and career growth. Online degree programs in psychology and social sciences are especially popular for those aiming to complement their neuroscience background with applied mental health skills or clinical practice.

For students considering therapy careers, accredited mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) can be a fitting option, blending neuroscience knowledge with practical therapy approaches. Students interested in mental health can deepen their expertise with a graduate degree, but cost is often a concern. Learn how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology and compare tuition and aid options.

For those starting out, it’s possible to save on tuition by choosing the cheapest psychology degree online, which still offers a robust academic foundation. If social work is your calling, consider applying to the easiest online msw program to gain practical skills with less competitive entry requirements.

Each of these degrees can pave the way for diverse career pathways, from research to clinical roles, and are excellent complements to neuroscience studies.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Dresler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles