World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 82 1335 1187 159 146 306 23772

John Gruzelier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Gruzelier between 1970 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Gruzelier published across 51 years, from 1970 to 2020, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 1993. 1 of the 313 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 1993. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 2 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 7 publications 1982: 8 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 14 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 17 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication
1970 2020

313 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Gruzelier: publications per year, 1970 to 2020
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 2
1973 2
1974 2
1975 3
1976 1
1977 2
1978 4
1979 2
1980 3
1981 7
1982 8
1983 4
1984 14
1985 7
1986 8
1987 5
1988 3
1989 6
1990 4
1991 4
1992 0
1993 17
1994 7
1995 7
1996 17
1997 14
1998 13
1999 12
2000 7
2001 13
2002 10
2003 12
2004 11
2005 16
2006 7
2007 2
2008 1
2009 6
2010 6
2011 15
2012 1
2013 3
2014 14
2015 2
2016 2
2017 3
2018 2
2019 0
2020 1
Total 313
Download as CSV

John Gruzelier publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Gruzelier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 306 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 306
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John Gruzelier D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Gruzelier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112 82
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John Gruzelier is affiliated with Goldsmiths University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience and medicine, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and cardiology-related topics.

The scientist has contributed to the following recent paper:

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, published in Brain

Frequent coauthors collaborating with John Gruzelier include:

  • Tomas Ros
  • Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert
  • Vadim Zotev
  • Kymberly D. Young
  • Guilherme Wood

John Gruzelier's publications have appeared notably in the journal Brain, representing the primary publication venue listed.

Their main fields of study are:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine

The subfields of study covered include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

The principal research topics addressed in their work include:

  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Best Publications

  • Paradox lost? Exploring the role of alpha oscillations during externally vs. internally directed attention and the implications for idling and inhibition hypotheses.

    Nicholas R Cooper;Rodney J Croft;Samuel J.J Dominey;Adrian P Burgess

  • The effect of training distinct neurofeedback protocols on aspects of cognitive performance

    David Vernon;Tobias Egner;Nicolas Cooper;Theresa Compton

  • Neurofeedback Treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children: A Comparison with Methylphenidate

    Thomas Fuchs;Niels Birbaumer;Niels Birbaumer;Werner Lutzenberger;John H. Gruzelier

  • Psychobiology of altered states of Consciousness

    Dieter Vaitl;Niels Birbaumer;John Gruzelier;Graham A. Jamieson

  • EEG-neurofeedback for optimising performance. I: A review of cognitive and affective outcome in healthy participants

    John H. Gruzelier

  • EEG biofeedback of low beta band components: frequency-specific effects on variables of attention and event-related brain potentials.

    Tobias Egner;John Gruzelier

  • Impairments on neuropsychologic tests of temporohippocampal and frontohippocampal functions and word fluency in remitting schizophrenia and affective disorders.

    John Gruzelier;Karen Seymour;Lesley Wilson;Anthony Jolley

  • Impaired auditory frequency discrimination in dyslexia detected with mismatch evoked potentials.

    Torsten Baldeweg;Alexandra Richardson;Sarah Watkins;Christine Foale

  • Learned self-regulation of EEG frequency components affects attention and event-related brain potentials in humans.

    Tobias Egner;John H. Gruzelier

  • Gamma and beta frequency oscillations in response to novel auditory stimuli: A comparison of human electroencephalogram (EEG) data with in vitro models

    Corinna Haenschel;Torsten Baldeweg;Rodney J. Croft;Miles Whittington

  • Ecological validity of neurofeedback: modulation of slow wave EEG enhances musical performance.

    Tobias Egner;John H. Gruzelier

  • Psychobiology of altered states of consciousness.

    Dieter Vaitl;Niels Birbaumer;John Gruzelier;Graham A. Jamieson

  • Mismatch negativity potentials and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia

    Torsten Baldeweg;Anthony Klugman;John Gruzelier;Stephen R. Hirsch

  • EEG applications for sport and performance

    Trevor Thompson;Tony Steffert;Tomas Ros;Joseph Leach

  • Electroencephalographic Biofeedback in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Vincent J. Monastra;Steven Lynn;Michael Linden;Joel F. Lubar

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist)

    Tomas Ros;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Vadim Zotev;Kymberly D Young

  • Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe

    Tobias Egner;Graham A. Jamieson;John Gruzelier

  • Event-Related Brain Potential Correlates of Human Auditory Sensory Memory-Trace Formation

    Corinna Haenschel;David J. Vernon;Prabuddh Dwivedi;John H. Gruzelier

  • Bimodality and lateral asymmetry of skin conductance orienting activity in schizophrenics: replication and evidence of lateral asymmetry in patients with depression and disorders of personality.

    John Gruzelier;Peter Venables

  • EEG-neurofeedback for optimising performance. III: A review of methodological and theoretical considerations.

    John H. Gruzelier

  • The relative contributions of ecstasy and cannabis to cognitive impairment

    Rodney J. Croft;Alex J. Mackay;Alex T.D. Mills;John G.H. Gruzelier

Frequent Co-Authors

Torsten Baldeweg
Torsten Baldeweg University College London
John F. Connolly
John F. Connolly McMaster University
Tobias Egner
Tobias Egner Duke University
Rodney J. Croft
Rodney J. Croft University of Wollongong
Niels Birbaumer
Niels Birbaumer University of Tübingen
Jochen Kaiser
Jochen Kaiser Goethe University Frankfurt
Dietrich Lehmann
Dietrich Lehmann University of Zurich
Panagiotis D. Bamidis
Panagiotis D. Bamidis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Andrea Kübler
Andrea Kübler University of Würzburg
Joel F. Lubar
Joel F. Lubar University of Tennessee at Knoxville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens up several rewarding career pathways, particularly in counseling and therapy. One of the most popular paths is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), which combines clinical expertise with a strong understanding of human behavior and relationships. To pursue this career, requirements can vary greatly depending on location and state regulations.

For example, those interested in learning how to become an mft in Fresno will find that California has its own specific licensure process, including education, supervised clinical hours, and examinations. Sometimes, there are strict academic prerequisites such as the Garland mft education requirements, which detail what foundational courses and degrees you must complete.

In cities like Gilbert, you’ll want to understand the Gilbert mft certification requirements, including the steps for state certification and ongoing professional development. Prospective therapists should also research how to become an mft in Glendale, as licensure rules and career opportunities can differ between regions. Online psychology degrees can provide the flexibility needed to meet these requirements while preparing for a fulfilling career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing John Gruzelier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles