World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
11588
World Ranking
5393
National Ranking
2949

Joel F. Lubar publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel F. Lubar sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joel F. Lubar D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel F. Lubar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joel F. Lubar is affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Photoreceptor and Optogenetics Research, Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control, as well as Neural Dynamics and Brain Function.

They have contributed extensively to academic literature, with notable papers such as:

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, Brain
  • Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial of Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder With 13-Month Follow-up, 2020, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • EEG Connectivity in ADHD Compared to a Normative Database: A Cohort Analysis of 120 Subjects from the ICAN Study, 2022, Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
  • Reversal of Acquired Prosopagnosia Using Quantitative Electroencephalography-Guided Laser Therapy, 2022, Photobiomodulation Photomedicine and Laser Surgery
  • International QEEG Certification Board Guideline Minimum Technical Requirements for Performing Clinical Quantitative Electroencephalography, 2025, Clinical EEG and Neuroscience

Their research has been published multiple times in venues such as the Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Brain, Photobiomodulation Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, and Clinical EEG and Neuroscience.

Joel F. Lubar has frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Cynthia Kerson
  • Robert W. Thatcher
  • Roger deBeus
  • Robert R. Rice
  • Carl J. Biver

Best Publications

  • Reward deficiency syndrome: a biogenetic model for the diagnosis and treatment of impulsive, addictive, and compulsive behaviors.

    Kenneth Blum;Eric R. Braverman;Jay M. Holder;Joel F. Lubar

  • Discourse on the development of EEG diagnostics and biofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders.

    Joel F. Lubar

  • Quantitative analysis of EEG in boys with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder: Controlled study with clinical implications

    Christopher A. Mann;Joel F. Lubar;Andrew W. Zimmerman;Andrew W. Zimmerman;Christopher A. Miller;Christopher A. Miller

  • Evaluation of the effectiveness of EEG neurofeedback training for ADHD in a clinical setting as measured by changes in T.O.V.A. scores, behavioral ratings, and WISC-R performance.

    Joel F. Lubar;Michie Odle Swartwood;Jeffery N. Swartwood;Phyllis H. O'Donnell

  • Assessing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder via quantitative electroencephalography: an initial validation study.

    Vincent J Monastra;Joel F Lubar;Michael Linden;Peter VanDeusen

  • EEG and behavioral changes in a hyperkinetic child concurrent with training of the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR): a preliminary report

    Joel F. Lubar;Margaret N. Shouse

  • EEG neurofeedback: a brief overview and an example of peak alpha frequency training for cognitive enhancement in the elderly.

    Efthymios Angelakis;Stamatina Stathopoulou;Jennifer L Frymiare;Deborah L Green

  • Electroencephalographic Biofeedback in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Vincent J. Monastra;Steven Lynn;Michael Linden;Joel F. Lubar

  • Peak alpha frequency: an electroencephalographic measure of cognitive preparedness.

    Efthymios Angelakis;Joel F Lubar;Stamatina Stathopoulou;John Kounios

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist)

    Tomas Ros;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Vadim Zotev;Kymberly D Young

  • The development of a quantitative electroencephalographic scanning process for attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder: Reliability and validity studies.

    Vincent J. Monastra;Joel F. Lubar;Michael Linden

  • Attention-Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder and Reward Deficiency Syndrome

    Kenneth Blum;Amanda Lih Chuan Chen;Eric R. Braverman;David E. Comings

  • Neurofeedback and Basic Learning Theory: Implications for Research and Practice

    Leslie H. Sherlin;Martijn Arns;Joel Lubar;Hartmut Heinrich

  • Behavioral management of epileptic seizures following EEG biofeedback training of the sensorimotor rhythm.

    Joel F. Lubar;W. W. Bahler

  • Low-Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography Neurofeedback

    Marco Congedo;Joel Lubar;D. Joffe

  • Overcoming qEEG abnormalities and reward gene deficits during protracted abstinence in male psychostimulant and polydrug abusers utilizing putative dopamine D₂ agonist therapy: part 2.

    Kenneth Blum;Thomas J H Chen;Siobhan Morse;John Giordano

  • Electroencephalographic peak alpha frequency correlates of cognitive traits.

    Efthymios Angelakis;Joel F. Lubar;Stamatina Stathopoulou

  • Neurofeedback for the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders.

    Joel F. Lubar

  • Low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) of cerebral activity in chronic depressive disorder ☆

    Joel F. Lubar;Marco Congedo;John H. Askew

  • Generational Association Studies of Dopaminergic Genes in Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) Subjects: Selecting Appropriate Phenotypes for Reward Dependence Behaviors

    Kenneth Blum;Amanda L. C. Chen;Marlene Oscar-Berman;Thomas J. H. Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Congedo
Marco Congedo Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Kenneth Blum
Kenneth Blum University of Florida
Martijn Arns
Martijn Arns Brainclinics
David E. Comings
David E. Comings City Of Hope National Medical Center
L. Eugene Arnold
L. Eugene Arnold The Ohio State University
John Gruzelier
John Gruzelier Goldsmiths University of London
Marlene Oscar-Berman
Marlene Oscar-Berman Boston University
Daniel Brandeis
Daniel Brandeis University of Zurich
Ute Strehl
Ute Strehl University of Tübingen
John Kounios
John Kounios Drexel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse online education options and rewarding career paths. Many students are drawn to specialized fields such as Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), where becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a popular choice. Each state and city often has unique requirements and educational pathways for aspiring BCBAs.

To understand specific qualifications, prospective students can research Gilbert bcba education requirements or learn the step-by-step process with advice on how to become a bcba in Glendale. If you’re interested in relocating, reviewing Greensboro bcba requirements or Henderson bcba education requirements may help you decide where to start your journey.

Online degree programs offer flexibility for those balancing work, family, or other commitments. By understanding regional requirements, you can better plan your education and career, ensuring you meet all the credentials for a successful future in psychology or behavioral health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Joel F. Lubar

Trending Scientists