World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
33342
World Ranking
3457
National Ranking
1945

Daniel S. Weiss publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Weiss sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 133 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel S. Weiss D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Weiss sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel S. Weiss is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their work is situated within an academic environment known for contributions to medical and scientific research.

While detailed information on publications, co-authors, and specific research topics is not available, the association with the University of California, San Francisco suggests involvement in fields aligned with biomedical sciences or related disciplines.

The absence of listed recent papers and publications limits a comprehensive understanding of their research contributions and focus areas. Similarly, there is no available data on awards, collaborations, or recognized research themes.

Despite limited publicly accessible data, the professional connection to a major research institution may indicate participation in ongoing scientific studies, potentially encompassing interdisciplinary approaches within health sciences.

Best Publications

  • Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis.

    Emily J. Ozer;Suzanne R. Best;Tami L. Lipsey;Daniel S. Weiss

  • The Impact of Event Scale: Revised

    Daniel S. Weiss

  • Trauma and the Vietnam war generation: Report of findings from the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study.

    Richard A. Kulka;William E. Schlenger;John A. Fairbank;Richard L. Hough

  • Problems in families of male Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.

    B. K. Jordan;C. R. Marmar;John A. Fairbank;W. E. Schlenger

  • Peritraumatic dissociation and posttraumatic stress in male Vietnam theater veterans.

    Marmar Cr;Weiss Ds;Schlenger We;Fairbank Ja

  • Impact of Event Scale: a cross-validation study and some empirical evidence supporting a conceptual model of stress response syndromes.

    Nathan J. Zilberg;Daniel S. Weiss;Mardi J. Horowitz

  • The Peritraumatic Distress Inventory: A Proposed Measure of PTSD Criterion A2

    Alain Brunet;Daniel S. Weiss;Thomas J. Metzler;Suzanne R. Best

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder and functioning and quality of life outcomes in a nationally representative sample of male Vietnam veterans.

    Douglas F. Zatzick;Charles R. Marmar;Daniel S. Weiss;Warren S. Browner

  • Sleep disturbances in the Vietnam generation: findings from a nationally representative sample of male Vietnam veterans.

    Thomas C. Neylan;Charles R. Marmar;Thomas J. Metzler;Daniel S. Weiss

  • Predictors of posttraumatic stress in police and other first responders.

    Charles R. Marmar;Charles R. Marmar;Shannon E. McCASLIN;Shannon E. McCASLIN;Thomas J. Metzler;Thomas J. Metzler;Suzanne Best

  • The Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire.

    Charles R. Marmar;Daniel S. Weiss;Thomas J. Metzler

  • Routine occupational stress and psychological distress in police

    Akiva M. Liberman;Suzanne R. Best;Thomas J. Metzler;Jeffrey A. Fagan

  • The prevalence of lifetime and partial post-traumatic stress disorder in vietnam theater veterans

    Daniel S. Weiss;Charles R. Marmar;William E. Schlenger;John A. Fairbank

  • Characteristics of emergency services personnel related to peritraumatic dissociation during critical incident exposure.

    Charles R. Marmar;Daniel S. Weiss;Thomas J. Metzler;Kevin Delucchi

  • Predicting symptomatic distress in emergency services personnel.

    Daniel S. Weiss;Charles R. Marmar;Thomas J. Metzler;Heidi M. Ronfeldt

  • Psychological trauma and PTSD in HIV-positive women: a meta-analysis.

    E. L. Machtinger;T. C. Wilson;Jessica E. Haberer;D. S. Weiss

  • The prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in the Vietnam generation : a multimethod, multisource assessment of psychiatric disorder

    William E. Schlenger;Richard A. Kulka;John A. Fairbank;Richard L. Hough

  • Longitudinal course and predictors of continuing distress following critical incident exposure in emergency services personnel.

    Charles R. Marmar;Daniel S. Weiss;Thomas J. Metzler;Kevin L. Delucchi

  • Impact of Event Scale--Revised

    Daniel S. Weiss;Charles R. Marmar

  • Lifetime and Current Prevalence of Specific Psychiatric Disorders Among Vietnam Veterans and Controls

    B Jordan;William Schlenger;R Hough;Richard Kulka

  • Stress responses of emergency services personnel to the loma prieta earthquake interstate 880 freeway collapse and control traumatic incidents

    Charles R. Marmar;Daniel S. Weiss;Thomas J. Metzler;Heidi M. Ronfeldt

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles R. Marmar
Charles R. Marmar New York University
Thomas J. Metzler
Thomas J. Metzler Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center
Thomas C. Neylan
Thomas C. Neylan University of California, San Francisco
Mardi J. Horowitz
Mardi J. Horowitz University of California, San Francisco
Jeffrey Fagan
Jeffrey Fagan Columbia University
Kevin L. Delucchi
Kevin L. Delucchi University of California, San Francisco
John A. Fairbank
John A. Fairbank Duke University
Alain Brunet
Alain Brunet McGill University
Emily J. Ozer
Emily J. Ozer University of California, Berkeley
David C. Mohr
David C. Mohr Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens diverse career opportunities, especially in mental health counseling. If you’re considering this field, it’s essential to understand each region’s unique educational and certification requirements.

For instance, students aiming to become counselors in Cincinnati should familiarize themselves with the Cincinnati mental health counselor education requirements. Similarly, licensure standards in Cleveland can be reviewed via the Cleveland mental health counselor certification requirements.

If you plan to practice in Colorado, you’ll want to understand the mental health counselor requirements in Colorado Springs. Meanwhile, those considering opportunities in Ohio’s capital should check out the specific Columbus mental health counselor education requirements.

By comparing these pathways, you can choose a program that matches your career goals and ensure you’re meeting state-specific standards. Online programs offer flexibility, but always research your intended location’s requirements for coursework, practica, and certification to maximize future opportunities in counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel S. Weiss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles