World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 60 3457 3190 1945 1754 133 33342

Daniel S. Weiss publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel S. Weiss between 1974 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel S. Weiss published across 51 years, from 1974 to 2024, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2001. 1 of the 138 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2001. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1974 2024

138 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel S. Weiss: publications per year, 1974 to 2024
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 2
1978 1
1979 3
1980 0
1981 5
1982 4
1983 1
1984 3
1985 2
1986 5
1987 2
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 2
1992 3
1993 2
1994 3
1995 2
1996 5
1997 3
1998 4
1999 2
2000 4
2001 13
2002 4
2003 6
2004 2
2005 2
2006 9
2007 7
2008 2
2009 1
2010 6
2011 5
2012 9
2013 1
2014 0
2015 1
2016 1
2017 0
2018 2
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 138
Download as CSV

Daniel S. Weiss publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Weiss sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 133 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 133
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel S. Weiss D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Weiss sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 60
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel S. Weiss is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their work is situated within an academic environment known for contributions to medical and scientific research.

While detailed information on publications, co-authors, and specific research topics is not available, the association with the University of California, San Francisco suggests involvement in fields aligned with biomedical sciences or related disciplines.

The absence of listed recent papers and publications limits a comprehensive understanding of their research contributions and focus areas. Similarly, there is no available data on awards, collaborations, or recognized research themes.

Despite limited publicly accessible data, the professional connection to a major research institution may indicate participation in ongoing scientific studies, potentially encompassing interdisciplinary approaches within health sciences.

Best Publications

  • Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis.

    Emily J. Ozer;Suzanne R. Best;Tami L. Lipsey;Daniel S. Weiss

  • The Impact of Event Scale: Revised

    Daniel S. Weiss

  • Trauma and the Vietnam war generation: Report of findings from the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study.

    Richard A. Kulka;William E. Schlenger;John A. Fairbank;Richard L. Hough

  • Problems in families of male Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.

    B. K. Jordan;C. R. Marmar;John A. Fairbank;W. E. Schlenger

  • Peritraumatic dissociation and posttraumatic stress in male Vietnam theater veterans.

    Marmar Cr;Weiss Ds;Schlenger We;Fairbank Ja

  • Impact of Event Scale: a cross-validation study and some empirical evidence supporting a conceptual model of stress response syndromes.

    Nathan J. Zilberg;Daniel S. Weiss;Mardi J. Horowitz

  • The Peritraumatic Distress Inventory: A Proposed Measure of PTSD Criterion A2

    Alain Brunet;Daniel S. Weiss;Thomas J. Metzler;Suzanne R. Best

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder and functioning and quality of life outcomes in a nationally representative sample of male Vietnam veterans.

    Douglas F. Zatzick;Charles R. Marmar;Daniel S. Weiss;Warren S. Browner

  • Sleep disturbances in the Vietnam generation: findings from a nationally representative sample of male Vietnam veterans.

    Thomas C. Neylan;Charles R. Marmar;Thomas J. Metzler;Daniel S. Weiss

  • Predictors of posttraumatic stress in police and other first responders.

    Charles R. Marmar;Charles R. Marmar;Shannon E. McCASLIN;Shannon E. McCASLIN;Thomas J. Metzler;Thomas J. Metzler;Suzanne Best

  • The Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire.

    Charles R. Marmar;Daniel S. Weiss;Thomas J. Metzler

  • Routine occupational stress and psychological distress in police

    Akiva M. Liberman;Suzanne R. Best;Thomas J. Metzler;Jeffrey A. Fagan

  • The prevalence of lifetime and partial post-traumatic stress disorder in vietnam theater veterans

    Daniel S. Weiss;Charles R. Marmar;William E. Schlenger;John A. Fairbank

  • Characteristics of emergency services personnel related to peritraumatic dissociation during critical incident exposure.

    Charles R. Marmar;Daniel S. Weiss;Thomas J. Metzler;Kevin Delucchi

  • Predicting symptomatic distress in emergency services personnel.

    Daniel S. Weiss;Charles R. Marmar;Thomas J. Metzler;Heidi M. Ronfeldt

  • Psychological trauma and PTSD in HIV-positive women: a meta-analysis.

    E. L. Machtinger;T. C. Wilson;Jessica E. Haberer;D. S. Weiss

  • The prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in the Vietnam generation : a multimethod, multisource assessment of psychiatric disorder

    William E. Schlenger;Richard A. Kulka;John A. Fairbank;Richard L. Hough

  • Longitudinal course and predictors of continuing distress following critical incident exposure in emergency services personnel.

    Charles R. Marmar;Daniel S. Weiss;Thomas J. Metzler;Kevin L. Delucchi

  • Impact of Event Scale--Revised

    Daniel S. Weiss;Charles R. Marmar

  • Lifetime and Current Prevalence of Specific Psychiatric Disorders Among Vietnam Veterans and Controls

    B Jordan;William Schlenger;R Hough;Richard Kulka

  • Stress responses of emergency services personnel to the loma prieta earthquake interstate 880 freeway collapse and control traumatic incidents

    Charles R. Marmar;Daniel S. Weiss;Thomas J. Metzler;Heidi M. Ronfeldt

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles R. Marmar
Charles R. Marmar New York University
Thomas J. Metzler
Thomas J. Metzler Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center
Thomas C. Neylan
Thomas C. Neylan University of California, San Francisco
Mardi J. Horowitz
Mardi J. Horowitz University of California, San Francisco
Jeffrey Fagan
Jeffrey Fagan Columbia University
Kevin L. Delucchi
Kevin L. Delucchi University of California, San Francisco
John A. Fairbank
John A. Fairbank Duke University
Alain Brunet
Alain Brunet McGill University
Emily J. Ozer
Emily J. Ozer University of California, Berkeley
David C. Mohr
David C. Mohr Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens diverse career opportunities, especially in mental health counseling. If you’re considering this field, it’s essential to understand each region’s unique educational and certification requirements.

For instance, students aiming to become counselors in Cincinnati should familiarize themselves with the Cincinnati mental health counselor education requirements. Similarly, licensure standards in Cleveland can be reviewed via the Cleveland mental health counselor certification requirements.

If you plan to practice in Colorado, you’ll want to understand the mental health counselor requirements in Colorado Springs. Meanwhile, those considering opportunities in Ohio’s capital should check out the specific Columbus mental health counselor education requirements.

By comparing these pathways, you can choose a program that matches your career goals and ensure you’re meeting state-specific standards. Online programs offer flexibility, but always research your intended location’s requirements for coursework, practica, and certification to maximize future opportunities in counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel S. Weiss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles