World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
6417
World Ranking
7051
National Ranking
712

Elizabeth L. Clare publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth L. Clare sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 75 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Elizabeth L. Clare D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth L. Clare sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth L. Clare is affiliated with Queen Mary University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science, with significant contributions in agricultural and biological sciences.

The scientist's work extensively covers subfields such as ecology, ecological modeling, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, molecular biology, and insect science.

Main topics addressed include:

  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Marine animal studies overview

Elizabeth L. Clare has published frequently in several venues. The most prominent publication platforms include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Environmental DNA
  • PeerJ
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Molecular Ecology

Notable recent papers authored by Clare include:

  • "Measuring biodiversity from DNA in the air", 2022, Current Biology
  • "eDNAir: proof of concept that animal DNA can be collected from air sampling", 2021, PeerJ

Other frequently cited related papers in their field include works published in Environmental DNA and Molecular Ecology, reflecting broader collaborations and cross-disciplinary research trends.

Elizabeth L. Clare has collaborated often with a group of researchers, including:

  • Stephen J. Rossiter
  • Rosie Drinkwater
  • Owen T. Lewis
  • David Hemprich-Bennett
  • Nina R. Garrett

The scientist's research frequently intersects with studies involving DNA metabarcoding, biodiversity assessments, and environmental sampling methods. Their work contributes to understanding species diversity and ecological dynamics across different habitats and environmental conditions.

Best Publications

  • Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data?

    Bruce E. Deagle;Austen C. Thomas;Julie C. McInnes;Laurence J. Clarke;Laurence J. Clarke

  • Diet tracing in ecology: Method comparison and selection

    Jens M. Nielsen;Elizabeth L. Clare;Brian Hayden;Michael T. Brett

  • DNA barcoding of Neotropical bats: species identification and discovery within Guyana

    Elizabeth L. Clare;Burton K. Lim;Mark D. Engstrom;Judith L. Eger

  • Species on the menu of a generalist predator, the eastern red bat (Lasiurus borealis): using a molecular approach to detect arthropod prey.

    Elizabeth L. Clare;Erin E. Fraser;Heather E. Braid;M. Brock Fenton

  • Design and applicability of DNA arrays and DNA barcodes in biodiversity monitoring

    Mehrdad Hajibabaei;Gregory A.C. Singer;Elizabeth L. Clare;Paul D.N. Hebert

  • Eating local: influences of habitat on the diet of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus)

    E. L. Clare;B. R. Barber;B. W. Sweeney;P. D. N. Hebert

  • Molecular diet analysis of two african free-tailed bats (molossidae) using high throughput sequencing.

    Kristine Bohmann;Ara Monadjem;Christina Lehmkuhl Noer;Morten Rasmussen

  • Neotropical bats: Estimating species diversity with DNA barcodes

    Elizabeth L. Clare;Burton K. Lim;M. Brock Fenton;Paul D. N. Hebert

  • High‐throughput sequencing offers insight into mechanisms of resource partitioning in cryptic bat species

    Orly Razgour;Elizabeth L Clare;Matt R K Zeale;Julia Hanmer

  • Molecular detection of trophic interactions: emerging trends, distinct advantages, significant considerations and conservation applications.

    Elizabeth L. Clare

  • A pragmatic approach to the analysis of diets of generalist predators: the use of next‐generation sequencing with no blocking probes

    J. Piñol;V. San Andrés;E. L. Clare;E. L. Clare;Gisela Mir

  • The diet of Myotis lucifugus across Canada: assessing foraging quality and diet variability

    Elizabeth L. Clare;William Oliver Christian Symondson;Hugh Broders;François Fabianek

  • An inordinate fondness for beetles? Variation in seasonal dietary preferences of night‐roosting big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus)

    Elizabeth L. Clare;William O. C. Symondson;Melville Brockett Fenton

  • eDNAir: proof of concept that animal DNA can be collected from air sampling.

    Elizabeth L Clare;Chloe K Economou;Chris G Faulkes;James D Gilbert

  • Diversification and reproductive isolation: cryptic species in the only New World high-duty cycle bat, Pteronotus parnellii

    Elizabeth L Clare;Elizabeth L Clare;Amanda M Adams;Aline Z Maya-Simões;Aline Z Maya-Simões;Judith L Eger

  • Cryptic Species? Patterns of Maternal and Paternal Gene Flow in Eight Neotropical Bats

    Elizabeth L. Clare

  • Resource partitioning by insectivorous bats in Jamaica.

    Matthew A. Emrich;Elizabeth L. Clare;William Oliver Christian Symondson;Susan E. Koenig

  • Biodiversity assessment across a dynamic riverine system: A comparison of eDNA metabarcoding versus traditional fish surveying methods

    Jane Hallam;Jane Hallam;Elizabeth L. Clare;John Iwan Jones;Julia J. Day

  • The effects of parameter choice on defining molecular operational taxonomic units and resulting ecological analyses of metabarcoding data.

    Elizabeth Clare;Frédéric Jeremiah Joseph Chain;Joanne E Littlefair;Melania E Cristescu

  • Wound Healing in the Flight Membranes of Big Brown Bats

    Paul A. Faure;Daniel E. Re;Elizabeth L. Clare

  • Dietary competition between the alien Asian Musk Shrew (Suncus murinus) and a re‐introduced population of Telfair's Skink (Leiolopisma telfairii)

    David Steven Brown;Richard Burger;N. Cole;N. Cole;D. Vencatasamy

  • Dietary overlap and seasonality in three species of mormoopid bats from a tropical dry forest

    Valeria B Salinas-Ramos;L Gerardo Herrera Montalvo;Virginia León-Regagnon;Aitor Arrizabalaga-Escudero

  • Trophic niche flexibility in Glossophaga soricina: how a nectar seeker sneaks an insect snack

    Elizabeth L. Clare;Holger R. Goerlitz;Holger R. Goerlitz;Violaine A. Drapeau;Marc W. Holderied

Frequent Co-Authors

M. Brock Fenton
M. Brock Fenton University of Western Ontario
Stephen J. Rossiter
Stephen J. Rossiter Queen Mary University of London
Paul D. N. Hebert
Paul D. N. Hebert University of Guelph
Eleanor M. Slade
Eleanor M. Slade Nanyang Technological University
Nancy B. Simmons
Nancy B. Simmons American Museum of Natural History
M. Thomas P. Gilbert
M. Thomas P. Gilbert University of Copenhagen
Chris G. Faulkes
Chris G. Faulkes Queen Mary University of London
Gareth Jones
Gareth Jones University of Bristol
Jules M. Blais
Jules M. Blais University of Ottawa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution often leads to diverse career options, and related fields may expand your expertise and job prospects. For students looking to bridge their interests in biological sciences with mental health or behavioral studies, programs in counseling or psychology provide natural career pathways. Flexible fastest online counseling degree programs are an excellent choice for those who want to quickly gain credentials and start contributing to mental wellness services.

If you're interested in behavioral research, an what can you do with a masters in forensic psychology program may open doors in criminal justice, court systems, or law enforcement consulting. Likewise, those who wish to work with youth or families should explore accredited online child psychology degree programs that provide in-demand skills for schools, clinics, and community organizations.

Online learning makes further education more accessible. Consider pursuing online masters degrees in counseling if you are seeking roles that blend science, public service, and direct impact on people's lives. Each of these connected fields presents rewarding, flexible career paths for graduates with a background in ecology or evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth L. Clare

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles