World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
8622
World Ranking
4631
National Ranking
8

Eleanor M. Slade publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eleanor M. Slade sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 125 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Eleanor M. Slade D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eleanor M. Slade sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eleanor M. Slade is affiliated with Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. Their research spans several core areas within environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with a particular focus on ecology and landscape conservation.

Their work covers a range of subfields, including:

  • Ecology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecological Modeling

Within these subfields, they explore diverse topics such as:

  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Plant and animal studies

Key publications by Eleanor M. Slade include:

  • The environmental impacts of palm oil in context (2020, Nature Plants)
  • Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies (2020, Ecology Letters)
  • Landscape-scale benefits of protected areas for tropical biodiversity (2023, Nature)
  • Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: A global review and meta-analysis (2024, Ecology Letters)
  • Leech blood-meal invertebrate-derived DNA reveals differences in Bornean mammal diversity across habitats (2020, Molecular Ecology)

Their work frequently appears in a range of publication venues including:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Biotropica
  • Nature
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Ecology Letters

Among their frequent co-authors are:

  • Arthur Y. C. Chung
  • Joseph R. Williamson
  • Matthew J. Struebig
  • Owen T. Lewis
  • Stephen J. Rossiter

Best Publications

  • Functional identity and diversity of animals predict ecosystem functioning better than species-based indices

    Vesna Gagic;Ignasio Bartomeus;Tomas Jonsson;Astrid Taylor

  • Higher predation risk for insect prey at low latitudes and elevations

    Tomas Roslin;Tomas Roslin;Bess Hardwick;Vojtech Novotny;Vojtech Novotny;William K. Petry;William K. Petry

  • Experimental evidence for the effects of dung beetle functional group richness and composition on ecosystem function in a tropical forest.

    Eleanor M. Slade;Darren J. Mann;Jerome F. Villanueva;Owen T. Lewis

  • Research trends in ecosystem services provided by insects

    Jorge Ari Noriega;Joaquín Hortal;Joaquín Hortal;Francisco M. Azcárate;Matty P. Berg

  • The environmental impacts of palm oil in context

    Erik Meijaard;Erik Meijaard;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Kimberly M. Carlson;Eleanor M. Slade

  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Lawrence N. Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L.L. Hill;Samantha L.L. Hill

  • The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts

    Lawrence N Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L L Hill;Samantha L L Hill

  • Extinction filters mediate the global effects of habitat fragmentation on animals.

    Matthew G. Betts;Christopher Wolf;Marion Pfeifer;Cristina Banks-Leite

  • Biodiversity and ecosystem function of tropical forest dung beetles under contrasting logging regimes

    Eleanor M. Slade;Darren J. Mann;Owen T. Lewis

  • Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies.

    James I. Watling;Victor Arroyo‐Rodríguez;Marion Pfeifer;Lander Baeten

  • Experimental evidence for the interacting effects of forest edge, moisture and soil macrofauna on leaf litter decomposition

    Terhil Riutta;Eleanor M. Slade;Daniel P. Bebber;Michele E. Taylor

  • Macro-moth families differ in their attraction to light: implications for light-trap monitoring programmes

    Thomas Merckx;Thomas Merckx;Eleanor M. Slade;Eleanor M. Slade

  • The role of dung beetles in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from cattle farming

    Eleanor Margaret Slade;Terhi Riutta;Tomas Roslin;Tomas Roslin;Hanna Tuomisto

  • Life-history traits and landscape characteristics predict macro-moth responses to forest fragmentation

    Eleanor M. Slade;Eleanor M. Slade;Thomas Merckx;Thomas Merckx;Terhil Riutta;Daniel P. Bebber

  • Riparian buffers in tropical agriculture: Scientific support, effectiveness and directions for policy

    Sarah H. Luke;Sarah H. Luke;Eleanor M. Slade;Eleanor M. Slade;Claudia L. Gray;Kogila V. Annammala

  • Do riparian reserves support dung beetle biodiversity and ecosystem services in oil palm-dominated tropical landscapes?

    Claudia L. Gray;Eleanor M. Slade;Darren J. Mann;Owen T. Lewis

  • Trait-dependent response of dung beetle populations to tropical forest conversion at local and regional scales

    Elizabeth Nichols;Elizabeth Nichols;María Uriarte;Daniel E. Bunker;Mario E. Favila

  • Functionally rich dung beetle assemblages are required to provide multiple ecosystem services

    Paul Manning;Eleanor Margaret Slade;Eleanor Margaret Slade;Sarah A. Beynon;Owen T. Lewis

  • Species-rich dung beetle communities buffer ecosystem services in perturbed agro-ecosystems

    Sarah A. Beynon;Darren J. Mann;Eleanor M. Slade;Eleanor M. Slade;Owen T. Lewis

  • Quantifying beetle-mediated effects on gas fluxes from dung pats.

    Atte Penttilä;Eleanor M. Slade;Eleanor M. Slade;Asko Simojoki;Terhi Riutta

Frequent Co-Authors

Jos Barlow
Jos Barlow Lancaster University
Owen T. Lewis
Owen T. Lewis University of Oxford
Matthew J. Struebig
Matthew J. Struebig University of Kent
Tomas Roslin
Tomas Roslin Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Tom M. Fayle
Tom M. Fayle Queen Mary University of London
Jason M. Tylianakis
Jason M. Tylianakis University of Canterbury
Edgar C. Turner
Edgar C. Turner University of Cambridge
Stephen J. Rossiter
Stephen J. Rossiter Queen Mary University of London
Marc Ancrenaz
Marc Ancrenaz Sabah Wildlife Department
Tim Diekötter
Tim Diekötter Kiel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens the door to various online degrees and career routes in related fields. For those interested in environmental history or the evolution of ecosystems, the best online master's in history programs can provide a strong interdisciplinary foundation.

Many students also consider supporting fields such as library science, especially if they aim for roles in data curation or academic publishing. Understanding the cost of mlis degree us is crucial for planning your educational investment.

For those drawn to the biological and communication sciences, there are accredited options like asha approved online speech pathology programs. These programs can spark interdisciplinary careers at the intersection of ecology, evolution, and human health.

Even students without a specialized undergraduate background can pursue a career shift. slp bridge program options are tailored to help non-majors transition into communication sciences and speech-language pathology.

Best Scientists Citing Eleanor M. Slade

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles