World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
52
Citations
9044
World Ranking
3491
National Ranking
386

Stephen J. Rossiter publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Rossiter sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 194 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Stephen J. Rossiter D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Rossiter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen J. Rossiter is affiliated with Queen Mary University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, contributing extensively to related subfields such as ecology, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, ecological modeling, molecular biology, and global and planetary change.

Their work addresses a variety of scientific topics, including:

  • Bat biology and ecology studies
  • Species distribution and climate change
  • Environmental DNA in biodiversity studies
  • Conservation, biodiversity, and resource management
  • Wildlife ecology and conservation
  • Evolution and paleontology studies
  • Viral infections and vectors

Among recent publications, notable papers include:

  • "Large-scale genome sampling reveals unique immunity and metabolic adaptations in bats" (2021, Molecular Ecology)
  • "Bat conservation and zoonotic disease risk: a research agenda to prevent misguided persecution in the aftermath of COVID-19" (2020, Animal Conservation)
  • "Leech blood-meal invertebrate-derived DNA reveals differences in Bornean mammal diversity across habitats" (2020, Molecular Ecology)
  • "Convergent molecular evolution among ash species resistant to the emerald ash borer" (2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution)
  • "Riparian buffers act as microclimatic refugia in oil palm landscapes" (2020, Journal of Applied Ecology)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Rossiter include:

  • Owen T. Lewis
  • Elizabeth L. Clare
  • Matthew J. Struebig
  • Rosie Drinkwater
  • David Hemprich-Bennett

Rossiter's research has been published repeatedly in key venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Ecology
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide signatures of convergent evolution in echolocating mammals

    Joe Parker;Georgia Tsagkogeorga;James A. Cotton;James A. Cotton;Yuan Liu

  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Lawrence N. Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L.L. Hill;Samantha L.L. Hill

  • The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts

    Lawrence N Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L L Hill;Samantha L L Hill

  • Convergent sequence evolution between echolocating bats and dolphins

    Yang Liu;James A. Cotton;Bin Shen;Xiuqun Han

  • Phylogenomic Resolution of the Cetacean Tree of Life Using Target Sequence Capture

    Michael R McGowen;Michael R McGowen;Georgia Tsagkogeorga;Sandra Álvarez-Carretero;Mario Dos Reis

  • The evolution of color vision in nocturnal mammals

    Huabin Zhao;Stephen J. Rossiter;Emma C. Teeling;Chanjuan Li

  • Accelerated FoxP2 evolution in echolocating bats.

    Gang Li;Gang Li;Jinhong Wang;Stephen J. Rossiter;Gareth Jones

  • Harmonic-hopping in Wallacea's bats.

    Tigga Kingston;Stephen J. Rossiter;Stephen J. Rossiter

  • Phylogenomic Analyses Elucidate the Evolutionary Relationships of Bats

    Georgia Tsagkogeorga;Joe Parker;Elia Stupka;James A. Cotton

  • Parallel declines in species and genetic diversity in tropical forest fragments.

    Matthew J. Struebig;Tigga Kingston;Eric J. Petit;Steven C. Le Comber

  • Conservation value of forest fragments to Palaeotropical bats

    Matthew J. Struebig;Tigga Kingston;Akbar Zubaid;Adura Mohd-Adnan

  • Expert range maps of global mammal distributions harmonised to three taxonomic authorities

    Unknown

  • The hearing gene Prestin reunites echolocating bats.

    Gang Li;Jinhong Wang;Stephen J. Rossiter;Gareth Jones

  • Phylogeography of the greater horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum: contrasting results from mitochondrial and microsatellite data

    Jon Flanders;Gareth Jones;Petr Benda;Christian Dietz

  • Genetic variation and population structure in the endangered greater horseshoe bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum

    Stephen J. Rossiter;Stephen J. Rossiter;Gareth Jones;Roger D. Ransome;Elizabeth M. Barratt

  • Massive Losses of Taste Receptor Genes in Toothed and Baleen Whales

    Ping Feng;Jinsong Zheng;Stephen J. Rossiter;Ding Wang

  • Continent-wide panmixia of an African fruit bat facilitates transmission of potentially zoonotic viruses

    Alison J. Peel;Alison J. Peel;David R. Sargan;Kate S. Baker;Kate S. Baker;Kate S. Baker;David T. S. Hayman

  • Relatedness structure and kin-biased foraging in the greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum)

    Stephen J. Rossiter;Gareth Jones;Roger D. Ransome;Elizabeth M. Barratt

  • Genetic divergence and echolocation call frequency in cryptic species of Hipposideros larvatus s.l . (Chiroptera: Hipposideridae) from the Indo-Malayan region

    Adora Thabah;Stephen J. Rossiter;Stephen J. Rossiter;Tigga Kingston;Shuyi Zhang

  • What is comparable in comparative cognition

    Lars Chittka;Stephen J. Rossiter;Peter Skorupski;Chrisantha Fernando

  • Rangewide phylogeography in the greater horseshoe bat inferred from microsatellites: implications for population history, taxonomy and conservation

    Stephen J. Rossiter;Petr Benda;Christian Dietz;Shuyi Zhang

  • Parallel signatures of sequence evolution among hearing genes in echolocating mammals: an emerging model of genetic convergence.

    K T J Davies;J A Cotton;J A Cotton;J D Kirwan;E C Teeling

Frequent Co-Authors

Shuyi Zhang
Shuyi Zhang Shenyang Agricultural University
Gareth Jones
Gareth Jones University of Bristol
Matthew J. Struebig
Matthew J. Struebig University of Kent
Liliana M. Dávalos
Liliana M. Dávalos Stony Brook University
Eleanor M. Slade
Eleanor M. Slade Nanyang Technological University
Emma C. Teeling
Emma C. Teeling University College Dublin
Chris G. Faulkes
Chris G. Faulkes Queen Mary University of London
Tom M. Fayle
Tom M. Fayle Queen Mary University of London
James Cotton
James Cotton University of Glasgow
Tim Diekötter
Tim Diekötter Kiel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Ecology and Evolution often explore related fields and career pathways in health sciences. If you're considering a transition into nursing, there are online accelerated bsn programs for non nurses that can help you earn your BSN degree efficiently, providing a solid foundation for a scientific and patient-focused career.

For registered nurses seeking to advance their education, the shortest rn to bsn program options allow you to upgrade your credentials in as little as six months. These programs are ideal for those who want to quickly boost their qualifications and job prospects.

If you are curious about advanced practice roles, learning how to become a nurse practitioner can guide you through the fastest pathways to this respected and impactful position. Nurse practitioners play a key role in primary and specialized care and have diverse career options, including psychiatric care.

Compensation varies by specialization and location; you can discover how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make by state to better plan your career trajectory. Exploring these degree and career options can open doors for students with a passion for science, healthcare, and environmental impacts on health.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen J. Rossiter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles