World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David T. S. Hayman

David T. S. Hayman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 47 18650 17106 51 49 130 9152

David T. S. Hayman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David T. S. Hayman between 2008 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David T. S. Hayman published across 19 years, from 2008 to 2026, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 7 of the 151 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
2008 2026

151 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David T. S. Hayman: publications per year, 2008 to 2026
Year Publications
2008 2
2009 1
2010 3
2011 5
2012 11
2013 8
2014 8
2015 4
2016 12
2017 10
2018 7
2019 16
2020 10
2021 21
2022 3
2023 20
2024 3
2025 6
2026 1
Total 151
Download as CSV

David T. S. Hayman publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. S. Hayman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 130 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980 130
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

David T. S. Hayman D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. S. Hayman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504 47
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David T. S. Hayman is affiliated with Massey University in New Zealand. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on Infectious Diseases and Parasitology. Their work spans several subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Modeling and Simulation.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
  • Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Amoebic Infections and Treatments
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology

David T. S. Hayman's recent published papers feature:

  • Land-use change and the livestock revolution increase the risk of zoonotic coronavirus transmission from rhinolophid bats, 2021, Nature Food
  • A large scale waterborne Campylobacteriosis outbreak, Havelock North, New Zealand, 2020, Journal of Infection
  • Species and genotypes causing human cryptosporidiosis in New Zealand, 2020, Parasitology Research
  • One Health action for health security and equity, 2023, The Lancet
  • First report of novel assemblages and mixed infections of Giardia duodenalis in human isolates from New Zealand, 2021, Acta Tropica

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Matthew A. Knox
  • Patrick J. Biggs
  • Anthony Pita
  • Nigel French
  • Juan C. García-R

The venues where David T. S. Hayman most frequently publishes are:

  • Parasitology
  • Parasitology Research
  • Infectious Diseases of Poverty
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Best Publications

  • A comparison of bats and rodents as reservoirs of zoonotic viruses: are bats special?

    Angela D. Luis;Angela D. Luis;David T. S. Hayman;Thomas J. O'Shea;Paul M. Cryan

  • Bat flight and zoonotic viruses.

    Thomas J. O’Shea;Paul M. Cryan;Andrew A. Cunningham;Anthony R. Fooks

  • Filoviruses in Bats: Current Knowledge and Future Directions

    Kevin J. Olival;David T. S. Hayman

  • Evidence of Henipavirus Infection in West African Fruit Bats

    David T. S. Hayman;David T. S. Hayman;Richard Suu-Ire;Andrew C. Breed;Andrew C. Breed;Jennifer A. McEachern;Jennifer A. McEachern

  • A framework for the study of zoonotic disease emergence and its drivers: spillover of bat pathogens as a case study

    James L. N. Wood;Melissa Leach;Linda Waldman;Hayley MacGregor

  • Ecology of zoonotic infectious diseases in bats: current knowledge and future directions

    D. T. S. Hayman;R. A. Bowen;P. M. Cryan;Gary F. McCracken

  • The nexus between forest fragmentation in Africa and Ebola virus disease outbreaks.

    Maria Cristina Rulli;Monia Santini;David T. S. Hayman;Paolo D’Odorico

  • Ebola virus antibodies in fruit bats, Ghana, West Africa.

    David T.S. Hayman;Meng Yu;Gary Crameri;Lin-Fa Wang

  • Deciphering serology to understand the ecology of infectious diseases in wildlife.

    Amy T GIlbert;Anthony R Fooks;Anthony R Fooks;David T S Hayman;Daniel L Horton

  • Uncovering the fruit bat bushmeat commodity chain and the true extent of fruit bat hunting in Ghana, West Africa

    A.O. Kamins;O. Restif;Y. Ntiamoa-Baidu;R. Suu-Ire

  • Long-Term Survival of an Urban Fruit Bat Seropositive for Ebola and Lagos Bat Viruses

    David T. S. Hayman;David T. S. Hayman;David T. S. Hayman;Petra Emmerich;Meng Yu;Lin-Fa Wang

  • Habitat fragmentation, biodiversity loss and the risk of novel infectious disease emergence

    David A. Wilkinson;Jonathan C. Marshall;Nigel P. French;David T. S. Hayman

  • Possibility for reverse zoonotic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to free-ranging wildlife: A case study of bats.

    Kevin J. Olival;Paul M. Cryan;Brian R. Amman;Ralph S. Baric

  • Bats and lyssaviruses.

    Ashley C Banyard;David Hayman;Nicholas Johnson;Lorraine McElhinney;Lorraine McElhinney

  • Model-guided fieldwork: practical guidelines for multidisciplinary research on wildlife ecological and epidemiological dynamics

    Olivier Restif;David T S Hayman;Juliet R C Pulliam;Juliet R C Pulliam;Raina K Plowright

  • Bats as Viral Reservoirs

    David T.S. Hayman

  • Continent-wide panmixia of an African fruit bat facilitates transmission of potentially zoonotic viruses

    Alison J. Peel;Alison J. Peel;David R. Sargan;Kate S. Baker;Kate S. Baker;Kate S. Baker;David T. S. Hayman

  • Network analysis of host-virus communities in bats and rodents reveals determinants of cross-species transmission.

    Angela D. Luis;Angela D. Luis;Angela D. Luis;Thomas J. O'Shea;David T. S. Hayman;David T. S. Hayman;David T. S. Hayman;James L. N. Wood

  • Bartonella bacteria in nature: where does population variability end and a species start?

    Michael Kosoy;David T.S. Hayman;Kung-Sik Chan

  • The effect of seasonal birth pulses on pathogen persistence in wild mammal populations

    Alison J. Peel;Alison J. Peel;Alison J. Peel;J.R.C. Pulliam;A.D. Luis;R.K. Plowright

Frequent Co-Authors

James L. N. Wood
James L. N. Wood University of Cambridge
Andrew A. Cunningham
Andrew A. Cunningham Zoological Society of London
Anthony R. Fooks
Anthony R. Fooks St George's, University of London
Nigel P. French
Nigel P. French Massey University
Lin-Fa Wang
Lin-Fa Wang Duke NUS Graduate Medical School
Paul M. Cryan
Paul M. Cryan United States Geological Survey
Christopher C. Broder
Christopher C. Broder Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Gary Crameri
Gary Crameri Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness
Jackie Benschop
Jackie Benschop Massey University
Michael Kosoy
Michael Kosoy Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring biology and biochemistry can open doors to diverse online degree programs and evolving career tracks. For those interested in advancing their education within the health sciences, there are numerous flexible options. For example, online dnp programs without clinicals allow nursing professionals to earn a terminal degree without the need for on-site clinical requirements—a great benefit for busy working adults.

The realm of health and science management is also expanding. A doctorate in healthcare management can lead to leadership roles within healthcare organizations, blending science expertise with essential business skills.

If you are interested in the pharmaceutical field, online pharmacy programs offer a pathway to advanced practice, research, or academia, letting you study from anywhere at your convenience.

Additionally, careers related to human health and athletic performance are in high demand. An exercise science degree online accredited provides the training needed for roles in sports science, wellness, and rehabilitation, using cutting-edge virtual learning platforms.

Online degrees make it easier than ever to build on your biology and biochemistry background, opening pathways to specialized, impactful careers in health and science.

Best Scientists Citing David T. S. Hayman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles