World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
25967
World Ranking
9979
National Ranking
48

Emma C. Teeling publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emma C. Teeling sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 175 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Emma C. Teeling D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emma C. Teeling sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Member of the Royal Irish Academy

Overview

Emma C. Teeling is affiliated with University College Dublin in Ireland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Medicine. Within these broader fields, their work focuses on subfields such as Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Genetics, and Ecology.

Teeling's research topics encompass a range of areas including Bat Biology and Ecology Studies, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Viral Infections and Vectors, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Genetic Diversity and Population Structure, Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms, as well as Chromosomal and Genetic Variations.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Teeling include:

  • Sonja C. Vernes (25 publications)
  • Sébastien J. Puechmaille (15 publications)
  • Meike Mai (15 publications)
  • Graham M. Hughes (14 publications)
  • Michael Hiller (13 publications)

Their most common publication venues are:

  • Wellcome Open Research (15 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (13 publications)
  • Nature Communications (4 publications)
  • Molecular Ecology (3 publications)
  • Aging (3 publications)

Notable recent papers by Emma C. Teeling include:

  • "Broad host range of SARS-CoV-2 predicted by comparative and structural analysis of ACE2 in vertebrates," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Six reference-quality genomes reveal evolution of bat adaptations," 2020, Nature
  • "Evolutionary constraint and innovation across hundreds of placental mammals," 2023, Science
  • "DNA methylation predicts age and provides insight into exceptional longevity of bats," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Broad Host Range of SARS-CoV-2 Predicted by Comparative and Structural Analysis of ACE2 in Vertebrates," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Emma C. Teeling has been recognized as a Member of the Royal Irish Academy since 2016.

Best Publications

  • Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species

    Arang Rhie;Shane A. McCarthy;Shane A. McCarthy;Olivier Fedrigo;Joana Damas

  • Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics

    William J. Murphy;Eduardo Eizirik;Eduardo Eizirik;Stephen J. O'Brien;Ole Madsen

  • Impacts of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution and KPg Extinction on Mammal Diversification

    Robert W. Meredith;Jan E. Janečka;John Gatesy;Oliver A. Ryder

  • A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record.

    Emma C. Teeling;Emma C. Teeling;Mark S. Springer;Ole Madsen;Paul Bates

  • The late Miocene radiation of modern Felidae: a genetic assessment.

    Warren E. Johnson;Eduardo Eizirik;Eduardo Eizirik;Eduardo Eizirik;Jill Pecon-Slattery;Jill Pecon-Slattery;Jill Pecon-Slattery;William J. Murphy;William J. Murphy;William J. Murphy

  • Genome 10K: A Proposal to Obtain Whole-Genome Sequence for 10 000 Vertebrate Species

    David Haussler;Stephen J. O'Brien;Oliver A. Ryder;F. Keith Barker

  • Broad host range of SARS-CoV-2 predicted by comparative and structural analysis of ACE2 in vertebrates.

    Joana Damas;Graham M. Hughes;Kathleen C. Keough;Corrie A. Painter

  • The evolution of echolocation in bats

    Gareth Jones;Emma C. Teeling

  • A comparative genomics multitool for scientific discovery and conservation

    Diane P. Genereux;Aitor Serres;Joel Armstrong;Jeremy Johnson

  • Molecular evidence regarding the origin of echolocation and flight in bats.

    Emma C. Teeling;Mark Scally;Mark Scally;Diana J. Kao;Michael L. Romagnoli

  • Six reference-quality genomes reveal evolution of bat adaptations

    David Jebb;Zixia Huang;Martin Pippel;Graham M. Hughes

  • Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation

    Mark S. Springer;Emma C. Teeling;Ole Madsen;Michael J. Stanhope

  • Scientists' Warning on the Conservation of Subterranean Ecosystems

    Stefano Mammola;Pedro Cardoso;David C Culver;Louis Deharveng

  • Microbat paraphyly and the convergent evolution of a key innovation in Old World rhinolophoid microbats

    Emma C. Teeling;Ole Madsen;Ronald A. Van Den Bussche;Wilfried W. de Jong

  • How and why should we implement genomics into conservation

    Barry J. McMahon;Emma C. Teeling;Jacob Höglund

  • Ecological adaptation determines functional mammalian olfactory subgenomes

    Sara Hayden;Michaël Bekaert;Tess A. Crider;Stefano Mariani

  • Pan-European distribution of white-nose syndrome fungus (Geomyces destructans) not associated with mass mortality.

    Sébastien J. Puechmaille;Gudrun Wibbelt;Vanessa Korn;Hubert Fuller

  • Mammal madness: is the mammal tree of life not yet resolved?

    Nicole M. Foley;Mark S. Springer;Emma C. Teeling

  • The evolution of color vision in nocturnal mammals

    Huabin Zhao;Stephen J. Rossiter;Emma C. Teeling;Chanjuan Li

  • Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species

    Arang Rhie;Shane A. McCarthy;Olivier Fedrigo;Joana Damas

Frequent Co-Authors

William J. Murphy
William J. Murphy Texas A&M University
Dina K. N. Dechmann
Dina K. N. Dechmann Max Planck Society
Gareth Jones
Gareth Jones University of Bristol
Stephen J. O'Brien
Stephen J. O'Brien Nova Southeastern University
Stephen J. Rossiter
Stephen J. Rossiter Queen Mary University of London
Mark S. Springer
Mark S. Springer University of California, Riverside
Eduardo Eizirik
Eduardo Eizirik Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Eugene W. Myers
Eugene W. Myers Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics
Michael J. Stanhope
Michael J. Stanhope Cornell University
Oliver A. Ryder
Oliver A. Ryder University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to a range of rewarding careers in healthcare, research, and education. As the demand for skilled professionals grows, many students and working adults are considering flexible educational options through online programs.

Healthcare remains a popular pathway. For registered nurses, progressing with an rn to bsn program can lead to expanded responsibilities and increased earning potential. Those interested in healthcare leadership may opt for an online masters healthcare management degree to develop skills for management roles within hospitals and clinics.

Mental health also presents unique opportunities. If you’re interested in blending psychology and advanced nursing, exploring psych np programs offers a pathway to becoming a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner.

Nutrition remains central to public health and preventative medicine. You can quickly enter this field with a 2 year nutrition degree online, combining foundational science with practical application.

Exploring these online degrees can help you align your Biology or Biochemistry background with dynamic and in-demand healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Emma C. Teeling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles