World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert A. Rosenheck

Robert A. Rosenheck

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
143
Citations
82954
World Ranking
1506
National Ranking
875

Robert A. Rosenheck publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Rosenheck sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,057 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert A. Rosenheck D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Rosenheck sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 143 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert A. Rosenheck is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their research spans fields primarily in Medicine and Psychology, with significant contributions to subfields including Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry, and Mental Health.

The main topics addressed in their work cover diverse aspects of mental health and social issues. These include:

  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Rosenheck's recent publications reflect these topics and subfields, illustrating ongoing engagement with issues surrounding mental illness, substance use, and community health systems. Selected recent papers are:

  • Service delivery and community: social capital, service systems integration, and outcomes among homeless persons with severe mental illness (2020), published in PubMed
  • Opioid use disorder with chronic pain increases disease burden and service use (2021), published in Psychological Services
  • Early Discontinuation of Buprenorphine Therapy for Opioid Use Disorder Among Privately Insured Adults (2020), published in Psychiatric Services
  • Beyond Supported Housing: Correlates of Improvements in Quality of Life Among Homeless Adults with Mental Illness (2022), published in Psychiatric Quarterly
  • Twelve-month outcomes of a destigmatizing theatrical intervention in rural Uganda (2023), published in Current Psychology

Rosenheck frequently publishes in venues such as Research Square, PubMed, Psychological Services, Psychiatric Services, and Psychiatric Quarterly. This range demonstrates interdisciplinary approaches bridging clinical and public health research.

Collaborative efforts are evident with several frequent co-authors, indicating active teamwork and shared research interests. Notable frequent collaborators include:

  • Yang Jae Lee
  • Ibrahim Ssekalo
  • Scott Blackwell
  • Emery Monnig
  • Rauben Kazungu

Best Publications

  • Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Drugs in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia

    Jeffrey A. Lieberman;T. Scott Stroup;Joseph Patrick McEvoy;Joseph Patrick McEvoy;Marvin S. Swartz

  • Neurocognitive Effects of Antipsychotic Medications in Patients With Chronic Schizophrenia in the CATIE Trial

    Richard S.E. Keefe;Robert M. Bilder;Sonia M. Davis;Philip D. Harvey

  • Effectiveness of Clozapine Versus Olanzapine, Quetiapine, and Risperidone in Patients With Chronic Schizophrenia Who Did Not Respond to Prior Atypical Antipsychotic Treatment

    Joseph Patrick McEvoy;Jeffrey A. Lieberman;T. Scott Stroup;Sonia M. Davis

  • A National Study of Violent Behavior in Persons With Schizophrenia

    Jeffrey W. Swanson;Marvin S. Swartz;Richard A. Van Dorn;Eric B. Elbogen

  • Compliance With Medication Regimens for Mental and Physical Disorders

    Joyce A. Cramer;Robert Rosenheck

  • Comprehensive Versus Usual Community Care for First-Episode Psychosis: 2-Year Outcomes From the NIMH RAISE Early Treatment Program

    John M. Kane;Delbert G. Robinson;Nina R. Schooler;Kim T. Mueser

  • Association of Diabetes Mellitus With Use of Atypical Neuroleptics in the Treatment of Schizophrenia

    Michael J. Sernyak;Douglas L. Leslie;Renato D. Alarcon;Miklos F. Losonczy

  • Consensus criteria for traumatic grief: A preliminary empirical test

    Holly G. Prigerson;M. K. Shear;S. C. Jacobs;C. F. Reynolds

  • Comparison of Early Intervention Services vs Treatment as Usual for Early-Phase Psychosis: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression

    Christoph U. Correll;Britta Galling;Britta Galling;Aditya Pawar;Anastasia Krivko

  • Naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence.

    John H. Krystal;Joyce A. Cramer;William F. Krol;Gail F. Kirk

  • Dissociation and posttraumatic stress disorder in Vietnam combat veterans

    J. Douglas Bremner;Steven Southwick;Elizabeth Brett;Alan Fontana

  • Stigma as a barrier to recovery: Adverse effects of perceived stigma on social adaptation of persons diagnosed with bipolar affective disorder.

    Deborah A. Perlick;Robert A. Rosenheck;John F. Clarkin;Jo Anne Sirey

  • A comparison of clozapine and haloperidol in hospitalized patients with refractory schizophrenia. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Clozapine in Refractory Schizophrenia.

    Robert Rosenheck;Joyce Cramer;Weichun Xu;Jonathan Thomas

  • Quality of medical care and excess mortality in older patients with mental disorders.

    Benjamin G. Druss;W. David Bradford;Robert A. Rosenheck;Martha J. Radford

  • Mental Disorders and Use of Cardiovascular Procedures After Myocardial Infarction

    Benjamin G. Druss;David W. Bradford;Robert A. Rosenheck;Martha J. Radford

  • Barriers to Employment for People With Schizophrenia

    Robert Rosenheck;Douglas Leslie;Richard Keefe;Joseph McEvoy

  • Association Between Use of Unconventional Therapies and Conventional Medical Services

    Benjamin G. Druss;Robert A. Rosenheck

  • Baseline Neurocognitive Deficits in the CATIE Schizophrenia Trial

    Richard S.E. Keefe;Robert M. Bilder;Philip D. Harvey;Sonia M. Davis

  • Effectiveness of Olanzapine, Quetiapine, Risperidone, and Ziprasidone in Patients With Chronic Schizophrenia Following Discontinuation of a Previous Atypical Antipsychotic

    T. Scott Stroup;Jeffrey A. Lieberman;Joseph P. McEvoy;Marvin S. Swartz

  • Acculturation and the lifetime risk of psychiatric and substance use disorders among Hispanics.

    Alexander N. Ortega;Robert Rosenheck;Margarita Alegría;Rani A. Desai

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack Tsai
Jack Tsai The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Alan Fontana
Alan Fontana Yale University
Marvin S. Swartz
Marvin S. Swartz Duke University
Jeffrey A. Lieberman
Jeffrey A. Lieberman Columbia University
Joseph P. McEvoy
Joseph P. McEvoy Augusta University
Joyce A. Cramer
Joyce A. Cramer Yale University
John H. Krystal
John H. Krystal Yale University
Ilan Harpaz-Rotem
Ilan Harpaz-Rotem Yale University
Richard S.E. Keefe
Richard S.E. Keefe Duke University
Dennis S. Charney
Dennis S. Charney Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education pathways is a practical option for students aiming to enter healthcare fields. For registered nurses seeking further qualifications, finding the cheapest rn to bsn program online can provide career advancement while minimizing financial burden. These programs often offer flexible schedules and credit transfers, making them accessible to working professionals.

Those who hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree but wish to pivot into nursing can look for non nursing bachelor's to msn online programs. These accelerated pathways enable a quicker transition into advanced nursing roles, even without prior nursing education.

If your goal is to enter the nursing field with fewer barriers, researching the easiest nursing programs to get into can help. These schools are known for having more flexible admissions criteria, which can be a crucial advantage for many applicants.

Alternatively, careers in healthcare administration—such as billing and coding—are growing in demand. Consider enrolling in medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid for an accessible, employment-oriented alternative to traditional clinical degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Robert A. Rosenheck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles