World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9724 9097 462 455 65 7423
Neuroscience 35 9122 8425 764 726 68 7449

Ute Strehl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ute Strehl between 1996 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ute Strehl published across 26 years, from 1996 to 2021, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2011. 5 of the 68 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2011. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 6 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications
1996 2021

68 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ute Strehl: publications per year, 1996 to 2021
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 3
2000 2
2001 0
2002 3
2003 1
2004 3
2005 2
2006 2
2007 3
2008 3
2009 3
2010 1
2011 6
2012 1
2013 4
2014 5
2015 6
2016 4
2017 3
2018 1
2019 2
2020 2
2021 3
Total 68
Download as CSV

Ute Strehl publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute Strehl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 68–77 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 68 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323 68
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Ute Strehl D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute Strehl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296 35
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Ute Strehl is a researcher affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their academic work primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and medicine, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their research contributions address a variety of topics, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Among recent publications, Ute Strehl has contributed to studies such as:

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, Brain
  • A randomized-controlled neurofeedback trial in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Can neurophysiological markers of anticipation and attention predict ADHD severity and neurofeedback outcomes?, 2021, Biological Psychology
  • Balancing the brain of offenders with psychopathy? Resting state EEG and electrodermal activity after a pilot study of brain self-regulation training, 2021, PLoS ONE

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Ute Strehl include Lilian Konicar, Ann-Christine Ehlis, Daniel Brandeis, Niels Birbaumer, and Beatrix Barth. Their work has been published in journals such as Brain, Scientific Reports, Biological Psychology, and PLoS ONE.

Best Publications

  • Efficacy of Neurofeedback Treatment in ADHD: The Effects on Inattention, Impulsivity and Hyperactivity: A Meta-Analysis

    Martijn Arns;Sabine de Ridder;Ute Strehl;Marinus Breteler

  • Psychobiology of altered states of Consciousness

    Dieter Vaitl;Niels Birbaumer;John Gruzelier;Graham A. Jamieson

  • Evaluation of neurofeedback in ADHD: the long and winding road

    Martijn Arns;Hartmut Heinrich;Ute Strehl

  • Self-regulation of slow cortical potentials: a new treatment for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    Ute Strehl;Ulrike Leins;Gabriella Goth;Christoph Klinger

  • Annotation: Neurofeedback – train your brain to train behaviour

    Hartmut Heinrich;Hartmut Heinrich;Holger Gevensleben;Ute Strehl

  • Psychobiology of altered states of consciousness.

    Dieter Vaitl;Niels Birbaumer;John Gruzelier;Graham A. Jamieson

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist)

    Tomas Ros;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Vadim Zotev;Kymberly D Young

  • Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Jessica Van Doren;Martijn Arns;Hartmut Heinrich;Madelon A. Vollebregt

  • Meta-analysis of EEG biofeedback in treating epilepsy.

    Gabriel Tan;John Thornby;D. Corydon Hammond;Ute Strehl

  • [Neurofeedback for children with ADHD: a comparison of SCP- and theta/beta-protocols].

    Ulrike Leins;Gabriella Goth;Thilo Hinterberger;Christoph Klinger

  • Modification of slow cortical potentials in patients with refractory epilepsy: a controlled outcome study.

    B. Kotchoubey;U. Strehl;C. Uhlmann;S. Holzapfel

  • Neurofeedback and Basic Learning Theory: Implications for Research and Practice

    Leslie H. Sherlin;Martijn Arns;Joel Lubar;Hartmut Heinrich

  • What learning theories can teach us in designing neurofeedback treatments.

    Ute Strehl

  • Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) neurofeedback as a treatment for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-a pilot study.

    Anna-Maria Marx;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Adrian Furdea;Martin Holtmann

  • Neurofeedback of Slow Cortical Potentials in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Trial Controlling for Unspecific Effects.

    Ute Strehl;Pascal Aggensteiner;Daniel Wachtlin;Daniel Wachtlin;Daniel Brandeis

  • Brain areas activated in fMRI during self-regulation of slow cortical potentials (SCPs).

    Thilo Hinterberger;Ralf Veit;Ute Strehl;Tracy Trevorrow

  • Negative potential shifts and the prediction of the outcome of neurofeedback therapy in epilepsy

    B Kotchoubey;U Strehl;S Holzapfel;V Blankenhorn

  • Neurofeedback of slow cortical potentials as a treatment for adults with Attention Deficit-/Hyperactivity Disorder.

    Kerstin Mayer;Friederike Blume;Sarah Nicole Wyckoff;Luisa Leonie Brokmeier

  • Self-regulation of slow cortical potentials in epilepsy : a retrial with analysis of influencing factors

    B. Kotchoubey;D. Schneider;H. Schleichert;U. Strehl

  • Can humans perceive their brain states

    Boris Kotchoubey;Andrea Kübler;Ute Strehl;Herta Flor

Frequent Co-Authors

Niels Birbaumer
Niels Birbaumer University of Tübingen
Boris Kotchoubey
Boris Kotchoubey University of Tübingen
Martijn Arns
Martijn Arns Brainclinics
Ann-Christine Ehlis
Ann-Christine Ehlis University of Tübingen
Hartmut Heinrich
Hartmut Heinrich University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Andreas J. Fallgatter
Andreas J. Fallgatter University of Tübingen
Ralf Veit
Ralf Veit University of Tübingen
Daniel Brandeis
Daniel Brandeis University of Zurich
Aribert Rothenberger
Aribert Rothenberger University of Göttingen
Christine M. Freitag
Christine M. Freitag Goethe University Frankfurt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to various online degree options and professional paths. Students often consider degrees in psychology, social work, counseling, or marriage and family therapy to complement or expand their neuroscience studies.

For those concerned about tuition, there are ways to manage expenses by researching psychology degree cost and finding affordable online programs. If you’re interested in a fast-track to advanced practice, some 1 year msw programs online no bsw allow students from a variety of undergraduate backgrounds to earn a Master of Social Work quickly.

Aspiring psychologists can also pursue online psyd programs, which provide clinical training for those aiming for licensure. For those drawn to family and marriage therapy, mft programs offer flexible and accelerated paths to licensure and practice.

By considering these related online degrees and career pathways, neuroscience students can align their studies with specific professional goals and create more opportunities in mental health, research, and clinical settings.

Best Scientists Citing Ute Strehl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles