World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
11541
World Ranking
4692
National Ranking
394

Klaus Mathiak publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Mathiak sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 236 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Klaus Mathiak D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Mathiak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Klaus Mathiak is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany. Their research spans several interconnected fields including neuroscience, medicine, and psychology, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental psychology subfields.

The main areas of study in Klaus Mathiak's work include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine
  • Psychology

The research delves into specialized subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

The scientist has contributed to numerous topics in the neuroscientific and psychological domains, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Klaus Mathiak has authored multiple papers, with notable recent publications such as:

  • Classification of Heart Sounds Using Convolutional Neural Network, 2020, Applied Sciences
  • Common and separable neural alterations in substance use disorders: A coordinate-based meta-analyses of functional neuroimaging studies in humans, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • End-to-end sleep staging using convolutional neural network in raw single-channel EEG, 2020, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
  • Common neurofunctional dysregulations characterize obsessive-compulsive, substance use, and gaming disorders-An activation likelihood meta-analysis of functional imaging studies, 2021, Addiction Biology
  • Rt-fMRI neurofeedback-guided cognitive reappraisal training modulates amygdala responsivity in posttraumatic stress disorder, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • International Journal of Neural Systems
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Klaus Mathiak's work, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Jana Zweerings
  • Micha Keller
  • Fengyu Cong
  • Arnim Johannes Gaebler
  • Benjamin Becker

Best Publications

  • Principles of a brain-computer interface (BCI) based on real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)

    N. Weiskopf;K. Mathiak;S.W. Bock;F. Scharnowski

  • Physiological self-regulation of regional brain activity using real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): methodology and exemplary data.

    Nikolaus Weiskopf;Ralf Veit;Michael Erb;Klaus Mathiak

  • Enhancement of BOLD‐contrast sensitivity by single‐shot multi‐echo functional MR imaging

    Stefan Posse;Stefan Wiese;Daniel Gembris;Klaus Mathiak

  • The contribution of the cerebellum to speech production and speech perception: clinical and functional imaging data.

    Hermann Ackermann;Klaus Mathiak;Axel Riecker

  • Self-regulation of local brain activity using real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

    Nikolaus Weiskopf;Frank Scharnowski;Frank Scharnowski;Frank Scharnowski;Ralf Veit;Rainer Goebel

  • Does Playing Violent Video Games Induce Aggression? Empirical Evidence of a Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Rene Weber;Ute Ritterfeld;Klaus Mathiak

  • fMRI reveals two distinct cerebral networks subserving speech motor control.

    A. Riecker;K. Mathiak;D. Wildgruber;M. Erb

  • Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging : methods and applications

    Nikolaus Weiskopf;Nikolaus Weiskopf;Ranganatha Sitaram;Oliver Josephs;Ralf Veit;Ralf Veit

  • Toward brain correlates of natural behavior: fMRI during violent video games.

    Klaus Mathiak;René Weber

  • Neural contributions to flow experience during video game playing

    Martin Klasen;René Weber;Tilo T. J. Kircher;Krystyna A. Mathiak

  • Parametric analysis of rate-dependent hemodynamic response functions of cortical and subcortical brain structures during auditorily cued finger tapping: a fMRI study

    Axel Riecker;Dirk Wildgruber;Klaus Mathiak;Wolfgang Grodd

  • Brain networks underlying mental imagery of auditory and visual information

    Mikhail Zvyagintsev;Benjamin Clemens;Natalya Chechko;Krystyna A. Mathiak

  • Cerebellum and Speech Perception: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Klaus Mathiak;Ingo Hertrich;Wolfgang Grodd;Hermann Ackermann

  • Single-shot compensation of image distortions and BOLD contrast optimization using multi-echo EPI for real-time fMRI.

    Nikolaus Weiskopf;Nikolaus Weiskopf;Uwe Klose;Niels Birbaumer;Niels Birbaumer;Klaus Mathiak

  • Multisensory emotions: perception, combination and underlying neural processes

    Martin Klasen;Yu-Han Chen;Klaus Mathiak

  • Supramodal Representation of Emotions

    Martin Klasen;Charles A. Kenworthy;Krystyna A. Mathiak;Tilo T. J. Kircher

  • Antidepressants in the treatment of depression/depressive symptoms in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Zacharias G Laoutidis;Zacharias G Laoutidis;Klaus Mathiak;Klaus Mathiak

  • Mismatch negativity responses in schizophrenia: a combined fMRI and whole-head MEG study.

    Thilo T. J. Kircher;Alexander Rapp;Wolfgang Grodd;Gerhard Buchkremer

  • Correction: Recognition Profile of Emotions in Natural and Virtual Faces

    Miriam Dyck;Maren Winbeck;Susanne Leiberg;Yuhan Chen

  • Recognition Profile of Emotions in Natural and Virtual Faces

    Miriam Silke Dyck;Miriam Silke Dyck;Maren Winbeck;Susanne Leiberg;Yuhan Chen

  • Discrimination of temporal information at the cerebellum: functional magnetic resonance imaging of nonverbal auditory memory.

    Klaus Mathiak;Ingo Hertrich;Wolfgang Grodd;Hermann Ackermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Hermann Ackermann
Hermann Ackermann University of Tübingen
Ingo Hertrich
Ingo Hertrich University of Tübingen
Werner Lutzenberger
Werner Lutzenberger University of Tübingen
Nikolaus Weiskopf
Nikolaus Weiskopf Max Planck Society
Wolfgang Grodd
Wolfgang Grodd Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Niels Birbaumer
Niels Birbaumer University of Tübingen
Frank Schneider
Frank Schneider Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Ute Habel
Ute Habel RWTH Aachen University
Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel Maastricht University
Tilo Kircher
Tilo Kircher Philipp University of Marburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Mathiak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles