World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
111
Citations
38548
World Ranking
5393
National Ranking
2910

James E. Lock publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Lock sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 409 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James E. Lock D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Lock sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James E. Lock is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in the field of psychology. The focus of their work covers several subfields including clinical psychology, general health professions, psychiatry and mental health, speech and hearing, and surgery.

Their research spans multiple main topics such as eating disorders and behaviors, psychological treatments and assessments, mindfulness and compassion interventions, healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, child nutrition and feeding issues, adolescent and pediatric healthcare, and esophageal and gastrointestinal pathology.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with James E. Lock include Paul Mansell, Katherine V. Sparks, Jason Wright, Leanne Roe, and Shane Carrington.

The scientist's publications have appeared in various venues, including:

  • Journal of Applied Sport Psychology
  • Psychiatric News
  • Family Process
  • Endoscopy
  • Cancer Research

Recent papers authored or coauthored by James E. Lock include:

  • "Mindset: performing under pressure" - a multimodal cognitive-behavioural intervention to enhance the well-being and performance of young athletes, 2023, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology
  • Special Report: Youth With Eating Disorders-Time Is of the Essence in Achieving Remission, 2023, Psychiatric News
  • Issue Information, 2020, Family Process
  • Palliative EUS-guided gastroenterostomy in malignant gastric outlet obstruction - a 2 years single center experience, 2024, Endoscopy
  • Abstract 2477: Accurate, high-throughput spatial profiling of whole slide samples with the NeoLYTX pipeline, 2025, Cancer Research

Best Publications

  • Long-Term Survival, Modes of Death, and Predictors of Mortality in Patients With Fontan Surgery

    Paul Khairy;Susan M. Fernandes;John E. Mayer;John K. Triedman

  • Factors associated with impaired clinical status in long-term survivors of tetralogy of Fallot repair evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging

    Tal Geva;Bryan M Sandweiss;Kimberlee Gauvreau;James E Lock

  • Short- and Medium-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Placement in the Expanded Multicenter US Melody Valve Trial

    Doff B. McElhinney;William E. Hellenbrand;Evan M. Zahn;Thomas K. Jones

  • Use of endovascular stents in congenital heart disease.

    M P O'Laughlin;S B Perry;J E Lock;C E Mullins

  • Fontan operation in five hundred consecutive patients: Factors influencing early and late outcome ☆ ☆☆ ★ ★★ ♢ ♢♢ ♦

    Thomas L. Gentles;John E. Mayer;Kimberlee Gauvreau;Jane W. Newburger

  • Transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects.

    J E Lock;P C Block;R G McKay;D S Baim

  • Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale after presumed paradoxical embolism.

    N D Bridges;W Hellenbrand;L Latson;J Filiano

  • Baffle fenestration with subsequent transcatheter closure. Modification of the Fontan operation for patients at increased risk.

    N D Bridges;J E Lock;A R Castaneda

  • Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

    Jeffrey A. Feinstein;Samuel Z. Goldhaber;James E. Lock;Susan M. Ferndandes

  • Percutaneous catheter commissurotomy in rheumatic mitral stenosis

    James E. Lock;M. Khalilullah;Savitri Shrivastava;V. Bahl

  • Management of coronary artery fistulae: Patient selection and results of transcatheter closure

    Laurie R. Armsby;John F. Keane;Megan C. Sherwood;Joseph M. Forbess

  • Ventricular Size and Function Assessed by Cardiac MRI Predict Major Adverse Clinical Outcomes Late After Tetralogy of Fallot Repair

    A L Knauth;K Gauvreau;A J Powell;M J Landzberg

  • Balloon Dilation of Severe Aortic Stenosis in the Fetus Potential for Prevention of Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: Candidate Selection, Technique, and Results of Successful Intervention

    Wayne Tworetzky;Louise Wilkins-Haug;Russell W. Jennings;Mary E. van der Velde

  • Hepatic venous blood and the development of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations in congenital heart disease

    Deepak Srivastava;Tamar Preminger;James E. Lock;Valerie Mandell

  • Fetal aortic valve stenosis and the evolution of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: patient selection for fetal intervention

    Kaarin Mäkikallio;Doff B. McElhinney;Jami C. Levine;Gerald R. Marx

  • Implantation and intermediate-term follow-up of stents in congenital heart disease.

    M P O'Laughlin;M C Slack;R G Grifka;S B Perry

  • Transcatheter ablation of ectopic atrial tachycardia in young patients using radiofrequency current.

    E P Walsh;J P Saul;J E Hulse;L A Rhodes

  • Balloon dilation angioplasty of aortic coarctations in infants and children.

    J. E. Lock;John L Bass;K. Amplatz;B. P. Fuhrman

  • Implantation of the Melody Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve in Patients With a Dysfunctional Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Conduit Early Results From the U.S. Clinical Trial

    Evan M. Zahn;William E. Hellenbrand;James E. Lock;Doff B. McElhinney

  • In-Hospital Mortality for Surgical Repair of Congenital Heart Defects: Preliminary Observations of Variation by Hospital Caseload

    Kathy J. Jenkins;Jane W. Newburger;James E. Lock;Roger B. Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Le Grange
Daniel Le Grange University of California, San Francisco
John F. Keane
John F. Keane Boston Children's Hospital
Doff B. McElhinney
Doff B. McElhinney Stanford University
John E. Mayer
John E. Mayer Boston Children's Hospital
Kimberlee Gauvreau
Kimberlee Gauvreau Boston Children's Hospital
Pedro J. del Nido
Pedro J. del Nido Boston Children's Hospital
Steven D. Colan
Steven D. Colan Boston Children's Hospital
Carol B. Benson
Carol B. Benson Brigham and Women's Hospital
Aldo R. Castaneda
Aldo R. Castaneda Boston Children's Hospital
Michael J. Landzberg
Michael J. Landzberg Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens up a variety of related pathways, especially for those interested in nursing and advanced healthcare roles. Many students are now turning to online programs for flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

For those seeking to become registered nurses without a large financial burden, you can find affordable online nursing programs that offer flexible learning schedules and accessible tuition.

If you’re already a registered nurse aiming to advance your credentials, the cheapest online bsn programs are designed to help you earn your Bachelor of Science in Nursing entirely online, often at a lower cost than traditional in-person options.

Those pursuing the highest levels of nursing practice may consider the cheapest dnp programs online, which offer advanced training for leadership and specialized clinical roles.

Additionally, career changers with a non-nursing background can accelerate their entry into the field through direct entry msn programs online, which allow you to earn a master’s degree in nursing quickly and efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Lock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles