World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
35300
World Ranking
7711
National Ranking
4010

Pedro J. del Nido publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro J. del Nido sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 653 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Pedro J. del Nido D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro J. del Nido sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pedro J. del Nido is affiliated with Boston Children's Hospital in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist has a substantial publication record in topics related to congenital and structural heart conditions, reflecting a focus on cardiovascular disease mechanisms and interventions. Key research areas include:

  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Recent papers demonstrate ongoing work in mitochondrial transplantation and cardiac surgery techniques. Significant recent publications include:

  • Autologous mitochondrial transplantation for cardiogenic shock in pediatric patients following ischemia-reperfusion injury (2020), Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Mitochondrial transplantation by intra-arterial injection for acute kidney injury (2020), American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
  • Congenital aortic and truncal valve reconstruction using the Ozaki technique: Short-term clinical results (2020), Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Mitochondrial transplantation for myocardial protection in ex-situ-perfused hearts donated after circulatory death (2020), The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • Autogenous mitochondria transplantation for treatment of right heart failure (2020), Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Frequent co-authors working closely with Pedro J. del Nido include:

  • Sitaram M. Emani
  • Meena Nathan
  • Kimberlee Gauvreau
  • Christopher W. Baird
  • David M. Hoganson

The venues where their work is most commonly published are:

  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Circulation
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon

Best Publications

  • ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: Executive summary - A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease)

    Carole A. Warnes;Roberta G. Williams;Thomas M. Bashore;John S. Child

  • ACC/AHA 2008 Guidelines for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

    Carole A. Warnes;Roberta G. Williams;Thomas M. Bashore;John S. Child

  • The influence of hemodilution on outcome after hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass: results of a randomized trial in infants.

    Richard A Jonas;Richard A Jonas;David Wypij;David Wypij;Stephen J Roth;David C Bellinger;David C Bellinger

  • Long-term results of the lateral tunnel Fontan operation

    Christof Stamm;Ingeborg Friehs;John E. Mayer;David Zurakowski

  • A Blood-Resistant Surgical Glue for Minimally Invasive Repair of Vessels and Heart Defects

    Nora Lang;Maria J. Pereira;Maria J. Pereira;Yuhan Lee;Ingeborg Friehs

  • Long-term results after early primary repair of tetralogy of Fallot.

    Emile A. Bacha;Albertus M. Scheule;David Zurakowski;Lars C. Erickson

  • Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot in Neonates and Young Infants

    F A Pigula;P N Khalil;J E Mayer;P J del Nido

  • Long-term predictors of aortic root dilation and aortic regurgitation after arterial switch operation.

    Marcy L. Schwartz;Kimberlee Gauvreau;Pedro del Nido;John E. Mayer

  • Perioperative effects of alpha-stat versus ph-stat strategies for deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in infants ☆ ☆☆ ★ ★★ ♢

    Adre J. du Plessis;Richard A. Jonas;David Wypij;Paul R. Hickey

  • Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection: An Analysis of Current Management Strategies in a Single Institution

    Camille Louisa Hancock Friesen;David Zurakowski;Ravi R. Thiagarajan;Joseph M Forbess

  • Twenty-five-year experience with rastelli repair for transposition of the great arteries.

    Christian Kreutzer;Julie De Vive;Guido Oppido;Jacqueline Kreutzer

  • Autologous mitochondrial transplantation for dysfunction after ischemia-reperfusion injury

    Sitaram M. Emani;Breanna L. Piekarski;David Harrild;Pedro J. del Nido

  • Mechanical circulatory support in children with cardiac disease.

    Brian W. Duncan;Viktor Hraska;Richard A. Jonas;David L. Wessel

  • Use of rapid-deployment extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the resuscitation of pediatric patients with heart disease after cardiac arrest

    Brian W. Duncan;Andra E. Ibrahim;Viktor Hraska;Pedro del Nido

  • Randomized Trial of Pulmonary Valve Replacement With and Without Right Ventricular Remodeling Surgery

    Tal Geva;Kimberlee Gauvreau;Andrew J. Powell;Frank Cecchin

  • Fetal Aortic Valvuloplasty for Evolving Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Postnatal Outcomes of the First 100 Patients

    Lindsay R. Freud;Doff B. McElhinney;Audrey C. Marshall;Gerald R. Marx

  • The effect of hematocrit during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in infant heart surgery: results from the combined Boston hematocrit trials.

    David Wypij;David Wypij;Richard A. Jonas;Richard A. Jonas;David C. Bellinger;David C. Bellinger;Pedro J. Del Nido;Pedro J. Del Nido

  • Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Routine Cardiac Catheterization Before Bidirectional Glenn Anastomosis in Infants With Functional Single Ventricle A Prospective Randomized Trial

    David W. Brown;Kimberlee Gauvreau;Andrew J. Powell;Peter Lang

  • Cardiac Tumors and Associated Arrhythmias in Pediatric Patients, With Observations on Surgical Therapy for Ventricular Tachycardia

    Christina Y. Miyake;Pedro J. Del Nido;Mark E. Alexander;Frank Cecchin

  • History and use of del Nido cardioplegia solution at Boston Children's Hospital.

    Gregory S. Matte;Pedro J. del Nido

Frequent Co-Authors

John E. Mayer
John E. Mayer Boston Children's Hospital
Tal Geva
Tal Geva Boston Children's Hospital
Kimberlee Gauvreau
Kimberlee Gauvreau Boston Children's Hospital
David Zurakowski
David Zurakowski Boston Children's Hospital
Peter C. Laussen
Peter C. Laussen Boston Children's Hospital
Robert D. Howe
Robert D. Howe Harvard University
Steven D. Colan
Steven D. Colan Boston Children's Hospital
Ravi R. Thiagarajan
Ravi R. Thiagarajan Boston Children's Hospital
James E. Lock
James E. Lock Stanford University
Doff B. McElhinney
Doff B. McElhinney Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the diverse online degree options related to medicine can open new career pathways for aspiring healthcare professionals. Many students look for the easiest bsn program to get into so they can quickly launch their nursing careers without facing overly competitive admission processes.

For current nurses, advancing qualifications is a top priority. Programs such as rn to bsn online cost are a key concern, as affordability and flexibility help working nurses build their credentials while balancing work and school.

If you're interested in advanced roles or academia, consider the phd nursing education online programs that allow you to study at your own pace from anywhere. Meanwhile, those coming from non-nursing backgrounds may be interested in online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses, which provide a pathway to earn a master's degree and enter the field more quickly.

Online programs provide accessible, flexible options for those aiming to progress in healthcare or transition to a medical career, helping you achieve your goals wherever you are.

Best Scientists Citing Pedro J. del Nido

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles