World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
112
Citations
59104
World Ranking
5071
National Ranking
497

Michael A. Gatzoulis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Gatzoulis sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 744 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael A. Gatzoulis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Gatzoulis sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael A. Gatzoulis is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, with a significant emphasis on congenital heart disease and related conditions.

The scientist's work spans several subfields within medicine, including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering

Main topics covered in their publications elaborate on diverse aspects of cardiovascular health and disease management:

  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Coronary Artery Anomalies

Recent papers associated with the scientist reflect a range of contributions to cardiovascular and pulmonary medicine, including:

  • "Definition, classification and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension" (2024), European Respiratory Journal
  • "Atrial septal defect in adulthood: a new paradigm for congenital heart disease" (2021), European Heart Journal
  • "Lifespan Perspective on Congenital Heart Disease Research" (2021), Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Predicting Survival in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot" (2021), JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • "Risk stratification and management of women with cardiomyopathy/heart failure planning pregnancy or presenting during/after pregnancy: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Study Group on Peripartum Cardiomyopathy" (2021), European Journal of Heart Failure

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with this researcher include:

  • Gerhard-Paul Diller
  • Margarita Brida
  • Konstantinos Dimopoulos
  • Aleksander Kempny
  • Sonya V. Babu-Narayan

Publications have appeared mainly in the following venues, indicating focal points for disseminating their work:

  • International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease
  • European Heart Journal
  • International Journal of Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

The volume of publications demonstrates a specialized interest in congenital heart disease, with a substantial number of studies dedicated to cardiac anomalies, treatment strategies, and related epidemiological aspects.

Best Publications

  • Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension

    Gerald Simonneau;Michael A Gatzoulis;Ian Adatia;David Celermajer

  • Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension.

    Gérald Simonneau;Gérald Simonneau;David Montani;David Montani;David S. Celermajer;Christopher P. Denton

  • ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010).

    Helmut Baumgartner;Philipp Bonhoeffer;Natasja M. S. De Groot;Fokko de Haan

  • Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a multicentre study

    Michael A Gatzoulis;Michael A Gatzoulis;Seshadri Balaji;Steven A Webber;Samuel C Siu

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease.

    Helmut Baumgartner;Julie De Backer;Sonya V Babu-Narayan;Werner Budts

  • Exercise intolerance in adult congenital heart disease: comparative severity, correlates, and prognostic implication.

    Gerhard Paul Diller;Konstantinos Dimopoulos;Darlington Okonko;Wei Li

  • Mechanoelectrical interaction in tetralogy of Fallot. QRS prolongation relates to right ventricular size and predicts malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death.

    Michael A. Gatzoulis;Jan A. Till;Jane Somerville;Andrew N. Redington

  • Bosentan therapy in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

    Nazzareno Galiè;Maurice Beghetti;Michael A. Gatzoulis;John Granton

  • Right ventricular function in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot assessed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: detrimental role of right ventricular outflow aneurysms or akinesia and adverse right-to-left ventricular interaction.

    Periklis A. Davlouros;Philip J. Kilner;Tim S. Hornung;Wei Li

  • Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Tetralogy of Fallot

    Paul Khairy;Louise Harris;Michael J. Landzberg;Sangeetha Viswanathan

  • Has there been any progress made on pregnancy outcomes among women with pulmonary arterial hypertension

    Elisabeth Bédard;Konstantinos Dimopoulos;Michael A Gatzoulis

  • Atrial Arrhythmia After Surgical Closure of Atrial Septal Defects in Adults

    Michael A. Gatzoulis;Marc A. Freeman;Samuel C. Siu;Gary D. Webb

  • Impact of Pulmonary Valve Replacement on Arrhythmia Propensity Late After Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot

    J. Therrien;S. C. Siu;L. Harris;A. Dore

  • Evaluation and Management of the Child and Adult With Fontan Circulation: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

    Jack Rychik;Andrew M. Atz;David S. Celermajer;Barbara J. Deal

  • Ventricular Fibrosis Suggested by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Adults With Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot and Its Relationship to Adverse Markers of Clinical Outcome

    Sonya V. Babu-Narayan;Philip J. Kilner;Wei Li;James C. Moon

  • Changing demographics, epidemiology, and survival of incident pulmonary arterial hypertension: results from the pulmonary hypertension registry of the United Kingdom and Ireland.

    Y Ling;MK Johnson;DG Kiely;R Condliffe

  • Clinical Features of 78 Adults With 22q11 Deletion Syndrome

    Anne S. Bassett;Eva W.C. Chow;Eva W.C. Chow;Janice Husted;Janice Husted;Rosanna Weksberg

  • Value of Programmed Ventricular Stimulation After Tetralogy of Fallot Repair A Multicenter Study

    Paul Khairy;Michael J. Landzberg;Michael A. Gatzoulis;Hugues Lucron

  • Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot

    Michael A. Gatzoulis;Seshadri Balaji;Steven A. Webber;Samuel C. Siu

  • ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010)

    Helmut Baumgartner;Philipp Bonhoeffer;Natasja M.S. de Groo;Fokko de Haan

Frequent Co-Authors

Dudley J. Pennell
Dudley J. Pennell National Institutes of Health
Helmut Baumgartner
Helmut Baumgartner University Hospital of Münster
Barbara J.M. Mulder
Barbara J.M. Mulder University of Amsterdam
Siew Yen Ho
Siew Yen Ho Imperial College London
Darrel P. Francis
Darrel P. Francis Imperial College London
Michael J. Landzberg
Michael J. Landzberg Brigham and Women's Hospital
Paul A. Corris
Paul A. Corris Newcastle University
Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink
Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink Erasmus University Rotterdam
Nazzareno Galiè
Nazzareno Galiè University of Bologna
David S. Celermajer
David S. Celermajer Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers beyond a traditional MD program, there are many flexible pathways to consider. Nursing is a popular option, with online choices available for both aspiring and experienced professionals. Some schools are recognized for being nursing schools with high acceptance rates, offering a greater chance of admission for applicants.

If you hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, you might explore direct entry np programs for non nurses online. These programs allow you to transition into advanced nursing roles, such as nurse practitioner, often in an accelerated format.

Entrance exam requirements can also vary. For added convenience, some institutions are classified as a nursing school that does not require teas test, simplifying the application process.

Alternatively, beginning a career in medical administration can be accessible through accredited programs with flexible schedules. There are options for financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes, helping to minimize costs while launching your healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Michael A. Gatzoulis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles