World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
74
Citations
18009
World Ranking
5650
National Ranking
439

Leonard W. Seymour publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard W. Seymour sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 204 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Leonard W. Seymour D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard W. Seymour sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leonard W. Seymour is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields with a strong focus on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to cancer and immunotherapy studies.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Within these domains, Leonard's research engages with several specialized subfields such as:

  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Immunology
  • Biotechnology

The prominent topics that feature across Leonard W. Seymour's publications involve:

  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Cancer Research and Treatments
  • Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

Leonard has contributed to a substantial number of articles, frequently publishing in these scientific venues:

  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • Cancers
  • British Journal of Cancer
  • Cancer Immunology Research
  • Nature Biotechnology

Some of the recent and notable publications include:

  • Peptide-TLR-7/8a conjugate vaccines chemically programmed for nanoparticle self-assembly enhance CD8 T-cell immunity to tumor antigens, 2020, Nature Biotechnology
  • Promises and challenges of adoptive T-cell therapies for solid tumours, 2021, British Journal of Cancer
  • Deregulation of HLA-I in cancer and its central importance for immunotherapy, 2021, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • Interfaces between cellular responses to DNA damage and cancer immunotherapy, 2021, Genes & Development
  • Beyond cancer cells: Targeting the tumor microenvironment with gene therapy and armed oncolytic virus, 2021, Molecular Therapy

In their collaborative efforts, Leonard frequently coauthors papers with:

  • Richard Baugh
  • Hena Khalique
  • Sally Frost
  • Kerry Fisher
  • Peter Kok-Ting Wan

Best Publications

  • Effect of molecular weight (Mw) of N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymers on body distribution and rate of excretion after subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, and intravenous administration to rats.

    L. W. Seymour;R. Duncan;J. Strohalm;Jindrich Kopecek

  • Factors affecting blood clearance and in vivo distribution of polyelectrolyte complexes for gene delivery.

    P R Dash;M L Read;L B Barrett;M A Wolfert

  • Hepatic Drug Targeting: Phase I Evaluation of Polymer-Bound Doxorubicin

    Leonard W. Seymour;David R. Ferry;David Anderson;Stuart Hesslewood

  • In vivo characterization of the physicochemical properties of polymer-linked TLR agonists that enhance vaccine immunogenicity

    Geoffrey M Lynn;Geoffrey M Lynn;Richard Laga;Richard Laga;Patricia A Darrah;Andrew S Ishizuka

  • Polymer-coated adenovirus permits efficient retargeting and evades neutralising antibodies

    K D Fisher;Y Stallwood;N K Green;K Ulbrich

  • Novel vectors for gene delivery formed by self-assembly of DNA with poly(L-lysine) grafted with hydrophilic polymers.

    Veska Toncheva;Margreet A Wolfert;Philip R Dash;David Oupicky

  • Importance of lateral and steric stabilization of polyelectrolyte gene delivery vectors for extended systemic circulation

    David Oupicky;Manfred Ogris;Kenneth A. Howard;Philip R. Dash

  • Peptide-mediated RNA delivery: a novel approach for enhanced transfection of primary and post-mitotic cells

    Thierry Bettinger;Robert C. Carlisle;Martin L. Read;Manfred Ogris

  • Key issues in non-viral gene delivery1PII of original article: S0169-409X(98)00048-9. The article was originally published in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 34 (1998) 3–19.1

    Colin W Pouton;Leonard W Seymour

  • Polyelectrolyte vectors for gene delivery: influence of cationic polymer on biophysical properties of complexes formed with DNA.

    Margreet A. Wolfert;Philip R. Dash;Ola Nazarova;David Oupicky

  • Poly(ethylene glycol) multiblock copolymer as a carrier of anti-cancer drug doxorubicin.

    Michal Pechar;Karel Ulbrich;Vladimír Šubr;Leonard W. Seymour

  • Peptide–TLR-7/8a conjugate vaccines chemically programmed for nanoparticle self-assembly enhance CD8 T-cell immunity to tumor antigens

    Geoffrey M. Lynn;Christine Sedlik;Christine Sedlik;Faezzah Baharom;Yaling Zhu

  • Control of tumour vascular permeability.

    Dilair F Baban;Leonard W Seymour

  • Melittin enables efficient vesicular escape and enhanced nuclear access of nonviral gene delivery vectors.

    Manfred Ogris;Robert C. Carlisle;Thierry Bettinger;Leonard W. Seymour

  • Laterally stabilized complexes of DNA with linear reducible polycations: strategy for triggered intracellular activation of DNA delivery vectors.

    David Oupický;and Alan L. Parker;Leonard W. Seymour

  • Lipid-mediated enhancement of transfection by a nonviral integrin-targeting vector.

    S. L. Hart;C. V. Arancibia-Carcamo;M. A. Wolfert;C. Mailhos

  • Systemic circulation of poly(L-lysine)/DNA vectors is influenced by polycation molecular weight and type of DNA: differential circulation in mice and rats and the implications for human gene therapy.

    Christopher M. Ward;Martin L. Read;Leonard W. Seymour

  • Physical properties and in vitro transfection efficiency of gene delivery vectors based on complexes of DNA with synthetic polycations.

    Tomáš Reschel;Čestmı́r Koňák;David Oupický;David Oupický;Leonard W. Seymour

  • Decreased Binding to Proteins and Cells of Polymeric Gene Delivery Vectors Surface Modified with a Multivalent Hydrophilic Polymer and Retargeting through Attachment of Transferrin

    Philip R. Dash;Martin L. Read;Kerry D. Fisher;Kenneth A. Howard

  • Tumour tropism and anti-cancer efficacy of polymer-based doxorubicin prodrugs in the treatment of subcutaneous murine B16F10 melanoma.

    L. W. Seymour;K. Ulbrich;P. S. Steyger;M. Brereton

Frequent Co-Authors

Karel Ulbrich
Karel Ulbrich Czech Academy of Sciences
Etienne Schacht
Etienne Schacht Ghent University
Ruth Duncan
Ruth Duncan Cardiff University
David J. Kerr
David J. Kerr University of Oxford
Margreet A. Wolfert
Margreet A. Wolfert Utrecht University
Manfred Ogris
Manfred Ogris University of Vienna
Andrew Baird
Andrew Baird University of California, San Diego
Robert A. Seder
Robert A. Seder National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Jindřich Kopeček
Jindřich Kopeček University of Utah
Martin Berry
Martin Berry University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to a range of exciting online degrees and flexible career paths in healthcare and related fields. Many students choose online learning for its convenience, affordability, and diverse specialization options.

For those with a nursing background seeking to advance their careers, a 12-month fnp program online can provide a fast route to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner, combining biology knowledge with patient care. If you're interested in nutrition, enrolling in an online nutrition degree can lead to roles in dietetics, public health, or wellness coaching.

Registered Nurses can opt for the easiest rn to bsn online program to strengthen their credentials and open up leadership or specialized clinical roles. Meanwhile, professionals keen on management can fast-track their advancement with a fast online master's in healthcare management, gaining valuable skills to lead organizations in the health sector.

These flexible online pathways make it easier than ever to align your biology or biochemistry background with high-growth, rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Leonard W. Seymour

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles