World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
B.G.M. van Engelen

B.G.M. van Engelen

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
23709
World Ranking
15677
National Ranking
597

B.G.M. van Engelen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where B.G.M. van Engelen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 506 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

B.G.M. van Engelen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where B.G.M. van Engelen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Member of Academia Europaea

Best Publications

  • Digenic inheritance of an SMCHD1 mutation and an FSHD-permissive D4Z4 allele causes facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2

    Richard J.L.F. Lemmers;Rabi Tawil;Lisa M. Petek;Judit Balog

  • Autoantibody profiles in the sera of European patients with myositis

    R. Brouwer;G.J.D. Hengstman;W.T.M. Vree Egberts;H. Ehrfeld

  • Glucose transporter-1 deficiency syndrome: The expanding clinical and genetic spectrum of a treatable disorder

    Wilhelmina G. Leen;Joerg Klepper;Marcel M. Verbeek;Maike Leferink

  • Anti-signal recognition particle autoantibodies : marker of a necrotising myopathy

    G.J.D. Hengstman;H.J. ter Laak;W.T.M. Vree Egberts;I.E. Lundberg

  • Adipose tissue thickness affects in vivo quantitative near-IR spectroscopy in human skeletal muscle.

    M. C. P. Van Beekvelt;M. S. Borghuis;B. G. M. Van Engelen;R. A. Wevers

  • The assessment of fatigue: Psychometric qualities and norms for the Checklist individual strength.

    M.G. Worm-Smeitink;M.F. Gielissen;L. Bloot;H.W.M. van Laarhoven

  • Population-based incidence and prevalence of facioscapulohumeral dystrophy.

    J.C.W. Deenen;H. Arnts;S.M. van der Maarel;G.W. Padberg

  • A second missense mutation in the mitochondrial ATPase 6 gene in Leigh's syndrome

    D. D. De Vries;B. G. M. Van Engelen;F. J. M. Gabreëls;W. Ruitenbeek

  • Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome. The International Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome Study Group.

    J.A.P. Hiel;C.M.R. Weemaes;L.P.W.J. van den Heuvel;B.G.M. van Engelen

  • Protein S-100B, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), myelin basic protein (MBP) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood of neurological patients.

    K.J.B. Lamers;P.J.E. Vos;M.M. Verbeek;F. Rosmalen

  • The Epidemiology of Neuromuscular Disorders: A Comprehensive Overview of the Literature.

    Johanna C.W. Deenen;Corinne G.C. Horlings;Jan J.G.M. Verschuuren;André L.M. Verbeek

  • Experienced fatigue in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy, myotonic dystrophy, and HMSN-I

    J.S. Kalkman;M.L. Schillings;S.P. van der Werf;G.W.A.M. Padberg

  • Pain in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Is Common, Severe, and Associated with Functional Impairment

    Nicol C. Voermans;Hans Knoop;Gijs Bleijenberg;Baziel G. van Engelen

  • Mutations in DNMT3B Modify Epigenetic Repression of the D4Z4 Repeat and the Penetrance of Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy

    Marlinde L. van den Boogaard;Richard J. L. F. Lemmers;Judit Balog;Marielle Wohlgemuth

  • Epidemiology of inclusion body myositis in the Netherlands: a nationwide study.

    U.A. Badrising;M. Maat-Schieman;S.G. van Duinen;F. Breedveld

  • Correlates of outcome and response to IVIg in 88 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy

    E.A. Cats;W.L. van der Pol;S. Piepers;H. Franssen

  • Causes and consequences of cerebral small vessel disease. The RUN DMC study: a prospective cohort study. Study rationale and protocol

    Anouk Gw van Norden;Karlijn F de Laat;Rob Ar Gons;Inge Wm van Uden

  • Successful treatment of dermatomyositis and polymyositis with anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha: preliminary observations.

    G.J.D. Hengstman;F.H.J. van den Hoogen;P. Barrera;M.G. Netea

  • Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis: the spectrum of imaging findings and the correlation with neuropathologic findings.

    F. Barkhof;A. Verrips;P. Wesseling;M.S. van der Knaap

  • Two divergent types of nerve pathology in patients with different P0 mutations in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

    A.A.W.M. Gabreëls-Festen;J.E. Hoogendijk;P.H.S. Meijerink;F.J.M. Gabreëls

Frequent Co-Authors

George W. Padberg
George W. Padberg Radboud University
Ron A. Wevers
Ron A. Wevers Radboud University
W. J. Van Venrooij
W. J. Van Venrooij Radboud University
P.A. van Doorn
P.A. van Doorn Erasmus University Rotterdam
Gijs Bleijenberg
Gijs Bleijenberg Radboud University
Arend Heerschap
Arend Heerschap Radboud University
Jan J.G.M. Verschuuren
Jan J.G.M. Verschuuren Leiden University Medical Center
Heinz Jungbluth
Heinz Jungbluth King's College London
Hans Scheffer
Hans Scheffer Radboud University
Jan A.M. Smeitink
Jan A.M. Smeitink Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Medicine but prefer alternative or supporting roles, there are several related online degree and career options to consider. For instance, medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid offer pathways into healthcare administration and support without direct patient care. These programs can lead to stable, in-demand careers.

If you’re exploring nursing, some programs offer easier entry. You might wonder, do you have to take a teas test for lpn? Many nursing schools now provide alternative admission routes, removing barriers like entrance exams.

For those interested in leadership, an healthcare administration degree online accredited can prepare you for management roles in hospitals or clinics, and many programs are designed to help you finish quickly.

Nurses looking to advance their qualifications can take advantage of rn to np bridge programs, which allow RNs to become Nurse Practitioners through flexible online study.

Best Scientists Citing B.G.M. van Engelen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles