World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dick F. Stegeman

Dick F. Stegeman

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
66
Citations
13775
World Ranking
3036
National Ranking
99

Dick F. Stegeman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dick F. Stegeman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 273 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Dick F. Stegeman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dick F. Stegeman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dick F. Stegeman is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands, contributing to the fields of engineering and medicine with a focus on biomedical and electrical engineering aspects. Their research spans multiple areas including neurogenetic and muscular disorders, muscle activation and electromyography, as well as musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation.

Their body of work includes six recent papers published between 2021 and 2023. These studies cover topics such as motor unit capacity, action potential conduction velocity, and muscle endurance, often within the context of spinal muscular atrophy and related neuromuscular conditions. Notable publications include:

  • Motor unit reserve capacity in spinal muscular atrophy during fatiguing endurance performance, 2021, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Enhanced low-threshold motor unit capacity during endurance tasks in patients with spinal muscular atrophy using pyridostigmine, 2023, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Low back muscle action potential conduction velocity estimated using high-density electromyography, 2022, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
  • Trunk extensor muscle endurance and its relationship to action potential conduction velocity and spectral parameters estimated using high-density electromyography, 2023, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
  • Motor Unit and Capillary Recruitment During Fatiguing Arm-Cycling Exercise in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Types 3 and 4, 2022, Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases

Stegeman has coauthored with researchers including Laura E. Habets, Bart Bartels, W. Ludo van der Pol, Jeroen A. L. Jeneson, and Ruben P. A. van Eijk. Collaborations with these individuals have produced multiple papers reinforcing a network of research focused on neuromuscular physiology and clinical neurophysiology.

The primary publication venues for Stegeman's work are:

  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
  • Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases

Stegeman's research fields reveal an interdisciplinary approach combining engineering principles and medical applications. The subfields of study encompass biomedical engineering, genetics, electrical and electronic engineering, pharmacology, and cognitive neuroscience. This diverse expertise supports investigations into muscle function, motor control, and neuromuscular disorders.

Core research topics include:

  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies

Best Publications

  • The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements

    T.F. Oostendorp;J. Delbeke;D.F. Stegeman

  • Definition dependent properties of the cortical silent period in upper-extremity muscles, a methodological study

    Annette Aa van Kuijk;Chantal D Bakker;Jan Cm Hendriks;Alexander Ch Geurts

  • Multichannel surface EMG: basic aspects and clinical utility.

    Machiel J. Zwarts;Dick F. Stegeman

  • Clinical applications of high-density surface EMG: a systematic review.

    Gea Drost;Dick F. Stegeman;Baziel G.M. van Engelen;Machiel J. Zwarts

  • Reliance on external cues for movement initiation in Parkinson's disease. Evidence from movement-related potentials.

    P. Praamstra;D.F. Stegeman;A.R. Cools;M.W.I.M. Horstink

  • Brain symmetry and topographic analysis of lateralized event-related potentials.

    Robert Oostenveld;Dick F. Stegeman;Peter Praamstra;Adriaan van Oosterom

  • Simulating Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation With a Detailed Anisotropic Human Head Model

    Sumientra M. Rampersad;Arno M. Janssen;Felix Lucka;Umit Aydin

  • Dipole source analysis suggests selective modulation of the supplementary motor area contribution to the readiness potential

    P. Praamstra;D.F. Stegeman;M.W.I.M. Horstink;A.R. Cools

  • Improving EMG-based muscle force estimation by using a high-density EMG grid and principal component analysis

    D. Staudenmann;Idsart Kingma;A. Daffertshofer;D.F. Stegeman

  • Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model

    S Wagner;S M Rampersad;Ü Aydin;J Vorwerk

  • Using two-dimensional spatial information in decomposition of surface EMG signals

    Bert U. Kleine;Bert U. Kleine;Johannes P. van Dijk;Johannes P. van Dijk;Bernd G. Lapatki;Bernd G. Lapatki;Bernd G. Lapatki;Machiel J. Zwarts;Machiel J. Zwarts

  • Relative contributions of central and peripheral factors to fatigue during a maximal sustained effort

    Maartje L. Schillings;Wouter Hoefsloot;Dick F. Stegeman;Machiel J. Zwarts

  • Phonological effects on the auditory N400 event-related brain potential.

    Peter Praamstra;Dick F. Stegeman

  • The motor unit potential distribution over the skin surface and its use in estimating the motor unit location

    K. Roeleveld;D.F. Stegeman;H.M. Vingerhoets;A. Van Oosterom

  • A high-density multichannel surface electromyography system for the characterization of single motor units

    JH Blok;JP van Dijk;Gea Drost;MJ Zwarts

  • Finite limb dimensions and finite muscle length in a model for the generation of electromyographic signals.

    T.H.J.M. Gootzen;D.F. Stegeman;A. Van Oosterom

  • Variability and interrelationships of surface EMG parameters during local muscle fatigue.

    Wim H. J. P. Linssen;Dick F. Stegeman;Ed M. G. Joosten;Servaas L. H. Notermans

  • Changes in muscle fiber conduction velocity indicate recruitment of distinct motor unit populations

    C. J. Houtman;D. F. Stegeman;J. P. Van Dijk;M. J. Zwarts

  • Volume conduction models for surface EMG; confrontation with measurements.

    K Roeleveld;J.H Blok;D.F Stegeman;A van Oosterom

  • Motor unit potential contribution to surface electromyography

    K. Roeleveld;D. F. Stegeman;H. M. Vingerhoets;A. Van Oosterom

  • The Calcium Sensitizer Levosimendan Improves Human Diaphragm Function

    Jonne Doorduin;Christer A. Sinderby;Jennifer Beck;Dick F. Stegeman

  • The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas

    Arno M Janssen;Thom F Oostendorp;Dick F Stegeman

  • EVIDENCE FOR LATERAL PREMOTOR AND PARIETAL OVERACTIVITY IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE DURING SEQUENTIAL AND BIMANUAL MOVEMENTS. A PET STUDY

    P. Praamstra;D. F. Stegeman;A. R. Cools;Antje S. Meyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Praamstra
Peter Praamstra Radboud University
Dieter Felsenberg
Dieter Felsenberg Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Alexander R. Cools
Alexander R. Cools Radboud University
Carsten H. Wolters
Carsten H. Wolters University of Münster
Robert Oostenveld
Robert Oostenveld Radboud University
Tjeerd W. Boonstra
Tjeerd W. Boonstra Maastricht University
Jaap H. van Dieën
Jaap H. van Dieën Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dario Farina
Dario Farina Imperial College London
J.G. van Dijk
J.G. van Dijk Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Dick F. Stegeman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles