World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 54 12708 11435 60 52 258 9423

Tomáš Etrych publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tomáš Etrych between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tomáš Etrych published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2023. 22 of the 295 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2023. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 46 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 5 publications
2001 2026

295 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tomáš Etrych: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 7
2003 3
2004 6
2005 4
2006 6
2007 2
2008 7
2009 3
2010 8
2011 6
2012 8
2013 9
2014 4
2015 11
2016 18
2017 17
2018 27
2019 14
2020 18
2021 11
2022 15
2023 46
2024 21
2025 17
2026 5
Total 295
Download as CSV

Tomáš Etrych publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomáš Etrych sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 258 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100 258
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Tomáš Etrych D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomáš Etrych sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933 54
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • In vivo characterization of the physicochemical properties of polymer-linked TLR agonists that enhance vaccine immunogenicity

    Geoffrey M Lynn;Geoffrey M Lynn;Richard Laga;Richard Laga;Patricia A Darrah;Andrew S Ishizuka

  • New HPMA copolymers containing doxorubicin bound via pH-sensitive linkage: synthesis and preliminary in vitro and in vivo biological properties.

    Tomas Etrych;Markéta Jelinkova;Blanka Rihova;Karel Ulbrich

  • Core-crosslinked polymeric micelles with controlled release of covalently entrapped doxorubicin.

    Marina Talelli;Maryam Iman;Amir K. Varkouhi;Cristianne J.F. Rijcken

  • HPMA copolymers with pH-controlled release of doxorubicin: in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo antitumor activity.

    K. Ulbrich;T. Etrych;P. Chytil;M. Jelinkova

  • Biodegradable star HPMA polymer-drug conjugates: Biodegradability, distribution and anti-tumor efficacy.

    Tomáš Etrych;Lubomír Kovář;Jiří Strohalm;Petr Chytil

  • N-(2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide-based polymer conjugates with pH-controlled activation of doxorubicin for cell-specific or passive tumour targeting. Synthesis by RAFT polymerisation and physicochemical characterisation.

    Petr Chytil;Tomáš Etrych;Jaroslav Kříž;Vladimír Šubr

  • Synthesis of HPMA Copolymers Containing Doxorubicin Bound via a Hydrazone Linkage. Effect of Spacer on Drug Release and in vitro Cytotoxicity

    Tomáš Etrych;Petr Chytil;Markéta Jelínková;Blanka Říhová

  • N-(2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide-Based Polymer Conjugates with pH-Controlled Activation of Doxorubicin. I. New Synthesis, Physicochemical Characterization and Preliminary Biological Evaluation

    Tomáš Etrych;Tomáš Mrkvan;Petr Chytil;Čestmír Koňák

  • Nanomedicines for Inflammatory Arthritis: Head-to-Head Comparison of Glucocorticoid-Containing Polymers, Micelles, and Liposomes

    Lingdong Quan;Yijia Zhang;Bart J Crielaard;Anand Dusad

  • New HPMA copolymer-based drug carriers with covalently bound hydrophobic substituents for solid tumour targeting

    P. Chytil;T. Etrych;Č. Koňák;M. Šírová

  • Fluorescence optical imaging in anticancer drug delivery

    Unknown

  • Antibody-targeted polymer-doxorubicin conjugates with pH-controlled activation.

    Ulbrich K;Etrych T;Chytil P;Jelínková M

  • Effect of physicochemical modification on the biodistribution and tumor accumulation of HPMA copolymers.

    Twan Lammers;Twan Lammers;Rainer Kühnlein;Maria Kissel;Vladimir Subr

  • HPMA copolymer-doxorubicin conjugates: The effects of molecular weight and architecture on biodistribution and in vivo activity.

    Tomáš Etrych;Vladimír Šubr;Jiří Strohalm;Milada Šírová

  • HPMA copolymer conjugates of paclitaxel and docetaxel with pH-controlled drug release.

    Tomáš Etrych;Milada Šírová;L. Starovoytova;Blanka Říhová

  • Polymer‐coated polyethylenimine/DNA complexes designed for triggered activation by intracellular reduction

    Robert C. Carlisle;Tomas Etrych;Simon S. Briggs;Jon A. Preece

  • Intrinsically active nanobody-modified polymeric micelles for tumor-targeted combination therapy

    M. Talelli;S. Oliveira;C.J. Rijcken;E.H. Pieters

  • Two step mechanisms of tumor selective delivery of N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymer conjugated with pirarubicin via an acid-cleavable linkage

    Hideaki Nakamura;Tomas Etrych;Petr Chytil;Manami Ohkubo

  • Doxorubicin bound to a HPMA copolymer carrier through hydrazone bond is effective also in a cancer cell line with a limited content of lysosomes.

    B. R̆ı́hová;T. Etrych;M. Pechar;M. Jelı́nková

  • HPMA-based polymer conjugates with drug combination.

    Hana Krakovičová;Tomáš Etrych;Karel Ulbrich

Frequent Co-Authors

Karel Ulbrich
Karel Ulbrich Czech Academy of Sciences
Twan Lammers
Twan Lammers RWTH Aachen University
Hiroshi Maeda
Hiroshi Maeda Kumamoto University
Gert Storm
Gert Storm Utrecht University
Jan Konvalinka
Jan Konvalinka Czech Academy of Sciences
Christine M. Papadakis
Christine M. Papadakis Technical University of Munich
Wim E. Hennink
Wim E. Hennink Utrecht University
Vladimír Křen
Vladimír Křen Czech Academy of Sciences
Fabian Kiessling
Fabian Kiessling RWTH Aachen University
Dmitri I. Svergun
Dmitri I. Svergun European Bioinformatics Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Chemistry in the USA opens diverse career opportunities, many of which can be supported by related online programs. For those interested in legal and scientific intersections, obtaining a paralegal certificate can be a strategic step. This credential enhances understanding of regulatory frameworks crucial in chemical patent law and compliance roles.

Another promising path lies in the pharmaceutical industry. Chemistry graduates often transition into sales roles; learning how much do drug reps make and what the career trajectory looks like helps in aligning expectations with industry standards and highlights the importance of strong scientific knowledge when communicating drug benefits.

For those passionate about healthcare and medication management, exploring the steps to become a pharmacist provides a clear roadmap towards this essential profession. A solid chemistry background supports pharmacy studies, enabling deeper comprehension of drug composition and pharmacodynamics.

Finally, chemistry experts interested in forensic science can consider roles related to medical investigations by reviewing educational paths on how to become a medical examiner assistant. This career blends scientific analysis with legal processes, requiring specialized knowledge in chemistry and biology.

Best Scientists Citing Tomáš Etrych

Recently Published Articles