World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
135
Citations
90639
World Ranking
2025
National Ranking
59

David S. Celermajer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. Celermajer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,080 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David S. Celermajer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. Celermajer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 135 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award
  • 2018 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science
  • 2006 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science

Overview

David S. Celermajer is affiliated with the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on areas within medicine, with a significant emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Other subfields include epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The main topics covered in their work involve studies and treatments related to congenital heart disease, cardiac valve diseases, cardiovascular function and risk factors, pulmonary hypertension, cardiac structural anomalies and repair, aortic disease, and cardiac arrhythmias and treatments.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with David S. Celermajer include:

  • Rachael Cordina
  • Geoff Strange
  • David Playford
  • Yves d'Udekem
  • Simon Stewart

Celermajer's publications often appear in several notable venues in the field of cardiovascular research. These include:

  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • European Heart Journal
  • International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of the American Heart Association

Recent papers by David S. Celermajer include:

  • Recommendations for exercise in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease, 2020, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Atrial septal defect in adulthood: a new paradigm for congenital heart disease, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in 436,360 men and women: the National Echo Database Australia (NEDA), 2020, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Ejection fraction and mortality: a nationwide register-based cohort study of 499,153 women and men, 2020, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Adverse Prognostic Impact of Even Mild or Moderate Tricuspid Regurgitation: Insights from the National Echocardiography Database of Australia, 2022, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

David S. Celermajer has been recognized with fellowships from prestigious Australian academies. They were awarded Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science in 2018, and Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science in 2006.

Best Publications

  • Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis

    D.S. Celermajer;K.E. Sorensen;V.M. Gooch;D.J. Spiegelhalter

  • Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: A report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force

    Mary C Corretti;Todd J Anderson;Emelia J Benjamin;David Celermajer

  • Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension

    Gerald Simonneau;Michael A Gatzoulis;Ian Adatia;David Celermajer

  • Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension.

    Gérald Simonneau;Gérald Simonneau;David Montani;David Montani;David S. Celermajer;Christopher P. Denton

  • Cigarette smoking is associated with dose-related and potentially reversible impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation in healthy young adults.

    David S. Celermajer;Keld E. Sorensen;Dimitri Georgakopoulos;Catherine Bull

  • Endothelium-dependent dilation in the systemic arteries of asymptomatic subjects relates to coronary risk factors and their interaction☆

    David S. Celermajer;Keld E. Sorensen;Catherine Bull;Jacqui Robinson

  • Aging is associated with endothelial dysfunction in healthy men years before the age-related decline in women

    David S. Celermajer;Keld E. Sorensen;David J. Spiegelhalter;Dimitri Georgakopoulos

  • The Assessment of Endothelial Function From Research Into Clinical Practice

    Andreas J. Flammer;Todd Anderson;David S. Celermajer;Mark A. Creager;Mark A. Creager

  • Passive Smoking and Impaired Endothelium-Dependent Arterial Dilatation in Healthy Young Adults

    David S. Celermajer;Mark R. Adams;Peter Clarkson;Jacqui Robinson

  • Endothelial dysfunction: does it matter? Is it reversible?

    David S Celermajer

  • Non-invasive measurement of human endothelium dependent arterial responses: accuracy and reproducibility.

    K. E. Sorensen;D. S. Celermajer;D. J. Spiegelhalter;D. Georgakopoulos

  • Prevalence of Rheumatic Heart Disease Detected by Echocardiographic Screening

    Eloi Marijon;Phalla Ou;David S. Celermajer;Beatriz Ferreira

  • Rheumatic Heart Disease

    Eloi Marijon;Mariana Mirabel;Mariana Mirabel;Mariana Mirabel;David S Celermajer;Xavier Jouven

  • Impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation is an early event in children with familial hypercholesterolemia and is related to the lipoprotein(a) level.

    K E Sorensen;D S Celermajer;D Georgakopoulos;G Hatcher

  • Hyperhomocyst(e)inemia Is a Risk Factor for Arterial Endothelial Dysfunction in Humans

    K.S. Woo;P. Chook;Y.I. Lolin;A.S.P. Cheung

  • Long-term outcome in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries: a multi-institutional study.

    Thomas P. Graham;Yvonne D. Bernard;Beverly G. Mellen;David Celermajer

  • Elite endurance athletes and the ACE I allele – the role of genes in athletic performance

    George Gayagay;Bing Yu;Brett Hambly;Tanya Boston

  • Effects of Diet and Exercise on Obesity-Related Vascular Dysfunction in Children

    Kam S. Woo;Ping Chook;Chung W. Yu;Rita Y.T. Sung

  • Myocarditis and cardiomyopathy associated with clozapine

    Jens G Kilian;Kristin Kerr;Christopher Lawrence;David S Celermajer;David S Celermajer

  • Evaluation and Management of the Child and Adult With Fontan Circulation: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

    Jack Rychik;Andrew M. Atz;David S. Celermajer;Barbara J. Deal

Frequent Co-Authors

Guy B. Marks
Guy B. Marks University of New South Wales
John E. Deanfield
John E. Deanfield University College London
Robert G. Weintraub
Robert G. Weintraub Royal Children's Hospital
Stuart M. Grieve
Stuart M. Grieve University of Sydney
Roland Stocker
Roland Stocker The Heart Research Institute
Anthony C. Keech
Anthony C. Keech University of Sydney
Damien Bonnet
Damien Bonnet Université Paris Cité
Shisan Bao
Shisan Bao University of Sydney
David J. Handelsman
David J. Handelsman University of Sydney
Kerry-Anne Rye
Kerry-Anne Rye University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare careers or looking for advanced training beyond a traditional MD? There are many online degree programs that offer flexible pathways into nursing, mental health, and other in-demand fields.

For aspiring nurse practitioners, accelerated dnp programs online provide a quicker route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. Similarly, those seeking flexible but reputable doctoral-level programs can explore a variety of dnp programs designed for working professionals.

Those starting their nursing careers may benefit from a lpn fast track program, helping students become Licensed Practical Nurses in less time through online study. Additionally, mental health is a growing field; the shortest online pmhnp programs can guide you toward becoming a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner quickly and efficiently.

Choosing an online pathway can save time and provide the flexibility needed to balance work and study, letting you advance your career in healthcare from anywhere in the world.

Best Scientists Citing David S. Celermajer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles