World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 135 2025 1885 59 56 1080 90639

David S. Celermajer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David S. Celermajer between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David S. Celermajer published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 27.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 76 publications in 2020. 31 of the 1,193 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 76. Peak 76 publications in 2020. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 31 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 27 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 36 publications 2008: 41 publications 2009: 37 publications 2010: 48 publications 2011: 43 publications 2012: 55 publications 2013: 62 publications 2014: 74 publications 2015: 51 publications 2016: 59 publications 2017: 59 publications 2018: 60 publications 2019: 48 publications 2020: 76 publications 2021: 56 publications 2022: 42 publications 2023: 40 publications 2024: 38 publications 2025: 30 publications 2026: 1 publication
1984 2026

1,193 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David S. Celermajer: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 10
1992 3
1993 7
1994 16
1995 6
1996 8
1997 16
1998 13
1999 17
2000 31
2001 13
2002 14
2003 27
2004 9
2005 21
2006 24
2007 36
2008 41
2009 37
2010 48
2011 43
2012 55
2013 62
2014 74
2015 51
2016 59
2017 59
2018 60
2019 48
2020 76
2021 56
2022 42
2023 40
2024 38
2025 30
2026 1
Total 1,193
Download as CSV

David S. Celermajer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. Celermajer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,061–1,080 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,080 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77 1,080
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

David S. Celermajer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David S. Celermajer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 134–135 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 135 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163 135
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Australia Leader Award
  • 2018 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science
  • 2006 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science

Overview

David S. Celermajer is affiliated with the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on areas within medicine, with a significant emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Other subfields include epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The main topics covered in their work involve studies and treatments related to congenital heart disease, cardiac valve diseases, cardiovascular function and risk factors, pulmonary hypertension, cardiac structural anomalies and repair, aortic disease, and cardiac arrhythmias and treatments.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with David S. Celermajer include:

  • Rachael Cordina
  • Geoff Strange
  • David Playford
  • Yves d'Udekem
  • Simon Stewart

Celermajer's publications often appear in several notable venues in the field of cardiovascular research. These include:

  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • European Heart Journal
  • International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of the American Heart Association

Recent papers by David S. Celermajer include:

  • Recommendations for exercise in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease, 2020, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Atrial septal defect in adulthood: a new paradigm for congenital heart disease, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in 436,360 men and women: the National Echo Database Australia (NEDA), 2020, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Ejection fraction and mortality: a nationwide register-based cohort study of 499,153 women and men, 2020, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Adverse Prognostic Impact of Even Mild or Moderate Tricuspid Regurgitation: Insights from the National Echocardiography Database of Australia, 2022, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

David S. Celermajer has been recognized with fellowships from prestigious Australian academies. They were awarded Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science in 2018, and Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science in 2006.

Best Publications

  • Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis

    D.S. Celermajer;K.E. Sorensen;V.M. Gooch;D.J. Spiegelhalter

  • Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: A report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force

    Mary C Corretti;Todd J Anderson;Emelia J Benjamin;David Celermajer

  • Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension

    Gerald Simonneau;Michael A Gatzoulis;Ian Adatia;David Celermajer

  • Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension.

    Gérald Simonneau;Gérald Simonneau;David Montani;David Montani;David S. Celermajer;Christopher P. Denton

  • Cigarette smoking is associated with dose-related and potentially reversible impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation in healthy young adults.

    David S. Celermajer;Keld E. Sorensen;Dimitri Georgakopoulos;Catherine Bull

  • Endothelium-dependent dilation in the systemic arteries of asymptomatic subjects relates to coronary risk factors and their interaction☆

    David S. Celermajer;Keld E. Sorensen;Catherine Bull;Jacqui Robinson

  • Aging is associated with endothelial dysfunction in healthy men years before the age-related decline in women

    David S. Celermajer;Keld E. Sorensen;David J. Spiegelhalter;Dimitri Georgakopoulos

  • The Assessment of Endothelial Function From Research Into Clinical Practice

    Andreas J. Flammer;Todd Anderson;David S. Celermajer;Mark A. Creager;Mark A. Creager

  • Passive Smoking and Impaired Endothelium-Dependent Arterial Dilatation in Healthy Young Adults

    David S. Celermajer;Mark R. Adams;Peter Clarkson;Jacqui Robinson

  • Endothelial dysfunction: does it matter? Is it reversible?

    David S Celermajer

  • Non-invasive measurement of human endothelium dependent arterial responses: accuracy and reproducibility.

    K. E. Sorensen;D. S. Celermajer;D. J. Spiegelhalter;D. Georgakopoulos

  • Prevalence of Rheumatic Heart Disease Detected by Echocardiographic Screening

    Eloi Marijon;Phalla Ou;David S. Celermajer;Beatriz Ferreira

  • Rheumatic Heart Disease

    Eloi Marijon;Mariana Mirabel;Mariana Mirabel;Mariana Mirabel;David S Celermajer;Xavier Jouven

  • Impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation is an early event in children with familial hypercholesterolemia and is related to the lipoprotein(a) level.

    K E Sorensen;D S Celermajer;D Georgakopoulos;G Hatcher

  • Hyperhomocyst(e)inemia Is a Risk Factor for Arterial Endothelial Dysfunction in Humans

    K.S. Woo;P. Chook;Y.I. Lolin;A.S.P. Cheung

  • Long-term outcome in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries: a multi-institutional study.

    Thomas P. Graham;Yvonne D. Bernard;Beverly G. Mellen;David Celermajer

  • Elite endurance athletes and the ACE I allele – the role of genes in athletic performance

    George Gayagay;Bing Yu;Brett Hambly;Tanya Boston

  • Effects of Diet and Exercise on Obesity-Related Vascular Dysfunction in Children

    Kam S. Woo;Ping Chook;Chung W. Yu;Rita Y.T. Sung

  • Myocarditis and cardiomyopathy associated with clozapine

    Jens G Kilian;Kristin Kerr;Christopher Lawrence;David S Celermajer;David S Celermajer

  • Evaluation and Management of the Child and Adult With Fontan Circulation: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

    Jack Rychik;Andrew M. Atz;David S. Celermajer;Barbara J. Deal

Frequent Co-Authors

Guy B. Marks
Guy B. Marks University of New South Wales
John E. Deanfield
John E. Deanfield University College London
Robert G. Weintraub
Robert G. Weintraub Royal Children's Hospital
Stuart M. Grieve
Stuart M. Grieve University of Sydney
Roland Stocker
Roland Stocker The Heart Research Institute
Anthony C. Keech
Anthony C. Keech University of Sydney
Damien Bonnet
Damien Bonnet Université Paris Cité
Shisan Bao
Shisan Bao University of Sydney
David J. Handelsman
David J. Handelsman University of Sydney
Kerry-Anne Rye
Kerry-Anne Rye University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare careers or looking for advanced training beyond a traditional MD? There are many online degree programs that offer flexible pathways into nursing, mental health, and other in-demand fields.

For aspiring nurse practitioners, accelerated dnp programs online provide a quicker route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. Similarly, those seeking flexible but reputable doctoral-level programs can explore a variety of dnp programs designed for working professionals.

Those starting their nursing careers may benefit from a lpn fast track program, helping students become Licensed Practical Nurses in less time through online study. Additionally, mental health is a growing field; the shortest online pmhnp programs can guide you toward becoming a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner quickly and efficiently.

Choosing an online pathway can save time and provide the flexibility needed to balance work and study, letting you advance your career in healthcare from anywhere in the world.

Best Scientists Citing David S. Celermajer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles