World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
15608
World Ranking
18942
National Ranking
9443

Charles D. Fraser publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles D. Fraser sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 480 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Charles D. Fraser D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles D. Fraser sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles D. Fraser is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medical and surgical aspects within the field of medicine, with a significant emphasis on surgical procedures, epidemiology, and cardiology.

Their scholarly output includes extensive work in subfields such as surgery, epidemiology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and biomedical engineering. This multidisciplinary approach reflects an integration of clinical and technical expertise in the study of cardiovascular conditions and related medical interventions.

The scientist's research topics cover various aspects of cardiovascular health and treatment. Key areas include congenital heart disease studies, cardiac structural anomalies and repair, mechanical circulatory support devices, transplantation methods and outcomes, cardiac arrhythmias and treatments, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, and coronary artery anomalies.

Among the recent published papers authored or co-authored by Charles D. Fraser are:

  • Twenty-Three-Year Experience With the Arterial Switch Operation: Expectations and Long-Term Outcomes, 2020, Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Diaphragm Paralysis After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: An STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database Study, 2020, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Other prominent recent papers in the field, where Fraser contributed, include studies focused on anomalous coronary artery origins and myocardial ischemia in children, published in the journal Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions.

  • Outcomes in Anomalous Aortic Origin of a Coronary Artery Following a Prospective Standardized Approach, 2020, Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Myocardial Ischemia in Children With Anomalous Aortic Origin of a Coronary Artery With Intraseptal Course, 2020, Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions

Charles D. Fraser frequently collaborates with other researchers, with notable co-authors including Andrew Well, Carlos M. Mery, Ziv Beckerman, Michelle Mizrahi, and Matthew F. Mikulski. These collaborations have contributed to a body of work that spans cardiothoracic surgery and related cardiovascular research.

Their research has been published repeatedly in several scientific venues, reflecting ongoing engagement with the cardiology and thoracic surgery communities. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Cardiology in the Young
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery
  • Circulation

Best Publications

  • Prospective trial of a pediatric ventricular assist device.

    Charles D. Fraser;Robert D.B. Jaquiss;David N. Rosenthal;Tilman Humpl

  • Congenital heart surgery in infants: effects of acute kidney injury on outcomes.

    Joshua J. Blinder;Stuart L. Goldstein;Vei-Vei Lee;Alixandra Baycroft

  • Brain immaturity is associated with brain injury before and after neonatal cardiac surgery with high-flow bypass and cerebral oxygenation monitoring

    Dean B. Andropoulos;Dean B. Andropoulos;Jill V. Hunter;Jill V. Hunter;David P. Nelson;David P. Nelson;Stephen A. Stayer;Stephen A. Stayer

  • Bridging children of all sizes to cardiac transplantation: The initial multicenter North American experience with the Berlin Heart EXCOR ventricular assist device

    David L.S. Morales;Christopher S.D. Almond;Robert D.B. Jaquiss;David N. Rosenthal

  • Expert consensus guidelines: Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery.

    Michele A. Frommelt;Robert D.B. Jaquiss;Robert J. Myerburg

  • Hot Topics in Tetralogy of Fallot

    Juan Villafañe;Jeffrey A. Feinstein;Kathy J. Jenkins;Robert N. Vincent

  • A noninvasive estimation of mixed venous oxygen saturation using near-infrared spectroscopy by cerebral oximetry in pediatric cardiac surgery patients

    Tia A. Tortoriello;Stephen A. Stayer;Antonio R. Mott;E. Dean McKENZIE

  • Outcome of 121 Patients with Congenitally Corrected Transpositionof the Great Arteries

    J.M. Rutledge;M.R. Nihill;C.D. Fraser;O'Brian E. Smith

  • Early initiation of peritoneal dialysis after surgical repair of congenital heart disease

    J. M. Sorof;Daniel Stromberg;Eileen D. Brewer;Timothy F. Feltes

  • Metabolic changes preceding functional and morphologic indices of rejection in heterotopic cardiac allografts. A 31P nuclear magnetic resonance study.

    Charles D. Fraser;Vadappuram P. Chacko;William E. Jacobus;Renate L. Soulen

  • The association between brain injury, perioperative anesthetic exposure, and 12-month neurodevelopmental outcomes after neonatal cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study

    Dean B. Andropoulos;Dean B. Andropoulos;Hasan B. Ahmad;Hasan B. Ahmad;Taha Haq;Ken Brady;Ken Brady

  • Tetralogy of Fallot: surgical management individualized to the patient

    Charles D Fraser;Charles D Fraser;E.Dean McKenzie;E.Dean McKenzie;Denton A Cooley

  • Incidence and treatment of chylothorax after cardiac surgery in children: analysis of a large multi-institution database.

    Carlos M. Mery;Carlos M. Mery;Brady S. Moffett;Brady S. Moffett;Muhammad S. Khan;Wei Zhang

  • Cardiovascular Effects of Sevoflurane, Isoflurane, Halothane, and Fentanyl–Midazolam in Children with Congenital Heart Disease: An Echocardiographic Study of Myocardial Contractility and Hemodynamics

    Shannon M. Rivenes;Mark B. Lewin;Stephen A. Stayer;Sabrina T. Bent

  • Innovative Techniques for Placement of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads in Patients with Limited Venous Access to the Heart

    Bryan C. Cannon;Richard A. Friedman;Arnold L. Fenrich;Charles D. Fraser

  • Quality Measures for Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

    Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs;Marshall Lewis Jacobs;Erle H. Austin;Constantine Mavroudis

  • Current Expectations for Surgical Repair of Isolated Ventricular Septal Defects

    Brandi Braud Scully;Brandi Braud Scully;David L.S. Morales;David L.S. Morales;Farhan Zafar;Farhan Zafar;E. Dean McKenzie;E. Dean McKenzie

  • Risk factors for development of endocarditis and reintervention in patients undergoing right ventricle to pulmonary artery valved conduit placement

    Carlos M. Mery;Francisco A. Guzmán-Pruneda;Luis E. De León;Luis E. De León;Wei Zhang

  • The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database: 2016 Update on Outcomes and Quality

    Jeffrey P. Jacobs;John E. Mayer;Constantine Mavroudis;Sean M. O'Brien

  • BioGlue surgical adhesive impairs aortic growth and causes anastomotic strictures.

    Scott A. LeMaire;Zachary C. Schmittling;Joseph S. Coselli;Akif Ündar;Akif Ündar

Frequent Co-Authors

jeffrey a towbin
jeffrey a towbin St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Joseph S. Coselli
Joseph S. Coselli Baylor College of Medicine
John V. Conte
John V. Conte Pennsylvania State University
James S. Tweddell
James S. Tweddell Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Jeffrey P. Jacobs
Jeffrey P. Jacobs University of Florida
Marek Czosnyka
Marek Czosnyka University of Cambridge
Eric Boerwinkle
Eric Boerwinkle The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
John E. Mayer
John E. Mayer Boston Children's Hospital
John W. Belmont
John W. Belmont Baylor College of Medicine
Peter Smielewski
Peter Smielewski University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine or healthcare in the USA involves many possible pathways and degree options. For registered nurses looking to elevate their qualifications, rn to bsn online programs offer a flexible and cost-effective way to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing, often while working full time.

For those holding a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, entry level msn programs online provide a fast-tracked path into the nursing profession, helping you obtain a Master’s in Nursing without starting from scratch. If you’re new to healthcare and want a bachelor’s degree in nursing, online bsn programs for non nurses can be a great choice, offering accessible entry requirements.

Not every healthcare position requires patient care. For those interested in the administrative side, there are reputable accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid that train students for critical back-office roles. Exploring these diverse online degree options can open up multiple fulfilling career pathways in medicine and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Charles D. Fraser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles