World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
36734
World Ranking
16401
National Ranking
8253

John V. Conte publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John V. Conte sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 364 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John V. Conte D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John V. Conte sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John V. Conte is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work extensively covers cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, with significant contributions to related subfields including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, health informatics, and health information management.

The scientist's research centers on several key topics, notably cardiac valve diseases and treatments, cardiac anesthesia and surgical outcomes, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, cardiovascular function and risk factors, aortic disease and treatment approaches, coronary artery anomalies, and the application of artificial intelligence in healthcare and education.

Conte's recent publications reflect a concentration on practical and clinical aspects of heart valve surgery and interventions. These include:

  • Complete 2-Year Results Confirm Bayesian Analysis of the SURTAVI Trial, 2020, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Unicuspid Aortic Valve Repair Using Geometric Ring Annuloplasty, 2020, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Machine Learning in Heart Valve Surgery, 2021, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • Time From First Contact With Heart Team to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the COVID-19 Era, 2023, Cureus
  • Simulation-Based Training in Cardiac Surgery, 2020, UNC Libraries

Frequent collaborators in Conte's research include Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Jeffrey J. Popma, Stephan Windecker, Susheel Kodali, and Isaac George. These coauthors have appeared alongside Conte in multiple publications, contributing to various projects within the cardiovascular and cardiac surgery domains.

Publications are distributed across several academic venues, illustrating a scope that bridges clinical practice and medical research. These venues consist of:

  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • Cureus
  • UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • Advanced Heart Failure Treated with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device

    Mark S. Slaughter;Joseph G. Rogers;Carmelo A. Milano;Stuart D. Russell

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis

    David H. Adams;Jeffrey J. Popma;Michael J. Reardon;Steven J. Yakubov

  • Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients

    M. J. Reardon;N. M. Van Mieghem;J. J. Popma;N. S. Kleiman

  • Use of a Continuous-Flow Device in Patients Awaiting Heart Transplantation

    Leslie W. Miller;Leslie W. Miller;Francis D. Pagani;Stuart D. Russell;Ranjit John

  • International guidelines for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2006 update--a consensus report from the Pulmonary Scientific Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

    Jonathan B. Orens;Marc Estenne;Selim Arcasoy;John V. Conte

  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a self-expanding bioprosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis at extreme risk for surgery.

    Jeffrey J. Popma;David H. Adams;Michael J. Reardon;Steven J. Yakubov

  • Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device.

    Francis D. Pagani;Leslie W. Miller;Stuart D. Russell;Keith D. Aaronson

  • The pathophysiology of heart failure.

    Clinton D. Kemp;John V. Conte

  • Results of the Post-U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Approval Study With a Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation: A Prospective Study Using the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support)

    Randall C. Starling;Yoshifumi Naka;Andrew J. Boyle;Gonzalo Gonzalez-Stawinski

  • Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Improves Functional Capacity and Quality of Life of Advanced Heart Failure Patients

    Joseph G. Rogers;Keith D. Aaronson;Andrew J. Boyle;Stuart D. Russell

  • Dysfunctional Voltage-Gated K+ Channels in Pulmonary Artery Smooth Muscle Cells of Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

    Jason Xiao Jian Yuan;Ann M. Aldinger;Magdalena Juhaszova;Jian Wang

  • Surgical Repair of Ventricular Septal Defect After Myocardial Infarction: Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database

    George J. Arnaoutakis;Yue Zhao;Timothy J. George;Christopher M. Sciortino

  • 2-Year Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgical or Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    Michael J. Reardon;David H. Adams;Neal S. Kleiman;Steven J. Yakubov

  • Autologous mesenchymal stem cells produce concordant improvements in regional function, tissue perfusion, and fibrotic burden when administered to patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: The Prospective Randomized Study of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery (PROMETHEUS) trial.

    Vasileios karantalis;Darcy L DiFede;Gary Gerstenblith;Si M Pham

  • Maintenance azithromycin therapy for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: results of a pilot study.

    Susan G. Gerhardt;John F. McDyer;Reda E. Girgis;John V. Conte

  • 3-Year Outcomes in High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    G. Michael Deeb;Michael J. Reardon;Stan Chetcuti;Himanshu J. Patel

  • 5-Year Outcomes of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients

    Thomas G. Gleason;Michael J. Reardon;Jeffrey J. Popma;G. Michael Deeb

  • Working formulation for the standardization of definitions of infections in patients using ventricular assist devices.

    Margaret M. Hannan;Shahid Husain;Frauke Mattner;Lara Danziger-Isakov

  • Risk factors for the development of obliterative bronchiolitis after lung transplantation

    R. E. Girgis;I. Tu;G. J. Berry;H. Reichenspurner

  • Autologous mesenchymal stem cells produce reverse remodelling in chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy

    Karl H. Schuleri;Gary S. Feigenbaum;Marco Centola;Eric S. Weiss

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart D. Russell
Stuart D. Russell Duke University
William A. Baumgartner
William A. Baumgartner Johns Hopkins University
Jeffrey J. Popma
Jeffrey J. Popma Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Michael J. Reardon
Michael J. Reardon Houston Methodist
Neal S. Kleiman
Neal S. Kleiman Houston Methodist
Ranjit John
Ranjit John University of Minnesota
Joshua M. Hare
Joshua M. Hare University of Miami
Francis D. Pagani
Francis D. Pagani University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Charles D. Fraser
Charles D. Fraser The University of Texas at Austin
David H. Adams
David H. Adams Mount Sinai Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary health professions can open many doors for those interested in medicine but seeking diverse career options. Online learning has made it easier than ever to access high-quality degree programs in health care and allied fields.

For those interested in nutrition, an online dietitian degree can provide a pathway to become a registered dietitian, supporting patient wellness and disease prevention. Aspiring leaders and administrators may consider a cahme accredited online mha programs list to find top Master of Health Administration degrees, which are vital for those pursuing healthcare management roles.

Nurses looking to advance their credentials can check out rn bsn online programs no clinicals, which offer flexible options to earn a BSN without mandatory onsite clinicals. For nurses aiming for advanced clinical practice or leadership, accelerated options are available via the fastest msn to dnp program.

Whether you’re considering patient care, administration, or specialized fields, these online pathways offer diverse opportunities to build a rewarding healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing John V. Conte

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles