World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael J. Reardon

Michael J. Reardon

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
36533
World Ranking
14403
National Ranking
7284

Michael J. Reardon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Reardon sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 802 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael J. Reardon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Reardon sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Reardon is affiliated with Houston Methodist in the United States. Their research has extensively contributed to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. They have published 955 works in medicine, including 456 in cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, 183 in epidemiology, 128 in pulmonary and respiratory medicine, 106 in surgery, and 49 in radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

Their main topics of research involve cardiac valve diseases and treatments, infective endocarditis diagnosis and management, aortic disease and treatment approaches, cardiovascular function and risk factors, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, cardiac structural anomalies and repair, and cardiac tumors and thrombi.

Michael J. Reardon has contributed to a variety of publication venues, most notably:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Some of the recent papers associated with their work include:

  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research (2021), Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research (2020), European Heart Journal
  • Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery (2021), New England Journal of Medicine
  • Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Leaflet Thickening in the Evolut Low Risk Sub-Study (2020), Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • 4-Year Outcomes of Patients With Aortic Stenosis in the Evolut Low Risk Trial (2023), Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include Neal S. Kleiman, Sachin S. Goel, Marvin D. Atkins, Steven J. Yakubov, and Stephen H. Little, indicating ongoing collaborative work in the cardiovascular field.

Best Publications

  • Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients

    Jeffrey J Popma;G Michael Deeb;Steven J Yakubov;Mubashir Mumtaz

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis

    David H. Adams;Jeffrey J. Popma;Michael J. Reardon;Steven J. Yakubov

  • Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients

    M. J. Reardon;N. M. Van Mieghem;J. J. Popma;N. S. Kleiman

  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research.

    Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza;Maria C. Alu

  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a self-expanding bioprosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis at extreme risk for surgery.

    Jeffrey J. Popma;David H. Adams;Michael J. Reardon;Steven J. Yakubov

  • Vascular injury in anterior lumbar surgery

    James K. Baker;Patrick R. Reardon;Michael J. Reardon;Michael H. Heggeness

  • 2-Year Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgical or Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    Michael J. Reardon;David H. Adams;Neal S. Kleiman;Steven J. Yakubov

  • 3-Year Outcomes in High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    G. Michael Deeb;Michael J. Reardon;Stan Chetcuti;Himanshu J. Patel

  • Standardized Definition of Structural Valve Degeneration for Surgical and Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.

    Danny Dvir;Thierry Bourguignon;Catherine M. Otto;Rebecca T. Hahn

  • 5-Year Outcomes of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients

    Thomas G. Gleason;Michael J. Reardon;Jeffrey J. Popma;G. Michael Deeb

  • Improved results of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic coronary disease: an analysis of 1,546 consecutive carotid operations.

    C L Ennix;G M Lawrie;G C Morris;E S Crawford

  • Relation of tissue Doppler derived myocardial velocities to myocardial structure and beta-adrenergic receptor density in humans

    Kesavan Shan;Roger J Bick;Brian J Poindexter;Sarah Shimoni

  • Management of primary pulmonary artery sarcomas.

    Shanda H. Blackmon;David C Rice;Arlene M Correa;Reza John Mehran

  • Early Experience With New Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

    Vinayak Bapat;Vivek Rajagopal;Christopher Meduri;R Saeid Farivar

  • Doppler Estimation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures in Patients With Mitral Valve Disease

    Abhvinav Diwan;Marti McCulloch;Gerald M. Lawrie;Michael J. Reardon

  • Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery

    William F Fearon;Frederik M Zimmermann;Bernard De Bruyne;Zsolt Piroth

  • Aortic valve and ascending aorta guidelines for management and quality measures

    Lars G. Svensson;David H. Adams;Robert O. Bonow;Nicholas T. Kouchoukos

  • Early Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using a Novel Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Are Suboptimal for Surgery: Results of the Evolut R U.S. Study

    Jeffrey J. Popma;Michael J. Reardon;Kamal Khabbaz;J. Kevin Harrison

  • Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement for Degenerated Bioprosthetic Valves and Failed Annuloplasty Rings.

    Sung Han Yoon;Brian K. Whisenant;Sabine Bleiziffer;Victoria Delgado

  • Hybrid approach to complex thoracic aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients: surgical challenges and clinical outcomes.

    Wei Zhou;Michael J. Reardon;Eric K. Peden;Peter H. Lin

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey J. Popma
Jeffrey J. Popma Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Neal S. Kleiman
Neal S. Kleiman Houston Methodist
David H. Adams
David H. Adams Mount Sinai Hospital
Alan B. Lumsden
Alan B. Lumsden Houston Methodist
Jae K. Oh
Jae K. Oh Mayo Clinic
Susheel Kodali
Susheel Kodali Columbia University Medical Center
Ron Waksman
Ron Waksman MedStar Washington Hospital Center
John V. Conte
John V. Conte Pennsylvania State University
Ted Feldman
Ted Feldman Edwards Lifesciences (United States)
Raj Makkar
Raj Makkar Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in healthcare can open up diverse career options for those interested in medicine or healthcare administration. Whether you wish to enhance your qualifications or pivot within the healthcare industry, there are flexible online programs to fit your needs.

If you have a background in nursing and want to specialize further, consider the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs to quickly become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. For those interested in the business side of healthcare, there are several healthcare administration degrees available online, offering skills in management, policy, and operations.

Cost is often a key concern for students. You can find the cheapest online mha programs to earn your Master’s in Healthcare Administration without breaking the bank. Additionally, if you’re aiming for the highest level of clinical practice, consider the least expensive dnp programs to advance your nursing career affordably.

Each of these online pathways can help you reach your educational and professional goals in medicine or healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Reardon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles