World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 97 717 626 21 19 276 31779

Andrea Kübler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrea Kübler between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrea Kübler published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2012. 25 of the 335 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2012. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 36 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 10 publications
1998 2025

335 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrea Kübler: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 3
2000 7
2001 4
2002 4
2003 8
2004 4
2005 7
2006 8
2007 8
2008 13
2009 6
2010 18
2011 22
2012 36
2013 31
2014 33
2015 26
2016 18
2017 15
2018 4
2019 12
2020 11
2021 4
2022 3
2023 3
2024 15
2025 10
Total 335
Download as CSV

Andrea Kübler publications per year - data summary

  • Andrea Kübler, a Psychology scholar from University of Würzburg, has 335 publications recorded across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1998 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2012, with 36 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1998, with 2 publications.
  • The rate of publication averages 12.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.0 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 35 publications, 10% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1998-2007: 55 publications (5.5 per year); 2008-2017: 218 publications (21.8 per year); 2018-2025: 62 publications (7.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Andrea Kübler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Kübler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 276 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 276
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrea Kübler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Andrea Kübler, a Psychology scholar from University of Würzburg, records 276 publications - the 85th percentile of the discipline.
  • 85% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Andrea Kübler, and about 15% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Andrea Kübler ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Andrea Kübler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Kübler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58 97
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Andrea Kübler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Andrea Kübler, a Psychology scholar from University of Würzburg, records 97 D-Index - the 94th percentile of the discipline.
  • 94% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Andrea Kübler, and about 6% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Andrea Kübler ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Andrea Kübler is a researcher affiliated with the University of Würzburg in Germany. Their work primarily falls within the broad field of Neuroscience, with a focus on several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, and Clinical Psychology.

The main topics addressed in Kübler's research encompass EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Cognitive Functions and Memory, and Neural Dynamics and Brain Function.

Frequent publication venues include:

  • TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Psychophysiology
  • Nature Human Behaviour

Kübler has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, notably:

  • Philipp Ziebell
  • Sonja C. Kleih
  • Matthias Eidel
  • Sebastian Halder
  • Ivo Käthner

Selected recent publications illustrate the scope and diversity of their work:

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, Brain
  • 30+ years of P300 brain-computer interfaces, 2020, Psychophysiology
  • Wheelchair Control in a Virtual Environment by Healthy Participants Using a P300-BCI Based on Tactile Stimulation: Training Effects and Usability, 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Hearing the needs of clinical users, 2020, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
  • Stimulus modality influences session-to-session transfer of training effects in auditory and tactile streaming-based P300 brain-computer interfaces, 2020, Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • A spelling device for the paralysed

    N. Birbaumer;N. Ghanayim;T. Hinterberger;I. Iversen

  • Combining Brain-Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges.

    José del R. Millán;Rüdiger Rupp;Gernot Müller-Putz;Rod Murray-Smith

  • A P300-based brain–computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    F. Nijboer;E.W. Sellers;J. Mellinger;M.A. Jordan

  • Neurophysiological Predictor of SMR-based BCI Performance

    Benjamin Blankertz;Claudia Sannelli;Sebastian Halder;Eva M. Hammer

  • The thought translation device (TTD) for completely paralyzed patients

    N. Birbaumer;A. Kubler;N. Ghanayim;T. Hinterberger

  • Brain-computer communication: unlocking the locked in.

    Andrea Kübler;Boris Kotchoubey;Jochen Kaiser;Jonathan R. Wolpaw

  • A Noninvasive Brain-Actuated Wheelchair Based on a P300 Neurophysiological Protocol and Automated Navigation

    I. Iturrate;J.M. Antelis;A. Kubler;J. Minguez

  • Patients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain-computer interface.

    A. Kübler;F. Nijboer;J. Mellinger;T. M. Vaughan

  • Psychobiology of altered states of Consciousness

    Dieter Vaitl;Niels Birbaumer;John Gruzelier;Graham A. Jamieson

  • An MEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)

    Jürgen Mellinger;Gerwin Schalk;Gerwin Schalk;Christoph Braun;Hubert Preissl;Hubert Preissl

  • Brain-computer interfaces and communication in paralysis: extinction of goal directed thinking in completely paralysed patients?

    A. Kübler;N. Birbaumer;N. Birbaumer

  • An auditory brain-computer interface (BCI).

    Femke Nijboer;Adrian Furdea;Ingo Gunst;Juergen Mellinger

  • An auditory multiclass brain-computer interface with natural stimuli: Usability evaluation with healthy participants and a motor impaired end user.

    Nadine Simon;Ivo Käthner;Carolin A. Ruf;Emanuele Pasqualotto

  • Brain-computer communication: self-regulation of slow cortical potentials for verbal communication.

    Andrea Kübler;Nicola Neumann;Jochen Kaiser;Boris Kotchoubey

  • P300 brain computer interface: current challenges and emerging trends

    Reza Fazel-Rezai;Brendan Z. Allison;Christoph Guger;Eric W. Sellers

  • An auditory oddball (P300) spelling system for brain‐computer interfaces

    A. Furdea;S. Halder;D.J. Krusienski;D. Bross

  • Clinical application of an EEG-based brain–computer interface: a case study in a patient with severe motor impairment

    C Neuper;G.R Müller;A Kübler;N Birbaumer;N Birbaumer

  • The thought translation device: a neurophysiological approach to communication in total motor paralysis.

    Andrea Kübler;Boris Kotchoubey;Thilo Hinterberger;Nimr Ghanayim

  • A Brain-Computer Interface Controlled Auditory Event-Related Potential (P300) Spelling System for Locked-In Patients

    Andrea Kübler;Andrea Kübler;Adrian Furdea;Adrian Furdea;Sebastian Halder;Eva Maria Hammer

  • Psychobiology of altered states of consciousness.

    Dieter Vaitl;Niels Birbaumer;John Gruzelier;Graham A. Jamieson

Frequent Co-Authors

Niels Birbaumer
Niels Birbaumer University of Tübingen
Sebastian Halder
Sebastian Halder University of Essex
Adrian Meule
Adrian Meule University of Regensburg
Donatella Mattia
Donatella Mattia Sapienza University of Rome
Claus Vögele
Claus Vögele University of Luxembourg
Tobias Kaufmann
Tobias Kaufmann University of Oslo
Gernot R. Müller-Putz
Gernot R. Müller-Putz Graz University of Technology
Boris Kotchoubey
Boris Kotchoubey University of Tübingen
Jochen Kaiser
Jochen Kaiser Goethe University Frankfurt
Febo Cincotti
Febo Cincotti Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of career pathways, especially with the growth of online education. Many students now opt for online bachelor’s or master's programs as a flexible route to entering the field. These programs can serve as the first step toward becoming a licensed therapist or counselor in the USA.

Each state has specific regulations and educational requirements for licensure. For example, you can learn about how to become a licensed therapist in Newark or explore the Norfolk licensed therapist requirements. Prospective therapists should also review the North Las Vegas licensed therapist education requirements and Oakland licensed therapist education requirements to understand the variety of pathways available.

Online degrees can provide a solid foundation, but it’s essential to check local licensure rules and internship requirements early in your academic journey. With the right credentials, graduates can pursue roles as clinical counselors, school psychologists, and mental health professionals in diverse settings nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Andrea Kübler

Trending Scientists