World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin Hautzinger

Martin Hautzinger

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 79 1485 1327 61 59 515 31117
Medicine 78 17853 16781 936 901 423 30264

Martin Hautzinger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Hautzinger between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Hautzinger published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 13 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2013. 20 of the 599 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2013. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 37 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 42 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 39 publications 2018: 38 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 9 publications
1980 2025

599 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Hautzinger: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 1
1982 2
1983 2
1984 2
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 2
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 10
1993 2
1994 6
1995 1
1996 5
1997 3
1998 4
1999 8
2000 10
2001 4
2002 11
2003 17
2004 16
2005 18
2006 10
2007 15
2008 12
2009 15
2010 27
2011 37
2012 32
2013 42
2014 28
2015 29
2016 25
2017 39
2018 38
2019 25
2020 19
2021 18
2022 23
2023 16
2024 11
2025 9
Total 599
Download as CSV

Martin Hautzinger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Hautzinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 511–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 515 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26 515
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Hautzinger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Hautzinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137 79
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin Hautzinger is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research spans multiple areas within psychology and medicine, with a significant focus on clinical psychology and psychiatry. Over their career, they have contributed extensively to the understanding of mental health disorders, especially mood disorders such as bipolar disorder and major depression.

The scientist's research predominantly covers these fields of study:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Within these broader fields, they have explored several subfields, including:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Pharmacology
  • Social Psychology

The main topics addressed in their academic work include:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Martin Hautzinger has published in various scientific venues. The most frequent publication sources include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Der Nervenarzt

They have collaborated recurrently with several co-authors, indicating ongoing research partnerships, notably with:

  • Elisabeth Schramm
  • Sebastian Wolf
  • Britta Seiffer
  • Gorden Sudeck
  • Michael Bauer

Selected recent publications by Martin Hautzinger demonstrate the scope of their research interests:

  • Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology (2021, Nature Genetics)
  • Genomics yields biological and phenotypic insights into bipolar disorder (2025, Nature)
  • Comparing Effectiveness of HRV-Biofeedback and Mindfulness for Workplace Stress Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial (2020, Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback)
  • The Efficacy of Physical Activity for Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2021, Journal of Attention Disorders)
  • Effects of an intervention to reduce fear of falling and increase physical activity during hip and pelvic fracture rehabilitation (2020, Age and Ageing)

Best Publications

  • Genetic relationship between five psychiatric disorders estimated from genome-wide SNPs

    S. Hong Lee;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Benjamin M. Neale;Benjamin M. Neale;Stephen V. Faraone

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 30 loci associated with bipolar disorder

    Eli A. Stahl;Eli A. Stahl;Gerome Breen;Andreas J. Forstner;Andrew McQuillin

  • Large-scale genome-wide association analysis of bipolar disorder identifies a new susceptibility locus near ODZ4

    Pamela Sklar;Pamela Sklar;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Laura J. Scott;Ole A. Andreassen

  • Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology

    Niamh Mullins;Andreas J. Forstner;Andreas J. Forstner;Andreas J. Forstner;Kevin S. O'Connell;Kevin S. O'Connell;Brandon Coombes

  • Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders

    Phil H. Lee;Verneri Anttila;Hyejung Won;Yen-Chen A. Feng

  • Beck Depressions-Inventar

    Martin Hautzinger;Ferdinand Keller;Christine Kühner

  • Genomic Dissection of Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia, Including 28 Subphenotypes

    Douglas M. Ruderfer;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Andrew McQuillin;James Boocock

  • Psychiatric genome-wide association study analyses implicate neuronal, immune and histone pathways

    Colm O'Dushlaine;Lizzy Rossin;Phil H. Lee;Laramie Duncan;Laramie Duncan

  • Reliabilität und Validität des revidierten Beck-Depressionsinventars (BDI-II)

    C. Kühner;C. Bürger;F. Keller;M. Hautzinger

  • [Reliability and validity of the Revised Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). Results from German samples].

    C Kühner;C Bürger;F Keller;M Hautzinger

  • Kognitive Verhaltenstherapie bei Depressionen

    Martin Hautzinger

  • Genome-wide association study reveals two new risk loci for bipolar disorder

    Thomas W. Mühleisen;Thomas W. Mühleisen;Markus Leber;Markus Leber;Thomas G. Schulze;Jana Strohmaier

  • Genome-wide Association Study Identifies Genetic Variation in Neurocan as a Susceptibility Factor for Bipolar Disorder

    Sven Cichon;Thomas W. Mühleisen;Franziska A. Degenhardt;Manuel Mattheisen

  • Allgemeine Depressions Skala

    Martin Hautzinger;Maja Bailer

  • Klinische Psychologie : ein Lehrbuch

    Gerald C. Davison;John M. Neale;Martin Hautzinger;Maria Baur

  • I can see what you feel, but I can't deal with it: Impaired theory of mind in depression

    Larissa Wolkenstein;Michael Schönenberg;Evelyne Schirm;Martin Hautzinger

  • Intuitive eating is associated with interoceptive sensitivity. Effects on body mass index.

    Beate M. Herbert;Jens Blechert;Martin Hautzinger;Ellen Matthias

  • Effects of coping-oriented couples therapy on depression: a randomized clinical trial

    Guy Bodenmann;Bernard Plancherel;Steven R. H. Beach;Kathrin Widmer

  • Distressed couples with and without a depressed partner: An analysis of their verbal interaction.

    Martin Hautzinger;Michael Linden;Nicholas Hoffman

  • Allgemeine Depressions-Skala (ADS). Normierung an Minderjährigen und Erweiterung zur Erfassung manischer Symptome (ADMS).

    Thomas D. Meyer;Martin Hautzinger

  • Joint Analysis of Psychiatric Disorders Increases Accuracy of Risk Prediction for Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder

    Robert Maier;Gerhard Moser;Guo-Bo Chen;Stephan Ripke

  • Genome wide meta-analysis identifies genomic relationships, novel loci, and pleiotropic mechanisms across eight psychiatric disorders

    Lee Ph;Anttila;Won H

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Herms
Stefan Herms University of Basel
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia
Janice M. Fullerton
Janice M. Fullerton University of New South Wales
Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Bertram Müller-Myhsok Max Planck Society
Stephan Ripke
Stephan Ripke Massachusetts General Hospital
Thomas G. Schulze
Thomas G. Schulze Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Michael Bauer
Michael Bauer TU Dresden
Thomas D. Meyer
Thomas D. Meyer The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Manuel Mattheisen
Manuel Mattheisen Dalhousie University
Sven Cichon
Sven Cichon University of Basel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in psychology opens doors to numerous online pathways and specialized careers. Among the most rewarding is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a role in high demand across various U.S. cities and states.

If you’re interested in this field, it’s important to know the steps to certification and regional requirements. For instance, you can explore exactly how to become a bcba in New York City or learn about how to become a bcba in Newark for guidance specific to New Jersey.

Each location may have unique processes, as seen when reviewing how to become a bcba in Norfolk or understanding North Las Vegas bcba requirements. These resources outline educational prerequisites, supervised experience hours, and application procedures.

Online psychology degrees often provide the flexibility and curriculum needed to pursue BCBA certification or related career tracks. As demand for behavioral specialists grows, understanding local regulations and online study options will help you chart a successful professional pathway in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Hautzinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles