World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10918 10217 5708 5211 93 4321

Thomas D. Meyer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas D. Meyer between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas D. Meyer published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2025. 21 of the 151 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2025. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 13 publications
1994 2025

151 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas D. Meyer: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 5
2002 5
2003 5
2004 1
2005 8
2006 7
2007 6
2008 8
2009 8
2010 9
2011 11
2012 9
2013 11
2014 1
2015 0
2016 1
2017 0
2018 2
2019 5
2020 2
2021 6
2022 11
2023 5
2024 8
2025 13
Total 151
Download as CSV

Thomas D. Meyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas D. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 93
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas D. Meyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas D. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas D. Meyer is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within medicine and psychology, with a particular focus on psychiatry and mental health as well as clinical psychology.

The scientist's recent published work includes several studies addressing psychiatric and neurological disorders. Notable papers are:

  • "Angiogenic gene networks are dysregulated in opioid use disorder: evidence from multi-omics and imaging of postmortem human brain," 2021, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Genome-Wide Correlation of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression in Postmortem Brain Tissues of Opioid Use Disorder Patients," 2021, The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "Are existing self-ratings of acute manic symptoms in adults reliable and valid?-A systematic review," 2020, Bipolar Disorders
  • "A master protocol to investigate a novel therapy acetyl-l-leucine for three ultra-rare neurodegenerative diseases: Niemann-Pick type C, the GM2 gangliosidoses, and ataxia telangiectasia," 2021, Trials
  • "White matter deficits in cocaine use disorder: convergent evidence from in vivo diffusion tensor imaging and ex vivo proteomic analysis," 2021, Translational Psychiatry

Their research interest areas include:

  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Chemical synthesis and alkaloids

Thomas D. Meyer frequently publishes in various scientific venues. These include:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Bipolar Disorders

Collaborations form an important part of their work, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Consuelo Walss-Bass
  • Laura Stertz
  • Gabriel R. Fries
  • Jair C. Soares
  • Emily Méndez

The primary fields of study for Thomas D. Meyer encompass Medicine with 51 publications and Psychology with 34 publications. Subfields focus on:

  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • The HCL-32: towards a self-assessment tool for hypomanic symptoms in outpatients

    Jules Angst;Rolf Adolfsson;Franco Benazzi;Alex Gamma

  • Allgemeine Depressions-Skala (ADS). Normierung an Minderjährigen und Erweiterung zur Erfassung manischer Symptome (ADMS).

    Thomas D. Meyer;Martin Hautzinger

  • Towards measurement of the Healthy Ageing Phenotype in lifestyle-based intervention studies.

    Jose Lara;Alan Godfrey;Elizabeth Evans;Ben Heaven

  • A semi‐structured interview to assess visual hallucinations in older people

    Urs Peter Mosimann;Daniel Collerton;Robert Dudley;Thomas Daniel Meyer

  • Validity of the ALS-Depression-Inventory (ADI-12)— A new screening instrument for depressive disorders in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Eva Maria Hammer;Sonja Häcker;Martin Hautzinger;Thomas D. Meyer

  • The misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder as a psychotic disorder: some of its causes and their influence on therapy.

    Friederike Meyer;Thomas D. Meyer;Thomas D. Meyer

  • The Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32): its factorial structure and association to indices of impairment in German and Swedish nonclinical samples.

    Thomas D Meyer;Philipp Hammelstein;Lars Göran Nilsson;Peter Skeppar

  • The Hypomanic Personality Scale, the Big Five, and their relationship to depression and mania

    Thomas D Meyer

  • Mood fluctuations in people putatively at risk for bipolar disorders

    Beate U. Hofmann;Thomas D. Meyer

  • Screening for bipolar disorders using the Hypomanic Personality Scale.

    Thomas D Meyer;Martin Hautzinger

  • Design to promote mindfulness practice and sense of self for vulnerable women in secure hospital services

    Anja Thieme;Jayne Wallace;Paula Johnson;John McCarthy

  • Are measures of hypomanic personality, impulsive nonconformity and rigidity predictors of bipolar symptoms?

    Jens Blechert;Thomas D. Meyer

  • Do people with dementia find lies and deception in dementia care acceptable

    Anna M Day;Ian A James;Thomas D Meyer;David R Lee

  • Hypomania: a transcultural perspective

    Jules Angst;Thomas D. Meyer;Rolf Adolfsson;Peter Skeppar

  • Is there evidence for social rhythm instability in people at risk for affective disorders

    Thomas D. Meyer;Silke Maier

  • S3-Leitlinie zur Diagnostik und Therapie bipolarer Störungen

    A. Pfennig;T. Bschor;T. Baghai;T. Baghai;P. Bräunig

  • Cognitive behaviour therapy and supportive therapy for bipolar disorders: relapse rates for treatment period and 2-year follow-up.

    Thomas D. Meyer;Martin Hautzinger

  • Assessing the dysregulation of the Behavioral Activation System: the Hypomanic Personality Scale and the BIS-BAS scales.

    Thomas D. Meyer;Beate U. Hofmann

  • Attitudes of young people towards depression and mania

    Larissa Wolkenstein;Thomas D. Meyer

  • Current and former depression and their relationship to the effects of social comparison processes. Results of an internet based study.

    Eva Bäzner;Philip Brömer;Philipp Hammelstein;Thomas D. Meyer

  • Academic performance and expectations for the future in relation to a vulnerability marker for bipolar disorders: the hypomanic temperament

    Thomas D Meyer;Christiane Krumm-Merabet

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Hautzinger
Martin Hautzinger University of Tübingen
Jan Scott
Jan Scott Newcastle University
Rolf Adolfsson
Rolf Adolfsson Umeå University
Jair C. Soares
Jair C. Soares The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Gabriel R. Fries
Gabriel R. Fries The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Michael Bauer
Michael Bauer TU Dresden
Frank Padberg
Frank Padberg Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta University of Barcelona
Christine L. Mummery
Christine L. Mummery Leiden University Medical Center
Zhongming Zhao
Zhongming Zhao The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up diverse opportunities in mental health, counseling, and related fields. Online degrees in psychology or counseling provide flexibility and accessibility, making it easier for students to balance their studies with other commitments.

It's important to understand that requirements for becoming a counselor or mental health professional can vary by location. For example, you can learn about how to become a mental health counselor in Minneapolis if you plan to work in Minnesota. Similarly, those interested in Tennessee can review all mental health counselor requirements in Nashville.

Prospective counselors in the South should consider how to become a mental health counselor in New Orleans, while those aiming for careers in New York can reference specific mental health counselor requirements in New York City.

No matter where you choose to study or work, pursuing a psychology degree can prepare you for meaningful roles supporting mental health in your community.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas D. Meyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles