World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 40 1686 1578 53 51 172 6435

Edwin J. Nijssen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edwin J. Nijssen between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edwin J. Nijssen published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2001. 5 of the 179 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2001. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1992 2025

179 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edwin J. Nijssen: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 4
1995 4
1996 6
1997 6
1998 5
1999 8
2000 4
2001 17
2002 5
2003 6
2004 7
2005 5
2006 2
2007 1
2008 2
2009 5
2010 2
2011 7
2012 3
2013 6
2014 7
2015 4
2016 10
2017 14
2018 4
2019 5
2020 3
2021 15
2022 3
2023 2
2024 2
2025 3
Total 179
Download as CSV

Edwin J. Nijssen publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin J. Nijssen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 170–174 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 172 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40 172
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Edwin J. Nijssen D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin J. Nijssen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81 40
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Edwin J. Nijssen is affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands and has contributed to research primarily within the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Social Sciences. Their work spans several subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Marketing, Social Psychology, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

Their main research topics focus on Digital Marketing and Social Media, Innovation and Knowledge Management, Technology Adoption and User Behaviour, Knowledge Management and Sharing, Consumer Retail Behavior Studies, Open Source Software Innovations, and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty.

Frequent publication venues for Nijssen's work include:

  • Industrial Marketing Management
  • Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management
  • Journal of Service Management
  • Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  • Journal of Business Research

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Nijssen are:

  • How important is alignment of social media use and R&D-Marketing cooperation for innovation success?, 2020, Journal of Business Research
  • The impact of digital transformation on salespeople: an empirical investigation using the JD-R model, 2021, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management
  • Studying the antecedents and outcome of social media use by salespeople using a MOA framework, 2020, Industrial Marketing Management
  • Reducing food waste through digital platforms: A quantification of cross-side network effects, 2020, Industrial Marketing Management
  • How young companies can effectively manage their slack resources over time to ensure sales growth: the contingent role of value-based selling, 2020, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Nijssen frequently collaborates with several co-authors including Paolo Guenzi, Michel van der Borgh, Jeroen Schepers, David Leiño Calleja, and Ties van Bommel, indicating a pattern of recurring academic partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences

    Edwin J. Nijssen;Bas Hillebrand;Patrick A.M. Vermeulen;Ron G.M. Kemp

  • Examining the animosity model in a country with a high level of foreign trade

    Edwin J. Nijssen;Susan P. Douglas

  • Performance effects of using the Balanced Scorecard: a note on the Dutch experience

    Geert J.M. Braam;Edwin J. Nijssen

  • Integrating Branding Strategy Across Markets: Building International Brand Architecture

    Susan P. Douglas;C. Samuel Craig;Edwin J. Nijssen

  • On the use of 'borrowed' scales in cross-national research: a cautionary note.

    Susan P. Douglas;Edwin J. Nijssen

  • Determinants of the adoption of new product development tools by industrial firms

    Edwin J. Nijssen;Ruud T. Frambach

  • Success factors of line extensions of fast‐moving consumer goods

    Edwin J. Nijssen

  • Consumer World-Mindedness, Social-Mindedness, and Store Image:

    Edwin J . Nijssen;Susan P . Douglas

  • Strategic reactions of national brand manufacturers towards private labels: An empirical study in The Netherlands

    Peter C. Verhoef;Edwin J. Nijssen;Laurens M. Sloot

  • Consumer World-Mindedness and Attitudes toward Product Positioning in Advertising: An Examination of Global versus Foreign versus Local Positioning:

    Edwin J . Nijssen;Susan P . Douglas

  • Exploring CRM effectiveness: an institutional theory perspective

    Bas Hillebrand;Jurriaan J. Nijholt;Edwin J. Nijssen

  • Investigating Industry Context Effects in Consumer-Firm Relationships: Preliminary Results From a Dispositional Approach:

    Edwin Nijssen;Jagdip Singh;Deepak Sirdeshmukh;Hartmut Holzmüeller

  • Awareness, use and effectiveness of models and methods for new product development

    Ed J. Nijssen;Karin F.M. Lieshout

  • Accelerating New Product Development: A Preliminary Empirical Test of a Hierarchy of Implementation

    Ed J. Nijssen;Arthur R. L. Arbouw;Harry R. Commandeur

  • Unraveling willingness to cannibalize: a closer look at the barrier to radical innovation

    Edwin J. Nijssen;Bas Hillebrand;Patrick A.M. Vermeulen

  • Don’t just fix it, make it better! Using frontline service employees to improve recovery performance

    Gielis A. H. van der Heijden;Jeroen J. L. Schepers;Edwin J. Nijssen;Andrea Ordanini

  • Understanding workplace boredom among white collar employees: Temporary reactions and individual differences

    van der Gah Gielis Heijden;Jjl Jeroen Schepers;EJ Ed Nijssen

  • Conjoining international marketing and relationship marketing: Exploring consumers' cross-border service relationships

    Edwin J . Nijssen;Hester van Herk

  • A laddering approach to the use of methods and techniques to reduce the cycle time of new-to-the-firm products

    Fred Langerak;Ed Peelen;Edwin Nijssen

  • Entrepreneurial marketing : an effectual approach

    Edwin J. Nijssen

  • Success Factors of Line Extensions of Fast Moving Consumer Goods

    E.J. Nijssen;S. de Jonge;B. van Leeuwen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jagdip Singh
Jagdip Singh Case Western Reserve University
Susan P. Douglas
Susan P. Douglas New York University
Fred Langerak
Fred Langerak Eindhoven University of Technology
Peter C. Verhoef
Peter C. Verhoef University of Groningen
Ruth Stock
Ruth Stock Technical University of Darmstadt
Andrea Ordanini
Andrea Ordanini Bocconi University
Athanasios Krystallis
Athanasios Krystallis American College of Greece
Christopher L. Tucci
Christopher L. Tucci Imperial College London
Dominique Foray
Dominique Foray École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Willem Verbeke
Willem Verbeke Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Business and Management are highly versatile fields, opening doors to a variety of career pathways. Students looking to specialize can explore a construction management degree, which blends business acumen with technical project oversight—ideal for those considering leadership roles in construction and development sectors.

Ambitious professionals often pursue an affordable online executive mba to quickly boost their qualifications and gain strategic leadership skills while balancing work and study. Similarly, the demand for advanced credentials continues to grow, making the search for the least expensive online masters an effective way to gain specialized knowledge without incurring undue debt.

Tech-savvy business students may consider one of the best data science master’s programs, combining management fundamentals with advanced analytics—a high-growth area in the digital economy. Each pathway offers distinct advantages and flexible online options to suit busy lifestyles and varied career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin J. Nijssen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles